Literature DB >> 17468913

Detection of metachronous neoplasms in colorectal cancer patients: identification of risk factors.

Belen Ballesté1, Xavier Bessa, Virginia Piñol, Sergi Castellví-Bel, Antoni Castells, Cristina Alenda, Artemio Paya, Rodrigo Jover, Rosa Ma Xicola, Elisenda Pons, Xavier Llor, Carmen Cordero, Ferran Fernandez-Bañares, Luisa de Castro, Josep Maria Reñé, Montserrat Andreu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patients with colorectal cancer have a high risk of developing metachronous neoplasms. Identification of predictive factors associated with such conditions would allow individualized follow-up strategies in these patients. This study was designed to identify individual and familial factors associated with the development of metachronous colorectal neoplasms in patients with colorectal cancer.
METHODS: In the context of a prospective, multicenter, general population-based study-the EPICOLON project-all patients with colorectal cancer attended in ten Spanish hospitals during a one-year period were included. Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis or inflammatory bowel disease were excluded. All patients were monitored by colonoscopy within two years of the diagnoses. Demographic, clinical, pathologic, molecular (microsatellite instability status and immunohistochemistry for MSH2 and MLH1), and familial characteristics (fulfillment of Amsterdam I or II criteria, and revised Bethesda guidelines) were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 353 patients were included in the study. At two years of follow-up, colonoscopy revealed the presence of adenomas in 89 (25 percent) patients and colorectal cancer in 14 (3.9 percent) patients, in 7 cases restricted to anastomosis. Univariate analysis demonstrated that development of metachronous neoplasm (adenoma or colorectal cancer) was associated with personal history of previous colorectal cancer (odds ratio, 5.58; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.01-31.01), and presence of previous or synchronous adenomas (odds ratio, 1.77; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.21-3.17). Although nonstatistical significance was achieved, metachronisms were associated with gender (P<0.09) and differentiation degree (P<0.08). Multivariate analysis identified previous or synchronous adenomas (odds ratio, 1.98; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.16-3.38) as independent predictive factor. Neither presence of tumor DNA microsatellite instability nor family history correlated with the presence of metachronous neoplasms.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with previous or synchronous colorectal adenoma have an increased risk of developing metachronous colorectal neoplasms. Accordingly, this subgroup of patients may benefit from specific surveillance strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17468913     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-0237-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  19 in total

1.  Metachronous colorectal cancer in Taiwan: analyzing 20 years of data from Taiwan Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Tzu-An Chen; Jorng-Tzong Horng; Wen-Chu Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Endoscopic follow-up after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R J L F Loffeld
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  The molecular pathogenesis of colorectal cancer and its potential application to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  William M Grady; Sanford D Markowitz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Metachronous carcinomas in colorectum and its clinicopathological significance.

Authors:  Alfred King-Yin Lam; Vinod Gopalan; Robert Carmichael; Petra Gertraud Buettner; Melissa Leung; Robert Smith; Cu-Tai Lu; Yik-Hong Ho; Simon Siu
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Various clinicopathological features of patients with metachronous colorectal cancer in relation to different diagnostic intervals.

Authors:  Po-Yen Lin; Jy-Ming Chiang; Hsin-Yun Huang; Jeng-Fu You; Sum-Fu Chiang; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Rei-Ping Tang
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Colonoscopy Surveillance after Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; C Richard Boland; Jason A Dominitz; Francis M Giardiello; David A Johnson; Tonya Kaltenbach; David Lieberman; Theodore R Levin; Douglas J Robertson; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Polyp surveillance after surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kazushige Kawai; Eiji Sunami; Nelson H Tsuno; Joji Kitayama; Toshiaki Watanabe
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Estimating the unknown parameters of the natural history of metachronous colorectal cancer using discrete-event simulation.

Authors:  Fatih Safa Erenay; Oguzhan Alagoz; Ritesh Banerjee; Robert R Cima
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 2.583

9.  Synchronous pathologic findings in patients with colorectal cancer and preoperative incomplete colonoscopy.

Authors:  Carolin Krause; W Kruis
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-06-29       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Rectal Neuroendocrine Tumors According to the Pathologic Status After Initial Endoscopic Resection: A KASID Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Chang Mo Moon; Kyu Chan Huh; Sung-Ae Jung; Dong Il Park; Won Hee Kim; Hye Mi Jung; Seong-Joon Koh; Jin-Oh Kim; Yunho Jung; Kyeong Ok Kim; Jong Wook Kim; Dong-Hoon Yang; Jeong Eun Shin; Sung Jae Shin; Eun Soo Kim; Young-Eun Joo
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 10.864

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.