Literature DB >> 24320223

Validity and acceptability of a high-fidelity physical simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Lauren H Poniatowski1, J Stuart Wolf, Stephen Y Nakada, Troy E Reihsen, François Sainfort, Robert M Sweet.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective was to determine the acceptability and preliminary construct validity for a high-fidelity synthetic renal pelvis/ureter tissue analogue model for use as a simulation model for training of laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The pyeloplasty model was designed with incorporated assessment lines for use in post-task Black Light Assessment of Surgical Technique (BLAST)™. Practicing urologists participating in the 2011 and 2012 American Urological Association Mentored Renal Laparoscopy courses performed a simulated laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedure and completed a post-task evaluation of the model.
RESULTS: Practicing urologists found the model acceptable and rated the model favorably in terms of content and face validity. Urologists who had performed a laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedure in the last 5 years outperformed those who had not by demonstrating increased patency (P<0.05), decreased twisting (P<0.05), and decreased leakage (P<0.10) at the anastomosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The BLAST™ pyeloplasty model demonstrated evidence of acceptability and content, face, and construct validity for training practicing urologists to perform laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24320223     DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0678

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  6 in total

1.  Training model for laparoscopic Heller and Dor fundoplication: a tool for laparoscopic skills training and assessment-construct validity using the GOALS score.

Authors:  Omar Bellorin; Anna Kundel; Saurabh Sharma; Alexander Ramirez-Valderrama; Paul Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Preliminary evaluation of the SimPORTAL major vessel injury (MVI) repair model.

Authors:  Domenico Veneziano; Lauren H Poniatowski; Troy E Reihsen; Robert M Sweet
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  3D printing technology and its role in urological training.

Authors:  Brandon Smith; Prokar Dasgupta
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  Simulation-based training and assessment in urological surgery.

Authors:  Abdullatif Aydin; Nicholas Raison; Muhammad Shamim Khan; Prokar Dasgupta; Kamran Ahmed
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  3D Printed Organ Models for Surgical Applications.

Authors:  Kaiyan Qiu; Ghazaleh Haghiashtiani; Michael C McAlpine
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2018-03-28       Impact factor: 10.745

6.  STELA (Smart TV and smartphone-basEd Laparoscopy TrAiner): a no-cost home-based trainer for beginners.

Authors:  J S Sandhu; Puneet Aggarwal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2020-04-30
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.