Literature DB >> 26152844

Endoscopic follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer.

R J L F Loffeld1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Follow-up surgery for colorectal cancer is recommended. The yield of endoscopy is unknown and was therefore studied.
METHODS: Patients with colorectal cancer in the years 2003, 2004 and 2005 were included. Evaluation was done in July 2014.
RESULTS: Cancer was diagnosed in 267 patients. These were divided into three groups: group 1-still alive (n = 88), group 2-died within 1 year after diagnosis (n = 67), and group 3-died more than 1 year after diagnosis (n = 112). Patients in group 3 showed a trend towards non-cancer-related death (p = 0.06). Endoscopic follow-up was done in 101 patients (37.6 %). Patients still alive underwent more often follow-up colonoscopy (p < 0.001). Patients still alive had more often synchronous polyps detected during index endoscopy compared with patients of groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.03). Follow-up revealed more often new polyp(s) (p = 0.006). If no polyps were seen during the time of diagnosing cancer, follow-up endoscopy detected polyp(s) in 26 % of cases. Two newly developed cancers in group 1 and three in group 3 were diagnosed.
CONCLUSION: Endoscopic follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal cancer has a high diagnostic yield. Whether detection and removal of polyps increases survival is not yet clear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Colorectal cancer; Diagnostic yield; Follow-up; Surgery; Treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26152844     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2312-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  10 in total

Review 1.  Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joe J Tjandra; Miranda K Y Chan
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  A direct comparison of the prevalence of advanced adenoma and cancer between surveillance and screening colonoscopies.

Authors:  Alexander Crispin; Ulrich Mansmann; Axel Munte; Mark Op den Winkel; Burkhard Göke; Frank Thomas Kolligs
Journal:  Digestion       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.216

3.  Physician follow-up and observation of guidelines in the post treatment surveillance of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gabriela M Vargas; Kristin M Sheffield; Abhishek D Parmar; Yimei Han; Kimberly M Brown; Taylor S Riall
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Detection of metachronous neoplasms in colorectal cancer patients: identification of risk factors.

Authors:  Belen Ballesté; Xavier Bessa; Virginia Piñol; Sergi Castellví-Bel; Antoni Castells; Cristina Alenda; Artemio Paya; Rodrigo Jover; Rosa Ma Xicola; Elisenda Pons; Xavier Llor; Carmen Cordero; Ferran Fernandez-Bañares; Luisa de Castro; Josep Maria Reñé; Montserrat Andreu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  The high yield of 1-year colonoscopy after resection: is it the handoff?

Authors:  Neil Hyman; Jesse Moore; Peter Cataldo; Turner Osler
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surveillance colonoscopy after resection for colon carcinoma.

Authors:  P G Brady; R J Straker; S Goldschmid
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber; M N Ho; M J O'Brien; L S Gottlieb; S S Sternberg; J D Waye; M Schapiro; J H Bond; J F Panish
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Metachronous colorectal cancer: a competing risks analysis with consideration for a stratified approach to surveillance colonoscopy.

Authors:  Nicholas J Battersby; Alex Coupland; George Bouliotis; Nazzia Mirza; J Graham Williams
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 9.  Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening--review of literature.

Authors:  Sri Rapuri; Jeanne Spencer; Dennis Eckels
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  22-year longitudinal study of repetitive colonoscopy in patients with a family history of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J K Randall; C S Good; J M Gilbert
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.951

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.