Literature DB >> 22990370

Distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis: how to more effectively determine the onset of distal adding-on.

Yu Wang1, Cody Eric Bünger, Yanqun Zhang, Chunsen Wu, Haisheng Li, Ebbe Stender Hansen.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A radiographical follow-up and analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To identify appropriate radiographical parameters for measuring the extent of distal adding-on and to discuss criteria for determining the onset of distal adding-on. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is no consensus on how to determine the onset of distal adding-on in Lenke 1A scoliosis. Such questions as: "Which radiographical parameters should be used for measuring the extent of distal adding-on?" and "What criteria should be applied in determining the onset of distal adding-on?" need to be answered.
METHODS: We reviewed all the AIS cases surgically treated in an institution from 2003 through 2009. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with Lenke 1A curves who were treated with selective thoracic fusion; (2) age less than 30 years; (3) 2-year radiographical follow-up. Eight radiographical parameters were tested to see if they are potential instruments in the detection of distal adding-on.
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria. No pseudarthrosis or crankshaft phenomenon was observed in the current cohort. Five out of 8 radiographical parameters: thoracic Cobb, LIV-CSVL distance, LIV + 1-CSVL distance, thoracic AV-CSVL distance and LIV + 1 tilt angle, in the 2 years after surgery, showed significant increase. The remaining 3 parameters: LIV tilt angle, T1-CSVL distance and number of vertebrae within Cobb, however, did not show significant increase. In regard to the 5 parameters that have the potential to detect the onset of distal adding-on, we found a high correlation between every 2 of them. The correlation coefficients range from 0.504 to 0.962 (P = 0.001), suggesting that all of them are in a positive linear relationship. Regarding the criterion for determining the onset of distal adding-on, an increase of more than 10 mm in LIV-CSVL distance in the postoperative period can be considered as a the main criterion because it is unlikely to be induced by measurement errors.
CONCLUSION: LIV-CSVL distance could be an ideal parameter for measuring the extent of distal adding-on. Distal adding-on can be determined when the LIV-CSVL distance increases by 10 mm in the postoperative period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 22990370     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318273ed11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  3 in total

1.  Clinically orientated classification incorporating shoulder balance for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H B Elsebaie; Z Dannawi; F Altaf; A Zaidan; M Al Mukhtar; M J Shaw; A Gibson; H Noordeen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Selective versus hyperselective posterior fusions in Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  B Ilharreborde; E Ferrero; A Angelliaume; Y Lefèvre; F Accadbled; A L Simon; J Sales de Gauzy; K Mazda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Preventing Fusion Mass Shift Avoids Postoperative Distal Curve Adding-on in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Hideki Shigematsu; Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Mauro Bruzzone; Hiroaki Matsumori; Kin-Cheung Mak; Dino Samartzis; Keith Dip Kei Luk
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.