Literature DB >> 17287919

Complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for invasive cervical cancer: experience based on 317 procedures.

H Xu1, Y Chen, Y Li, Q Zhang, D Wang, Z Liang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This report presents the incidence of complications and conversions during laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy performed for invasive cervical carcinoma. The data are analyzed, and strategies to help prevent future complications are discussed.
METHODS: From July 2000 to December 2005 at the authors' institution, 317 laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy procedures for invasive cervical carcinoma were performed. The authors reviewed the database of patients who underwent laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy to examine complications and analyze factors associated with conversion to an open surgical procedure.
RESULTS: All but four surgical procedures were laparoscopically completed. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed for all the remaining 313 patients, 143 of whom underwent paraaortic lymphadenectomy. Major and minor intraoperative complications occurred for 4.4% (n = 14) of the patients. The overall conversion rate was 1.3% (n = 4), including 3 emergencies and 1 elective conversion. Seven patients had vessel injuries, five of which were repaired or treated laparoscopically. One left external iliac vein required laparotomy, and one patient underwent laparotomy to control bleeding sites. Operative cystotomies occurred in five patients, which were repaired laparoscopically. Two patients underwent laparotomy because of hypercapnia and ascending colon injury. Postoperative surgery complications occurred in 5.1% (n = 16) of the patients, including 5 patients with ureterovaginal fistula, 4 with vesicovaginal fistula requiring reoperation, 1 with ureterostenosis treated by placement of a double-J ureteral stent, and 6 with bladder dysfunctions (retention) that exhibited complete resolution within 3 to 6 months by intermittent training and catheterization.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy is becoming a routine procedure in the armamentarium of many gynecologists. Complications unique to laparoscopy do exist, but they decrease with repeated training of the procedure and gradually enriched experiences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17287919     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9129-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopically assisted vaginal radical hysterectomy with pelvic and paraaortic node dissection.

Authors:  C R Nezhat; F R Nezhat; M O Burrell; C E Ramirez; C Welander; J Carrodeguas; C H Nezhat
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  1993

2.  Laparoscopic assistance for extended radicality of radical vaginal hysterectomy: description of a technique.

Authors:  M Possover; N Krause; R Kühne-Heid; A Schneider
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  [Clinical analysis of laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy treated patients with gynecological malignancies].

Authors:  Zhiqing Liang; Huicheng Xu; Guangwu Xiong; Yuyan Li; Yong Chen; Lin Wang; Wei He; Changxu Shi
Journal:  Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2002-11

4.  Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer.

Authors:  M S Piver; F Rutledge; J P Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  A comparison of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  M P Milad; K Morrison; A Sokol; D Miller; L Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-12-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: A Preliminary Report

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc       Date:  1994-08

7.  A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  H Steed; B Rosen; J Murphy; S Laframboise; D De Petrillo; A Covens
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Laparoscopic para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy: experience with 150 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  M Possover; N Krause; K Plaul; R Kühne-Heid; A Schneider
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Laparoscopic staging of the patient with incompletely staged early adenocarcinoma of the endometrium.

Authors:  J M Childers; N M Spirtos; P Brainard; E A Surwit
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (type III) with aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with stage I cervical cancer: surgical morbidity and intermediate follow-up.

Authors:  Nick M Spirtos; Scott M Eisenkop; John B Schlaerth; Samuel C Ballon
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  12 in total

1.  Urologic complications of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Jong Ha Hwang; Myong Cheol Lim; Jae Young Joung; Sang-Soo Seo; Sokbom Kang; Ho Kyung Seo; Jinsoo Chung; Sang-Yoon Park
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Preliminary evaluation of the SimPORTAL major vessel injury (MVI) repair model.

Authors:  Domenico Veneziano; Lauren H Poniatowski; Troy E Reihsen; Robert M Sweet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Systematic review of urological injury during caesarean section and hysterectomy.

Authors:  Gavin Wei; Frances Harley; Michael O'Callaghan; James Adshead; Derek Hennessey; Ned Kinnear
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 1.932

4.  A cohort study evaluating paraaortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Haiyan Zhang; Zhi Zuo; Ye Wang; Li Wang; Zhiling Zhu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Vaginal-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: rationale, technique, results.

Authors:  Elisabeth Gottschalk; Malgorzata Lanowska; Vito Chiantera; Simone Marnitz; Achim Schneider; Verena Brink-Spalink; Kati Hasenbein; Christhardt Koehler
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Impact of hospital care volume on clinical outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Banghyun Lee; Kidong Kim; Youngmi Park; Myong Cheol Lim; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Systematic Review of Topical Hemostatic Agent Use in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Traci E Ito; Alexandra L Martin; Edith F Henderson; Jeremy T Gaskins; Vida M Vaughn; Shan M Biscette; Resad P Pasic
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Morbidity after surgical management of cervical cancer in low and middle income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Emma R Allanson; Aime Powell; Max Bulsara; Hong Lim Lee; Lynette Denny; Yee Leung; Paul Cohen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Robotic radical hysterectomy versus total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for treatment of early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Farr R Nezhat; M Shoma Datta; Connie Liu; Linus Chuang; Konstantin Zakashansky
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  A collagen-fibrin patch (Tachosil®) for the prevention of symptomatic lymphoceles after pelvic lymphadenectomy in women with gynecologic malignancies: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Christoph Grimm; Stephan Polterauer; Samir Helmy; David Cibula; Michal Zikan; Alexander Reinthaller; Clemens Tempfer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.