| Literature DB >> 26147005 |
Laís Vales Mennitti1, Lila Missae Oyama2, Juliana Lopez de Oliveira2, Ana Claudia Losinskas Hachul2, Aline Boveto Santamarina2, Aline Alves de Santana2, Marcos Hiromu Okuda2, Eliane Beraldi Ribeiro2, Claudia Maria da Penha Oller do Nascimento2, Luciana Pellegrini Pisani3.
Abstract
Previously, we showed that oligofructose (10%) supplementation during pregnancy and lactation increased endotoxemia in 21-d-old pups. The present study evaluated the effect of 10% oligofructose diet supplementation during pregnancy and lactation in the presence or absence of hydrogenated vegetable fat on the pro-inflammatory status of 21-d-old offspring. On the first day of pregnancy, female Wistar rats were divided into the following groups: control diet (C), control diet supplemented with 10% oligofructose (CF), diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat (T) or diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat supplemented with 10% oligofructose (TF). Diets were maintained during pregnancy and lactation. Serum TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha) was assessed using a specific kit. Protein expression was determined by Western Blotting, and the relative mRNA levels were analyzed by RT-PCR (real-time polymerase chain reaction). We observed that 10% oligofructose supplementation during pregnancy and lactation increased offspring's IL-6R (interleukin-6 receptor) mRNA levels in the liver and RET (retroperitoneal white adipose tissue) and decreased ADIPOR2 (adiponectin receptor 2) and ADIPOR1 (adiponectin receptor 1) gene expression in liver and EDL (extensor digital longus)/ SOL (soleus) muscles of CF group. Additionally, TF group presented with increased serum TNF-α, protein expression of p-NFκBp65 (phosphorylated form of nuclear factor kappa B p65 subunit) in liver and IL-6R mRNA levels in RET. These findings were accompanied by decreased levels of ADIPOR1 mRNA in the EDL and SOL muscles of the TF group. In conclusion, supplementing the dam's diet with 10% of oligofructose during pregnancy and lactation, independent of hydrogenated vegetable fat addition, contributes to the increased pro-inflammatory status of 21-d-old offspring, possibly through the activation of the TLR4 (toll like receptor 4) pathway.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26147005 PMCID: PMC4493056 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132038
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Composition of the control diet, control diet supplemented with oligofructose, diet enriched with trans fatty acids and diet enriched with trans fatty acids supplemented with oligofructose according to AIN-93.
| Diet (g/100g) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ingredient | C | CF | T | TF |
| Casein | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| L-cystine | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Cornstarch | 62.0 | 52.0 | 62.0 | 52.0 |
| Soybeanoil | 8.0 | 8.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Hydrogenated vegetable fat | - | - | 7.0 | 7.0 |
| Butylhydroquinone | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 | 0.0014 |
| Mineral mixture | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Vitaminmixture | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Cellulose | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Cholinebitartrate | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 |
| Oligofructose | - | 10.0 | - | 10.0 |
| Energy (kcal/g) | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
*Casein was obtained from Labsynth, São Paulo, Brazil.
†L-cystine, cornstarch, butylhydroquinone, cellulose and choline bitartrate were obtained from Viafarma, São Paulo, Brazil.
‡Oil was supplied from soybean (Lisa/Ind. Brazil).
$Hydrogenated vegetable fat was supplied from Unilever, São Paulo, Brazil.
§Mineral mix 9mg/kg diet): calcium, 5000; phosphorus, 1561; potassium, 3600;sodium, 1019; chloride, 1571; sulfur, 300; magnesium, 507; iron, 35; copper,6.0; manganese, 10.0; zinc, 30.0; chromium, 1.0; iodine 0.2; selenium, 0.15;fluoride, 1.00; boron, 0.50; molybdenum, 0.15; silicon, 5.0; nickel, 0.5; lithium,0.1; vanadium, 0.1 (AIN-93G, mineral mix, Rhoster, Brazil).
