Literature DB >> 26140851

Clinically orientated classification incorporating shoulder balance for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

H B Elsebaie1, Z Dannawi2, F Altaf3, A Zaidan2, M Al Mukhtar2, M J Shaw2, A Gibson2, H Noordeen2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The achievement of shoulder balance is an important measure of successful scoliosis surgery. No previously described classification system has taken shoulder balance into account. We propose a simple classification system for AIS based on two components which include the curve type and shoulder level.
METHODS: Altogether, three curve types have been defined according to the size and location of the curves, each curve pattern is subdivided into type A or B depending on the shoulder level. This classification was tested for interobserver reproducibility and intraobserver reliability. A retrospective analysis of the radiographs of 232 consecutive cases of AIS patients treated surgically between 2005 and 2009 was also performed.
RESULTS: Three major types and six subtypes were identified. Type I accounted for 30 %, type II 28 % and type III 42 %. The retrospective analysis showed three patients developed a decompensation that required extension of the fusion. One case developed worsening of shoulder balance requiring further surgery. This classification was tested for interobserver and intraobserver reliability. The mean kappa coefficients for interobserver reproducibility ranged from 0.89 to 0.952, while the mean kappa value for intraobserver reliability was 0.964 indicating a good-to-excellent reliability.
CONCLUSIONS: The treatment algorithm guides the spinal surgeon to achieve optimal curve correction and postoperative shoulder balance whilst fusing the smallest number of spinal segments. The high interobserver reproducibility and intraobserver reliability makes it an invaluable tool to describe scoliosis curves in everyday clinical practice.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Scoliosis; Shoulder balance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26140851     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-4090-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis following segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum 5-year follow-up.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Junghoon Kim; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of the system of King et al. for the classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  R J Cummings; E A Loveless; J Campbell; S Samelson; J M Mazur
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  [Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in the treatment of scoliosis].

Authors:  G Lang; J P Steib
Journal:  J Chir (Paris)       Date:  1988 Aug-Sep

4.  Distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis: how to more effectively determine the onset of distal adding-on.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Cody Eric Bünger; Yanqun Zhang; Chunsen Wu; Haisheng Li; Ebbe Stender Hansen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Treatment of adolescent scoliosis by the Cotrel-Dubousset method.

Authors:  G Gioia; J Dubousset; A M'Rabet
Journal:  Ital J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1987-12

6.  Parents' and patients' perceptions of postoperative appearance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Patricia L Smith; Sandra Donaldson; Douglas Hedden; Benjamin Alman; Andrew Howard; Derek Stephens; James G Wright
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Panayiotis N Smyrnis; Nicholas Sekouris; George Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Posterior fusion only for thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis of more than 80 degrees: pedicle screws versus hybrid instrumentation.

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Georgios Bakaloudis; Francesco Lolli; Francesco Vommaro; Konstantinos Martikos; Patrizio Parisini
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-08-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 10.  Comparative analysis of pedicle screw versus hook instrumentation in posterior spinal fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Lawrence G Lenke; Samuel K Cho; Keith H Bridwell; Brenda Sides; Kathy Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  7 in total

1.  Predictors of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp; Georg Gosheger; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Tobias Lange; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The mechanisms underlying the variety of preoperative directionalities of shoulder tilting in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with double thoracic curve.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Bang-Ping Qian; Yong Qiu; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Ze-Zhang Zhu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Sinister! The high pre-op left shoulder is less likely to be radiographically balanced at 2 years post-op.

Authors:  Joshua T Bram; Nishank Mehta; John M Flynn; Jason B Anari; Keith D Baldwin; Burt Yaszay; Joshua M Pahys; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-11-17

4.  Is there an optimal upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) tilt angle to prevent post-operative shoulder imbalance and neck tilt in Lenke 1 and 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients?

Authors:  M K Kwan; C Y W Chan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Fulcrum flexibility of the main curve predicts postoperative shoulder imbalance in selective thoracic fusion of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Soren Ohrt-Nissen; Vijay H D Kamath; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip Kei Luk; Jason Pui Yin Cheung
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Full fusion of proximal thoracic curve helps to prevent postoperative cervical tilt in Lenke type 2 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with right-elevated shoulder.

Authors:  Jun Jiang; Bang-Ping Qian; Yong Qiu; Bin Wang; Yang Yu; Ze-Zhang Zhu
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Morphology and epidemiological study of idiopathic scoliosis among primary school students in Chaozhou, China.

Authors:  Zemin Cai; Ruibin Wu; Shukai Zheng; Zhaolong Qiu; Kusheng Wu
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 3.674

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.