Literature DB >> 19219467

Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Panayiotis N Smyrnis1, Nicholas Sekouris, George Papadopoulos.   

Abstract

Existing predictive signs as available in current literature may miss potential proximal thoracic (PT) curve deterioration and shoulder imbalance, following selective main thoracic (MT) curve correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The present study is an attempt to evaluate and complement these signs, through a retrospective study of 56 AIS patients who underwent correction and fusion from 1986 till 2003 with follow-up 4-16 years. Forty-nine had fusion of MT curve, 7 of MT and PT. Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation in 45, Luque in 12. Preoperative data: MT 50 degrees (40 degrees -80 degrees), PT 25 degrees (0 degrees -50 degrees), shoulder elevation from -4 cm (right) to 2 cm (left), clavicle angle from -14 degrees to 5 degrees , PT bending correction from 0 to 100% and T1 tilt from -15 degrees to 14 degrees . We introduced the first rib index (FRI), i.e., the difference between the diameter of right and left first rib arch as a percentage of the sum of both diameters, averaging from -22.7 to 14.3%. (Minus signs refer to or predict right, while positive left shoulder elevation.) Evaluation included all predictive parameters as related principally to postoperative left shoulder elevation > or =1 cm, patient satisfaction and surgeon fulfillment. Postoperative correction MT curve 53% (23-83%) and PT 35% (0-100%). One progressive paraplegic started 40 min following normal wake-up test. Immediate decompression, full recovery. Three cases with wound infection recovered after late removal of instrumentation. Loss of correction > or =10 degrees in five. Fifteen had postoperative persisting left shoulder elevation > or =1 cm. Seven of these expressed dissatisfaction. Statistically FRI proved valuable predictive factor always in combination with previously described signs. We concluded that a postoperative left shoulder elevation >/=2 cm is a potential cause of dissatisfaction and may be prevented with thorough validation of all predictive signs, principally the FRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19219467      PMCID: PMC2899467          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-009-0902-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  16 in total

Review 1.  The idiopathic double thoracic curve pattern. Its recognition and surgical management.

Authors:  R B Winter
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Analysis of the upper thoracic curve in surgically treated idiopathic scoliosis. A new concept of the double thoracic curve pattern.

Authors:  C K Lee; F Denis; R B Winter; J E Lonstein
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H A King; J H Moe; D S Bradford; R B Winter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Indications of proximal thoracic curve fusion in thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: recognition and treatment of double thoracic curve pattern in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with segmental instrumentation.

Authors:  S I Suk; W J Kim; C S Lee; S M Lee; J H Kim; E R Chung; J H Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis.

Authors:  L G Lenke; R R Betz; J Harms; K H Bridwell; D H Clements; T G Lowe; K Blanke
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Spontaneous proximal thoracic curve correction after isolated fusion of the main thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  T R Kuklo; L G Lenke; D S Won; E J Graham; F A Sweet; R R Betz; K H Bridwell; K M Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Cross-cultural comparison of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Instrument between American and Japanese idiopathic scoliosis patients: are there differences?

Authors:  Kei Watanabe; Lawrence G Lenke; Keith H Bridwell; Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Toru Hirano; Naoto Endo; Gene Cheh; Yongjung J Kim; Marsha Hensley; Georgia Stobbs; Linda Koester
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Recognition and treatment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation.

Authors:  L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; M F O'Brien; C Baldus; K Blanke
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Correlation of radiographic, clinical, and patient assessment of shoulder balance following fusion versus nonfusion of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Timothy R Kuklo; Lawrence G Lenke; Eric J Graham; Douglas S Won; Fred A Sweet; K M Blanke; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A multicenter study analyzing the relationship of a standardized radiographic scoring system of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and the Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument.

Authors:  Philip L Wilson; Peter O Newton; Dennis R Wenger; Thomas Haher; Andrew Merola; Larry Lenke; Thomas Lowe; David Clements; Randy Betz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  25 in total

1.  Evaluation of the predictors of postoperative aggravation of shoulder imbalance in severe and rigid thoracic or thoracolumbar scoliosis.

Authors:  Lei Zang; Ning Fan; Yong Hai; S B Lu; Q J Su; J C Yang; Li Guan; Nan Kang; X L Meng; Y Z Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does patient perception of shoulder balance correlate with clinical balance?

Authors:  Antonia Matamalas; Juan Bagó; Elisabetta D'Agata; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Parameters leading to a successful radiographic outcome following surgical treatment for Lenke 2 curves.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Anna McClung; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Daniel Sucato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp; Georg Gosheger; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Tobias Lange; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Analysis of factors that affect shoulder balance after correction surgery in scoliosis: a global analysis of all the curvature types.

Authors:  Jae-Young Hong; Seung-Woo Suh; Hitesh N Modi; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Si-Young Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Postoperative shoulder imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and predictive index.

Authors:  Yilin Yang; Mingyuan Yang; Jian Zhao; Yinchuan Zhao; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Clinically orientated classification incorporating shoulder balance for the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  H B Elsebaie; Z Dannawi; F Altaf; A Zaidan; M Al Mukhtar; M J Shaw; A Gibson; H Noordeen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Taking the shoulders and pelvis into account in the preoperative classification of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents and young adults (a constructive critique of King's and Lenke's systems of classification).

Authors:  Bergoin Maurice; Gennari Jean-Marie; Tallet Jean-Michel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Do Current Recommendations for Upper Instrumented Vertebra Predict Shoulder Imbalance? An Attempted Validation of Level Selection for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Authors:  Benjamin T Bjerke; Zoe B Cheung; Grant D Shifflett; Sravisht Iyer; Peter B Derman; Matthew E Cunningham
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-06-27

10.  Sinister! The high pre-op left shoulder is less likely to be radiographically balanced at 2 years post-op.

Authors:  Joshua T Bram; Nishank Mehta; John M Flynn; Jason B Anari; Keith D Baldwin; Burt Yaszay; Joshua M Pahys; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2020-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.