#Vitamin mix (mg/kg diet): thiamin HCL, 6.0, riboflavin, 6.0; pyridoxine HCL 7.0; niacin, 30.0; calcium pantothenate, 16.0; folic acid, 2.0; biotin, 0.2; vitamin B12,25.0; vitamin A palmitate 4000 IU; vitamin E acetate, 75; vitamin D3, 1000 IU; vitamin KI, 0.75. (AIN-93G, vitamin mix, Rhoster, Brazil).
£Oligofructose (P95) was manufactured by Orafti (Pemuco, Chile) and was obtained by Viafarma, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fig 1Serum concentration of TNF-α.
C—male offspring of dams fed control diet; CF—male offspring of dams fed control diet supplemented with oligofructose; T—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat; TF—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat supplemented with oligofructose. The number in parentheses refers to the sample value (C group presented one outlier sample). Data are means ± SEMs. *p≤ 0.05 versus C. $p≤ 0.05 versus T. #p≤ 0.05 versus TF.
Fig 2(A) Gene expression of TLR4 in the liver, (B) Gene expression of TNFR1 in the liver, (C) Gene expression of IL-6R in the liver and (D) Gene expression of ADIPOR2 in the liver. C—male offspring of dams fed control diet; CF—male offspring of dams fed control diet supplemented with oligofructose; T—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat; TF—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat supplemented with oligofructose. The number in parentheses refers to the sample value (Fig 2A and 2D: CF group presented one outlier sample). Data are means ± SEMs. Results are expressed in arbitrary units, stipulating 100 as the control value. *p≤ 0.05 versus C. &p≤ 0.05 versus CF.
Fig 3(A) Protein expression of TLR4 in the liver, (B) Protein expression of IL-6Rα in the liver, (C) Protein expression of NFκB p50 phosphorylated form in the liver (p-NFκB p50) and (D) Protein expression of NFκB p65 phosphorylated form in the liver (p-NFκB p65). C—male offspring of dams fed control diet; CF—male offspring of dams fed control diet supplemented with oligofructose; T—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat; TF—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat supplemented with oligofructose. The number in parentheses refers to the sample value (Fig 3B and 3D: TF group presented one outlier sample). Data are means ± SEMs. Results are expressed in arbitrary units, stipulating 100 as the control value. $p≤ 0.05 versus T. #p≤ 0.05 versus TF.
Fig 4(A) Gene expression of TLR4 in the RET, (B) Gene expression of IL-6R in the RET and (C) Gene expression of ADIPOR1 in the RET. C—male offspring of dams fed control diet; CF—male offspring of dams fed control diet supplemented with oligofructose; T—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat; TF—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat supplemented with oligofructose. The number in parentheses refers to the sample value (Fig 4B: TF group presented one outlier sample). Data are means ± SEMs. Results are expressed in arbitrary units, stipulating 100 as the control value. *p≤ 0.05 versus C.
Fig 5(A) Protein expression of TLR4 in the RET, (B) Protein expression of IL-6Rα in the RET, (C) Protein expression of NFκB p50 phosphorylated form in the RET (p-NFκB p50) and (D) Protein expression of ADIPOR1 in the RET. C—male offspring of dams fed control diet; CF—male offspring of dams fed control diet supplemented with oligofructose; T—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat; TF—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat supplemented with oligofructose. The number in parentheses refers to the sample value (Fig 4D: T group presented one outlier sample). Data are means ± SEMs. Results are expressed in arbitrary units, stipulating 100 as the control value.
Fig 6(A) Gene expression of ADIPOR1 in the EDL muscle and (B) Gene expression of ADIPOR1 in the SOL muscle. C—male offspring of dams fed control diet; CF—male offspring of dams fed control diet supplemented with oligofructose; T—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat; TF—male offspring of dams fed diet enriched with hydrogenated vegetable fat supplemented with oligofructose. The number in parentheses refers to the sample value. Data are means ± SEMs. Results are expressed in arbitrary units, stipulating 100 as the control value. *p≤ 0.05 versus C. #p≤ 0.05 versus TF.