Literature DB >> 26141767

Automatic ROI construction for analyzing time-signal intensity curve in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast.

Koya Fujimoto1, Yasuyuki Ueda2, Shohei Kudomi3, Teppei Yonezawa4, Yuki Fujimoto5, Katsuhiko Ueda6.   

Abstract

Our purpose in this study was to construct a 3-dimensional (3D) region of interest (ROI) for analyzing the time-signal intensity curve (TIC) semi-automatically in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (DCE-MR) imaging of the breast. DCE-MR breast imaging datasets were acquired by a 3.0-Tesla MR system with the use of a 3D fast gradient echo sequence. The essential idea in the new method was to analyze each pixel and to construct an ROI made up of pixels with similar TICs. First, an analyst selected a starting point in the contrast media-enhanced tumor. Second, we calculated Pearson's correlation coefficients (CCs) between the TIC in the starting coordinate selected by the analyst and the TIC in the other coordinates. Third, ROI pixels were selected if their CC threshold satisfied a level of coefficient variation of the ROI determined by prior research performed in our institution. We made a retrospective review of patients who underwent breast DCE-MR examination for pre-operative diagnosis. To confirm the feasibility of the resulting 3D-ROI from TIC analysis, we compared Fischer's score obtained from 3D-ROI by applying a new method to a score obtained from a manually selected 2-dimensional (2D) ROI which was used during routine clinical examination. The Fischer's scores obtained from both the automatically selected 3D-ROI and the manually selected 2D-ROI showed almost equivalent results. Thus, we considered that the new method was comparable to the conventional method. Furthermore, the new method has the potential to be used for evaluation of the extent of tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast MRI; ROI construction; TIC analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26141767     DOI: 10.1007/s12194-015-0329-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol        ISSN: 1865-0333


  22 in total

1.  Hepatic MR imaging with a dynamic contrast-enhanced isotropic volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination: feasibility, reproducibility, and technical quality.

Authors:  V S Lee; M T Lavelle; N M Rofsky; G Laub; D M Thomasson; G A Krinsky; J C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  [Usefulness of 3D-VIBE method in breast dynamic MRI: imaging parameters and contrasting effects].

Authors:  Masato Uchikoshi; Takashi Ueda; Shigeo Nishiki; Kouichi Satou; Akihiko Wada; Izumi Imaoka; Michimasa Matsuo
Journal:  Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  2003-06

3.  Computer-aided diagnosis for dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI of mass-like lesions using a multiparametric model combining a selection of morphological, kinetic, and spatiotemporal features.

Authors:  S Agliozzo; M De Luca; C Bracco; A Vignati; V Giannini; L Martincich; L A Carbonaro; A Bert; F Sardanelli; D Regge
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI for characterizing intratesticular mass lesions.

Authors:  Athina C Tsili; Maria I Argyropoulou; Loukas G Astrakas; Ekaterini A Ntoulia; Dimitrios Giannakis; Nikolaos Sofikitis; Konstantinos Tsampoulas
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Abdominal MR imaging with a volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination.

Authors:  N M Rofsky; V S Lee; G Laub; M A Pollack; G A Krinsky; D Thomasson; M M Ambrosino; J C Weinreb
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast.

Authors:  S Mussurakis; D L Buckley; A M Coady; L W Turnbull; A Horsman
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value.

Authors:  Laura Liberman; Elizabeth A Morris; Melissa Joo-Young Lee; Jennifer B Kaplan; Linda R LaTrenta; Jennifer H Menell; Andrea F Abramson; Stephen M Dashnaw; Douglas J Ballon; D David Dershaw
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer.

Authors:  Constance D Lehman; Constantine Gatsonis; Christiane K Kuhl; R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Lucy Hanna; Sue Peacock; Stanley F Smazal; Daniel D Maki; Thomas B Julian; Elizabeth R DePeri; David A Bluemke; Mitchell D Schnall
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T(1)-weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols.

Authors:  P S Tofts; G Brix; D L Buckley; J L Evelhoch; E Henderson; M V Knopp; H B Larsson; T Y Lee; N A Mayr; G J Parker; R E Port; J Taylor; R M Weisskoff
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.