Literature DB >> 33201494

Sinister! The high pre-op left shoulder is less likely to be radiographically balanced at 2 years post-op.

Joshua T Bram1, Nishank Mehta1, John M Flynn1, Jason B Anari1, Keith D Baldwin1, Burt Yaszay2, Joshua M Pahys3, Patrick J Cahill4,5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: AIS patients consider shoulder balance an important cosmetic outcome after surgery. We examined the impact of preoperative left shoulder elevation (LSE) and choice of upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) on postoperative shoulder imbalance (PostSI).
METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study utilizing a prospective AIS database. Patients had Lenke type 1-4 curves and preoperative shoulder height ≥ 1.0 cm. Patients with preoperative LSE and right shoulder elevation (RSE) were compared. Shoulder height difference < 1 cm was considered 'mild', 1-2 cm was 'moderate', and ≥ 2.0 cm was 'severe'.
RESULTS: 407 patients had ≥ 1.0 cm imbalance preoperatively, with 88 (21.6%) LSE. There were no differences in gender (p = 0.855) or age (p = 0.477). Patients with LSE more frequently had Lenke type 2 curves (43.2% vs 16.3%, p < 0.001), while preoperative RSE averaged 1.9 ± 0.9 cm versus 1.6 ± 0.5 cm for LSE (p < 0.001). Those with LSE more often had severe PostSI at 2 years (30.7% vs 5.0%, p < 0.001), and only 26.1% of patients with severe preoperative LSE corrected to mild. In contrast, most patients with RSE had mild PostSI regardless of initial imbalance. When examining only LSE patients, there was no difference in preoperative SH by final UIV (p = 0.101). Further, UIV choice did not impact the proportion of severely unbalanced patients postoperatively (p = 0.446). A PTC > 34.5° was predictive of PostSI ≥ 2.0 cm for patients with preoperative LSE.
CONCLUSION: AIS patients with preoperative LSE are less likely to achieve level shoulders postoperatively. Choice of higher UIV did not affect postoperative shoulder imbalance in this cohort. A PTC > 34.5° was predictive of severe PostSI in patients with preoperative LSE. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Proximal thoracic curve upper instrumented level; Shoulder balance; Shoulder elevation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33201494     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00236-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  29 in total

Review 1.  Choosing fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Per David Trobisch; Aaron Rich Ducoffe; Baron S Lonner; Thomas J Errico
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  Does fusion to T2 compared with T3/T4 lead to improved shoulder balance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with a double thoracic curve?

Authors:  Choon Sung Lee; Chang Ju Hwang; Dong-Ho Lee; Jae Hwan Cho
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Parameters leading to a successful radiographic outcome following surgical treatment for Lenke 2 curves.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Oliver Meier; Anna McClung; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Daniel Sucato
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Predictors of shoulder level after spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Jan Henrik Terheyden; Mark Wetterkamp; Georg Gosheger; Viola Bullmann; Ulf Liljenqvist; Tobias Lange; Albert Schulze Bövingloh; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Analysis of factors that affect shoulder balance after correction surgery in scoliosis: a global analysis of all the curvature types.

Authors:  Jae-Young Hong; Seung-Woo Suh; Hitesh N Modi; Jae-Hyuk Yang; Si-Young Park
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Postoperative shoulder imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: risk factors and predictive index.

Authors:  Yilin Yang; Mingyuan Yang; Jian Zhao; Yinchuan Zhao; Changwei Yang; Ming Li
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Surgical assessment of the proximal thoracic curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Panayiotis N Smyrnis; Nicholas Sekouris; George Papadopoulos
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Incidence and risk factors for postoperative shoulder imbalance in scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  ShengFei Zhang; Liang Zhang; XinMin Feng; HuiLin Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Postoperative shoulder imbalance in Lenke Type 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and related factors.

Authors:  Morio Matsumoto; Kota Watanabe; Noriaki Kawakami; Taichi Tsuji; Koki Uno; Teppei Suzuki; Manabu Ito; Haruhisa Yanagida; Shohei Minami; Tsutomu Akazawa
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Post-operative shoulder imbalance in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a study of clinical photographs.

Authors:  K Venugopal Menon; Haroon M Pillay; Anbuselvam M; Naveen Tahasildar; Renjit Kumar J
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2015-11-17
View more
  1 in total

1.  Does nutrition consultation in the year leading up to neuromuscular scoliosis surgery result in significant weight gain, or just a larger magnitude curve?

Authors:  Ariana T Meltzer-Bruhn; Matthew R Landrum; David A Spiegel; Patrick J Cahill; Jason B Anari; Keith D Baldwin
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2021-08-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.