Literature DB >> 26142374

Genetic Counseling: Clinical Geneticists' Views.

S Michie1, J A Smith, J Heaversedge, S Read.   

Abstract

Evaluation of genetic counseling requires a clear consensus about its objectives, which is not evident in published definitions and guidelines. This study aims to investigate clinical geneticists' beliefs and thoughts about their practice. Structured interviews with eight clinical geneticists addressed the aims, skills, and expectations of genetic counseling. Analysis of transcribed interviews revealed four key themes, with contradictory aspects: 1. Providing information that is objective, full, and accurate versus information that is contingent on circumstances and tailored to individual needs. 2. Eliciting emotion and dealing with it directly versus dampening down and containing emotion. 3. Communicating nondirectively versus directively. 4. Expecting to perform a range of sophisticated tasks while having minimal training in the necessary skills to achieve these. These results have implications for the nature of the professional role, the development of training required for it, and the evaluation of genetic counseling.

Year:  1999        PMID: 26142374     DOI: 10.1023/A:1022930215375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  20 in total

1.  Certainty and uncertainty in genetic counselling: a qualitative case study.

Authors:  J A Smith; S Michie; A Allanson; R Elwy
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2000

2.  Objectives of genetic counselling: differing views of purchasers, providers and users.

Authors:  S Michie; A Allanson; D Armstrong; J Weinman; M Bobrow; T M Marteau
Journal:  J Public Health Med       Date:  1998-12

3.  Uncertainty in the information provided during genetic counseling.

Authors:  F J van Zuuren; E C van Schie; N K van Baaren
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

4.  Genetic counselling: information given, recall and satisfaction.

Authors:  S Michie; V McDonald; T M Marteau
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct

5.  Doctor-patient interactions in oncology.

Authors:  S Ford; L Fallowfield; S Lewis
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  10. The genetic counselor as facilitator of the counselee's decision process.

Authors:  R M Antley
Journal:  Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser       Date:  1979

Review 7.  Genetic counseling.

Authors:  F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Genetic counseling: provision and reception of information.

Authors:  A Lippman-Hand; F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1979

9.  Presenting a routine screening test in antenatal care: practice observed.

Authors:  T M Marteau; J Slack; J Kidd; R W Shaw
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.427

10.  "Telling bad news": physicians and the disclosure of undesirable information.

Authors:  K M Taylor
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  1988-06
View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Challenges for providing genetic counselling in Colombian genetic clinics: the viewpoint of the physicians providing genetic consultations.

Authors:  Clemencia Rodas-Pérez; Angus Clarke; John Powell; Margaret Thorogood
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2015-06-19

3.  Letter to the Editor: Emotional Rescue.

Authors:  S Kessler
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Differences in individual approaches: communication in the familial breast cancer consultation and the effect on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lobb; Phyllis Butow; Alexandra Barratt; Bettina Meiser; Katherine Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.537

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.