Literature DB >> 26139495

Preliminary evaluation of the SimPORTAL major vessel injury (MVI) repair model.

Domenico Veneziano1, Lauren H Poniatowski2, Troy E Reihsen2, Robert M Sweet2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Major vessel injury (MVI) is a dangerous complication associated with laparoscopic surgery that leads, if not properly handled, to blood loss, conversion to open surgery, and eventually death. In this paper, we describe the preliminary evaluation of the SimPORTAL MVI model, created with the goal of simulating an intra-corporeal injury to a large vessel.
METHODS: For this study, we created MVI models for 17 residents (PGY 1-4). Each resident was asked to perform an intracorporeal knot on a penrose drain within a maximum time limit of 6 min (in accordance with European basic laparoscopic urological skills rules) and then to subsequently repair a vessel injury on the MVI model, which was perfused with synthetic blood, within a maximum blood loss of 3 L. During the vessel repair, low lights and pulse sounds were used to simulate the operating room environment. All participants filled out a survey pre- and post-task to score various aspects of the model.
RESULTS: We successfully created a model that simulates a critical surgical event. None of the participants reported having previous experience repairing a MVI. Six participants were able to perform the intracorporeal knot, and 12 residents (70.5%) were able to repair the MVI model under the given time and blood loss limits. Eleven participants agreed that the MVI model behaves like a real vessel, and six felt to be capable of performing the task prior to attempting it. Sixteen participants thought that the MVI model should be part of laparoscopic curriculums during residency.
CONCLUSIONS: The SimPORTAL MVI model is a feasible low-cost model that would be well appreciated as a part of laparoscopic curriculum for residents. Minor improvements, including pressure measurement in the vessel for task assessment, will be made in the future, and further studies are necessary to definitively validate this model.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Education; Laparoscopy; Major vessel injury (MVI); Robotics; Simulation; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26139495     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4344-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  11 in total

1.  Development and validation of a comprehensive program of education and assessment of the basic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Peters; Gerald M Fried; Lee L Swanstrom; Nathaniel J Soper; Lelan F Sillin; Bruce Schirmer; Kaaren Hoffman
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.982

2.  Introduction and validation of the American Urological Association Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery skills curriculum.

Authors:  Robert M Sweet; Rebekah Beach; Francois Sainfort; Priyanka Gupta; Troy Reihsen; Lauren H Poniatowski; Elspeth M McDougall
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 3.  Mechanical simulators for training for laparoscopic surgery in urology.

Authors:  Jens Rassweiler; Jan Klein; Dogu Teber; Michael Schulze; Thomas Frede
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Validity and acceptability of a high-fidelity physical simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Authors:  Lauren H Poniatowski; J Stuart Wolf; Stephen Y Nakada; Troy E Reihsen; François Sainfort; Robert M Sweet
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Development, validation and operating room-transfer of a six-step laparoscopic training program for the vesicourethral anastomosis.

Authors:  Jan Klein; Dogu Teber; Tom Frede; Christian Stock; Marcel Hruza; Ali Gözen; Othmar Seemann; Michael Schulze; Jens Rassweiler
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Complications in surgical patients.

Authors:  Mark A Healey; Steven R Shackford; Turner M Osler; Frederick B Rogers; Elizabeth Burns
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2002-05

7.  Bleeding complications in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Incidence, mechanisms, prevention and management.

Authors:  Robin Kaushik
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.407

8.  Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures.

Authors:  H Xu; Y Chen; Y Li; Q Zhang; D Wang; Z Liang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Techniques for laparoscopic repair of major intraoperative vascular injury: case reports and review of literature.

Authors:  Mehraneh D Jafari; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Meta-analysis of the complications of laparoscopic renal surgery: comparison of procedures and techniques.

Authors:  Gyan Pareek; Sean P Hedican; Jason R Gee; Reginald C Bruskewitz; Stephen Y Nakada
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  1 in total

1.  Simulation platforms to assess laparoscopic suturing skills: a scoping review.

Authors:  Elif Bilgic; Motaz Alyafi; Tomonori Hada; Tara Landry; Gerald M Fried; Melina C Vassiliou
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.