OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate feasibility of free-breathing radial acquisition with respiratory motion-resolved compressed sensing reconstruction [extra-dimensional golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging (XD-GRASP)] for multiphase dynamic gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced liver imaging, and to compare image quality to compressed sensing reconstruction with respiratory motion-averaging (GRASP) and prior conventional breath-held Cartesian-sampled data sets [BH volume interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE)] in same patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective study, 16 subjects underwent free-breathing continuous radial acquisition during Gd-EOB-DTPA injection and had prior BH-VIBE available. Acquired data were reconstructed using motion-averaging GRASP approach in which consecutive 84 spokes were grouped in each contrast-enhanced phase for a temporal resolution of approximately 14 seconds. Additionally, respiratory motion-resolved reconstruction was performed from the same k-space data by sorting each contrast-enhanced phase into multiple respiratory motion states using compressed sensing algorithm named XD-GRASP, which exploits sparsity along both the contrast-enhancement and respiratory-state dimensions.Contrast-enhanced dynamic multiphase XD-GRASP, GRASP, and BH-VIBE images were anonymized, pooled together in a random order, and presented to 2 board-certified radiologists for independent evaluation of image quality, with higher score indicating more optimal examination. RESULTS: The XD-GRASP reconstructions had significantly (all P < 0.05) higher overall image quality scores compared to GRASP for early arterial (reader 1: 4.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.31 ± 0.6; reader 2: 3.81 ± 0.8 vs 3.38 ± 0.9) and late arterial (reader 1: 4.5 ± 0.6 vs 3.63 ± 0.6; reader 2: 3.56 ± 0.5 vs 2.88 ± 0.7) phases of enhancement for both readers. The XD-GRASP also had higher overall image quality score in portal venous phase, which was significant for reader 1 (4.44 ± 0.5 vs 3.75 ± 0.8; P = 0.002). In addition, the XD-GRASP had higher overall image quality score compared to BH-VIBE for early (reader 1: 4.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.88 ± 0.6; reader 2: 3.81 ± 0.8 vs 3.50 ± 1.0) and late (reader 1: 4.5 ± 0.6 vs 3.44 ± 0.6; reader 2: 3.56 ± 0.5 vs 2.94 ± 0.9) arterial phases. CONCLUSION: Free-breathing motion-resolved XD-GRASP reconstructions provide diagnostic high-quality multiphase images in patients undergoing Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver examination.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate feasibility of free-breathing radial acquisition with respiratory motion-resolved compressed sensing reconstruction [extra-dimensional golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging (XD-GRASP)] for multiphase dynamic gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced liver imaging, and to compare image quality to compressed sensing reconstruction with respiratory motion-averaging (GRASP) and prior conventional breath-held Cartesian-sampled data sets [BH volume interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE)] in same patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective study, 16 subjects underwent free-breathing continuous radial acquisition during Gd-EOB-DTPA injection and had prior BH-VIBE available. Acquired data were reconstructed using motion-averaging GRASP approach in which consecutive 84 spokes were grouped in each contrast-enhanced phase for a temporal resolution of approximately 14 seconds. Additionally, respiratory motion-resolved reconstruction was performed from the same k-space data by sorting each contrast-enhanced phase into multiple respiratory motion states using compressed sensing algorithm named XD-GRASP, which exploits sparsity along both the contrast-enhancement and respiratory-state dimensions.Contrast-enhanced dynamic multiphase XD-GRASP, GRASP, and BH-VIBE images were anonymized, pooled together in a random order, and presented to 2 board-certified radiologists for independent evaluation of image quality, with higher score indicating more optimal examination. RESULTS: The XD-GRASP reconstructions had significantly (all P < 0.05) higher overall image quality scores compared to GRASP for early arterial (reader 1: 4.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.31 ± 0.6; reader 2: 3.81 ± 0.8 vs 3.38 ± 0.9) and late arterial (reader 1: 4.5 ± 0.6 vs 3.63 ± 0.6; reader 2: 3.56 ± 0.5 vs 2.88 ± 0.7) phases of enhancement for both readers. The XD-GRASP also had higher overall image quality score in portal venous phase, which was significant for reader 1 (4.44 ± 0.5 vs 3.75 ± 0.8; P = 0.002). In addition, the XD-GRASP had higher overall image quality score compared to BH-VIBE for early (reader 1: 4.3 ± 0.6 vs 3.88 ± 0.6; reader 2: 3.81 ± 0.8 vs 3.50 ± 1.0) and late (reader 1: 4.5 ± 0.6 vs 3.44 ± 0.6; reader 2: 3.56 ± 0.5 vs 2.94 ± 0.9) arterial phases. CONCLUSION: Free-breathing motion-resolved XD-GRASP reconstructions provide diagnostic high-quality multiphase images in patients undergoing Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver examination.
Authors: J E van Montfoort; B Stieger; D K Meijer; H J Weinmann; P J Meier; K E Fattinger Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: B Hamm; T Staks; A Mühler; M Bollow; M Taupitz; T Frenzel; K J Wolf; H J Weinmann; L Lange Journal: Radiology Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Christoph J Zech; Luigi Grazioli; Josy Breuer; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: Invest Radiol Date: 2008-07 Impact factor: 6.016
Authors: Renate Hammerstingl; Alexander Huppertz; Josy Breuer; Thomas Balzer; Anthony Blakeborough; Rick Carter; Lluis Castells Fusté; Gertraud Heinz-Peer; Werner Judmaier; Michael Laniado; Riccardo M Manfredi; Didier G Mathieu; Dieter Müller; Koenraad Mortelè; Peter Reimer; Maximilian F Reiser; Philip J Robinson; Kohkan Shamsi; Michael Strotzer; Matthias Taupitz; Bernd Tombach; Gianluca Valeri; Bernhard E van Beers; Thomas J Vogl Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2007-12-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jakob Weiss; Jana Taron; Ahmed E Othman; Robert Grimm; Matthias Kuendel; Petros Martirosian; Christer Ruff; Christina Schraml; Konstantin Nikolaou; Mike Notohamiprodjo Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-06-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Li Feng; Thomas Benkert; Kai Tobias Block; Daniel K Sodickson; Ricardo Otazo; Hersh Chandarana Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-12-16 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Yi Guo; Sajan Goud Lingala; Yannick Bliesener; R Marc Lebel; Yinghua Zhu; Krishna S Nayak Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Andreas Gutzeit; Simon Matoori; Johannes M Froehlich; Constantin von Weymarn; Carolin Reischauer; Orpheus Kolokythas; Matthias Goyen; Klaus Hergan; Matthias Meissnitzer; Rosemarie Forstner; Jan D Soyka; Aleksis Doert; Dow-Mu Koh Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 5.315