Literature DB >> 26140129

Restoring Emphasis on Ambulatory Internal Medicine Training-The 3∶1 Model.

Joshua W Harrison, Astha Ramaiya, Peter Cronkright.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Resident dissatisfaction in ambulatory care training has prompted the need for new scheduling models that support a positive learning climate. INTERVENTION: We instituted a 3∶1 scheduling model for postgraduate year (PGY)-2 and PGY-3 residents. We hypothesized this model would provide a more structured ambulatory educational atmosphere, better continuity of care, and more exposure to subspecialty outpatient medicine. This model would also eliminate conflict with inpatient duties and contribute to enhance residents' satisfaction with ambulatory medicine and their ambulatory education experience. The model used weeklong ambulatory blocks every fourth week, consisting of morning continuity clinic and afternoon subspecialty clinics. The PGY-1 residents maintained a traditional schedule.
RESULTS: Residents were surveyed regarding their ambulatory experience, with an overall response rate of 73 of 80 (91%). The PGY-2 and PGY-3 responses were analyzed descriptively and compared with PGY-1 responses. Residents reported that the 3∶1 model positively affected their satisfaction with residency training in general, their satisfaction with outpatient/primary care training, and their outpatient/clinic educational experience. Residents in the 3∶1 model perceived improvements in continuity of care and in the quality of care they provided for patients. The experience in ambulatory subspecialty training was positive.
CONCLUSIONS: A 3∶1 scheduling model appears to mitigate some of the conflict between inpatient and outpatient duties. Residents agreed the new model promoted an improved ambulatory experience.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 26140129      PMCID: PMC4477574          DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00461.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Grad Med Educ        ISSN: 1949-8357


  12 in total

1.  The ecology of medical care revisited.

Authors:  L A Green; G E Fryer; B P Yawn; D Lanier; S M Dovey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-06-28       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Resident continuity clinic: an oxymoron?

Authors:  Christina E Milano; John W Saultz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Interval examination: the ambulatory long block.

Authors:  Eric J Warm
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Redesigning training for internal medicine.

Authors:  Steven E Weinberger; Lawrence G Smith; Virginia U Collier
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Changing habits of practice. Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings.

Authors:  Judith L Bowen; Stephen M Salerno; John K Chamberlain; Elizabeth Eckstrom; Helen L Chen; Suzanne Brandenburg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Ambulatory-based education in internal medicine: current organization and implications for transformation. Results of a national survey of resident continuity clinic directors.

Authors:  Mohan Nadkarni; Siddharta Reddy; Carol K Bates; Blair Fosburgh; Stewart Babbott; Eric Holmboe
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The 4∶1 schedule: a novel template for internal medicine residencies.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mariotti; Marc Shalaby; John P Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2010-12

8.  A longitudinal subspecialty experience for internal medicine residents.

Authors:  D C Randall; J Strong; R Gibbons
Journal:  Mil Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 9.  Does continuity of care improve patient outcomes?

Authors:  Michael D Cabana; Sandra H Jee
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Preparedness of internal medicine and family practice residents for treating common conditions.

Authors:  Francine C Wiest; Timothy G Ferris; Manjusha Gokhale; Eric G Campbell; Joel S Weissman; David Blumenthal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  6 in total

1.  Factors Affecting Resident Satisfaction in Continuity Clinic-a Systematic Review.

Authors:  J Stepczynski; S R Holt; M S Ellman; D Tobin; Benjamin R Doolittle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  The Impact of Block Ambulatory Scheduling on Internal Medicine Residencies: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ami L DeWaters; Hilda Loria; Helen Mayo; Alia Chisty; Oanh K Nguyen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  An Interactive Ambulatory Nephrology Curriculum for Internal Medicine Interns: Design, Implementation, and Participant Feedback.

Authors:  Alexis C Gomez; Karen M Warburton; Rachel K Miller; Dan Negoianu; Jordana B Cohen
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 8.860

4.  Restoration of resident sleep and wellness with block scheduling.

Authors:  James Bordley; Algene G Agustin; Mohamed A Ahmed; Raeesa Khalid; Anthony M Paluso; Bethany S Kobza; Aaron W Spaugy; Jonathan Emens; Sima S Desai; Akram Khan
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 5.  A Decade of Teaching and Learning in Internal Medicine Ambulatory Education: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Andrew Coyle; Ira Helenius; Christina M Cruz; E Allison Lyons; Natalie May; John Andrilli; M Merav Bannet; Rachel Pinotti; David C Thomas
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2019-04

6.  Impact of X+Y Scheduling on Pediatric Resident and Faculty Perceptions of Education and Patient Care.

Authors:  Ross E Myers; Lynn Thoreson; Heather B Howell; Kathryn Weedon; Joyce Bevington; Patricia Poitevien; Mary Beth Wroblewski; Keith Ponitz; Joanna Lewis
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.993

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.