Literature DB >> 11982478

Complications in surgical patients.

Mark A Healey1, Steven R Shackford, Turner M Osler, Frederick B Rogers, Elizabeth Burns.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Complications are common in hospitalized surgical patients. Provider error contributes to a significant proportion of these complications.
DESIGN: Surgical patients were concurrently observed for the development of explicit complications. All complications were reviewed by the attending surgeon and other members of the service and evaluated for the severity of sequelae (major or minor) and for whether the complication resulted from medical error (avoidable) or not.
SETTING: University teaching hospital with a level I trauma designation. PATIENTS: All inpatients (operative or nonoperative) from 4 different surgical services: general surgery, combined general surgery and trauma, vascular surgery, and cardiothoracic surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total complication rate (number of complications divided by the number of patients) and the number of patients with complications. Complications were separated into those with major or minor sequelae and the proportion of each type that were due to medical error (avoidable). Rates of complications in a recent Institute of Medicine report were used as a criterion standard.
RESULTS: The data for the respective groups (general surgery, vascular surgery, combined general surgery and trauma, and cardiothoracic surgery) are as follows. The number of patients was 1363, 978, 914, and 1403; number of complications, 413, 409, 295, and 378; total complication rate, 30.3%, 42.4%, 32.3%, and 26.9%; minor complication rate, 13.3%, 19.9%, 13.5%, and 13.0% (percentage of minor complications that were avoidable, 37.4%, 59.0%, 51.2%, and 49.5%); major complication rate, 16.2%, 21.1%, 18.1%, and 12.9% (percentage of major complications that were avoidable, 53.4%, 60.7%, 38.8%, and 38.7%); and mortality rate, 1.83%, 3.33%, 2.28%, and 3.34% (percentage of mortality that was avoidable, 28.0%, 44.1%, 19.0%, and 25.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite mortality rates that compare favorably with national benchmarks, a prospective examination of surgical patients reveals complication rates that are 2 to 4 times higher than those identified in an Institute of Medicine report. Almost half of these adverse events were judged contemporaneously by peers to be due to provider error (avoidable). Errors in care contributed to 38 (30%) of 128 deaths. Recognition that provider error contributes significantly to adverse events presents significant opportunities for improving patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11982478     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.137.5.611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  58 in total

1.  Transparent and open discussion of errors does not increase malpractice risk in trauma patients.

Authors:  Ronald M Stewart; Michael G Corneille; Joe Johnston; Kathy Geoghegan; John G Myers; Daniel L Dent; Marilyn McFarland; Joshua Alley; Basil A Pruitt; Stephen M Cohn
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement.

Authors:  Charles Vincent; Krishna Moorthy; Sudip K Sarker; Avril Chang; Ara W Darzi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Surgery in safe hands.

Authors:  Raghvinder Pal Singh Gambhir
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Reducing potentially avoidable complications in patients with chronic diseases: the Prometheus Payment approach.

Authors:  Francois De Brantes; Amita Rastogi; Michael Painter
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  The registration of complications in surgery: a learning curve.

Authors:  Eelco J Veen; Maryska L G Janssen-Heijnen; Loek P H Leenen; Jan A Roukema
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  The influence of non-technical performance on technical outcome in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A Mishra; K Catchpole; T Dale; P McCulloch
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-05-04       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Relationship between functional end-to-end anastomosis for colon cancer and surgical site infections.

Authors:  Hitoshi Ojima; Makoto Sohda; Hiroyuki Ando; Akihiko Sano; Yasuyuki Fukai; Atsushi Ogawa; Yasushi Mochida; Hiroyuki Kuwano
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.549

8.  Preliminary evaluation of the SimPORTAL major vessel injury (MVI) repair model.

Authors:  Domenico Veneziano; Lauren H Poniatowski; Troy E Reihsen; Robert M Sweet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Noninvasive acoustic manipulation of objects in a living body.

Authors:  Mohamed A Ghanem; Adam D Maxwell; Yak-Nam Wang; Bryan W Cunitz; Vera A Khokhlova; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Medical errors and consequent adverse events in critically ill surgical patients in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Delhi.

Authors:  Sunil Kumar; Sujata Chaudhary
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2009-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.