Literature DB >> 8958017

Observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced MRI of the breast.

S Mussurakis1, D L Buckley, A M Coady, L W Turnbull, A Horsman.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine observer variability in the interpretation of contrast enhanced breast MRI and to evaluate its effect on the detection and differentiation of breast cancer. 57 women underwent breast MRI using spin echo and dynamic spoiled gradient-recalled sequences. Images were independently reviewed by three radiologists, two experienced and one newly trained in breast MRI interpretation. One of the experienced readers reviewed all examinations twice. Interpretation was based on lesion conspicuity, signal intensity, contour and enhancement pattern. Contrast uptake was assessed using region of interest (ROI) analysis of the dynamic images and calculation of a maximum enhancement index. Sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of malignancy irrespective of disease extent, and in the diagnosis of multifocal malignancy were estimated. 113 lesions were reported. Kappa coefficient estimations showed only a moderate agreement between the two experienced readers in rating morphological characteristics; the agreement between the newly trained reader and the experienced readers was even worse. Moreover, there was significant interobserver and intraobserver variation in the enhancement index measurements. Weighted kappa values indicated good agreement between the experienced readers in lesion and overall interpretation, excellent intraobserver agreement, but substantial disagreement between the newly trained reader and both experienced readers. All readers showed good sensitivity in cancer detection, but specificity was substantially lower. There is significant observer variability and a substantial learning curve in the interpretation of breast MRI, and variability in the ROI analysis of dynamic data. Further efforts to improve the reliability of ROI analysis and image interpretation are needed to help MRI realise its full potential in the clinical management of breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8958017     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-827-1009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  18 in total

Review 1.  The significance of quality of life in health care.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Improved fuzzy clustering algorithms in segmentation of DC-enhanced breast MRI.

Authors:  S R Kannan; S Ramathilagam; Pandiyarajan Devi; A Sathya
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Assessing heterogeneity of lesion enhancement kinetics in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  A Karahaliou; K Vassiou; N S Arikidis; S Skiadopoulos; T Kanavou; L Costaridou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 4.  [Quantitative parametric analysis of contrast-enhanced lesions in dynamic MR mammography].

Authors:  E A M Hauth; H Jaeger; S Maderwald; A Mühler; R Kimmig; M Forsting
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Evaluation of Kinetic Entropy of Breast Masses Initially Found on MRI using Whole-lesion Curve Distribution Data: Comparison with the Standard Kinetic Analysis.

Authors:  Akiko Shimauchi; Hiroyuki Abe; David V Schacht; Jian Yulei; Federico D Pineda; Sanaz A Jansen; Rajiv Ganesh; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Computerized three-class classification of MRI-based prognostic markers for breast cancer.

Authors:  Neha Bhooshan; Maryellen Giger; Darrin Edwards; Yading Yuan; Sanaz Jansen; Hui Li; Li Lan; Husain Sattar; Gillian Newstead
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Automatic ROI construction for analyzing time-signal intensity curve in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast.

Authors:  Koya Fujimoto; Yasuyuki Ueda; Shohei Kudomi; Teppei Yonezawa; Yuki Fujimoto; Katsuhiko Ueda
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2015-07-04

8.  Interpretation of positron emission mammography and MRI by experienced breast imaging radiologists: performance and observer reproducibility.

Authors:  Deepa Narayanan; Kathleen S Madsen; Judith E Kalinyak; Wendie A Berg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Morphologic blooming in breast MRI as a characterization of margin for discriminating benign from malignant lesions.

Authors:  Alan Penn; Scott Thompson; Rachel Brem; Constance Lehman; Paul Weatherall; Mitchell Schnall; Gillian Newstead; Emily Conant; Susan Ascher; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 10.  Applications and limitations of radiomics.

Authors:  Stephen S F Yip; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.609

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.