Literature DB >> 26137044

Tumor size and lymph node status determined by imaging are reliable factors for predicting advanced cervical cancer prognosis.

Min Sun Kyung1, Hong Bae Kim2, Jung Yeob Seoung3, In Young Choi4, Young Soo Joo5, Me Yeon Lee6, Jung Bae Kang1, Young Han Park3.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the prognostic role of a number of clinical factors in advanced cervical cancer patients. Patients (n=157) with stage IIA-IIB cervical cancer treated at four Hallym Medical Centers in South Korea (Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital; Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital; Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital; and Kangdong Sacred Heart Hospital) between 2006 and 2010 were retrospectively enrolled. Univariate analysis identified significant predictive values in the following eight factors: i) Cancer stage (P<0.0001); ii) tumor size (≤4 vs. 4-6 cm, P=0.0147; and ≤4 vs. >6 cm, P<0.0001); iii) serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen level (≤2 vs. >15 ng/ml; P=0.0291); iv) lower third vaginal involvement (P<0.0001); v) hydronephrosis (P=0.0003); vi) bladder/rectum involvement (P=0.0015); vii) pelvic (P=0.0017) or para-aortic (P=0.0019) lymph node (LN) metastasis detected by imaging vs. no metastasis; and viii) pelvic LN metastasis identified by pathological analysis (P=0.0289). Furthermore, multivariate analysis determined that tumor size (≤4 vs. 4-6 cm, P=0.0371; and ≤4 vs. >6 cm, P=0.0024) and pelvic LN metastasis determined by imaging vs. no metastasis (P=0.0499) were independent predictive variables. Therefore, tumor size and pelvic LN metastasis measured by imaging were independent predictive factors for the prognosis of advanced cervical cancer. These factors may provide more clinically significant prognostic information compared with the currently used International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system.

Entities:  

Keywords:  pelvic lymph node; prognosis; tumor size; uterine cervical cancer

Year:  2015        PMID: 26137044      PMCID: PMC4467330          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  41 in total

1.  Staging of cervical cancer.

Authors:  H E Averette; J H Ford; R C Dudan; R E Girtanner; W J Hoskins; M H Lutz
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Youth as a prognostic factor in carcinoma of the cervix: a matched analysis.

Authors:  F N Rutledge; M F Mitchell; M Munsell; S Bass; V McGuffee; E N Atkinson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Long-term follow-up of the first randomized trial using neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage Ib squamous carcinoma of the cervix: the final results.

Authors:  J E Sardi; A Giaroli; C Sananes; M Ferreira; A Soderini; A Bermudez; L Snaidas; S Vighi; N Gomez Rueda; G di Paola
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Impact of palliative urinary diversion by percutaneous nephrostomy drainage and ureteral stenting among patients with advanced cervical cancer and obstructive uropathy: a prospective cohort.

Authors:  Marie Carmela M Lapitan; Brian S Buckley
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  The staging of cervical cancer: inevitable discrepancies between clinical staging and pathologic findinges.

Authors:  J R Van Nagell; J W Roddick; D M Lowin
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1971-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Tumor diameter and volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of outcome for invasive cervical cancer.

Authors:  H C Wagenaar; J B Trimbos; S Postema; A Anastasopoulou; R J van der Geest; J H Reiber; G G Kenter; A A Peters; P M Pattynama
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Preoperative serum SCC, CA125, and CA19-9 levels and lymph node status in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  Mahito Takeda; Noriaki Sakuragi; Kazuhira Okamoto; Yukiharu Todo; Shin-Ichiro Minobe; Eiji Nomura; Hiroaki Negishi; Mamoru Oikawa; Ritsu Yamamoto; Seiichiro Fujimoto
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Prognostic nomogram for overall survival in stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Jen-Yu Tseng; Ming-Shien Yen; Nae-Fong Twu; Chiung-Ru Lai; Huann-Cheng Horng; Chien-Chih Tseng; Kuan-Chong Chao; Chi-Mou Juang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Prognostic significance of pretreatment serum levels of squamous cell carcinoma antigen and CA 125 in cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  E H Avall-Lundqvist; K Sjövall; B R Nilsson; P H Eneroth
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 10.  The serum assay of tumour markers in the prognostic evaluation, treatment monitoring and follow-up of patients with cervical cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Angiolo Gadducci; Roberta Tana; Stefania Cosio; Andrea Riccardo Genazzani
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 6.312

View more
  9 in total

1.  Strain elastography as an early predictor of long-term prognosis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancers treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Yan Xu; Lijing Zhu; Li Zhu; Huanhuan Wang; Tong Ru; Baorui Liu; Jian He; Sibo Tian; Zhengyang Zhou; Xiaofeng Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  TUC338 promotes cell migration and invasion by targeting TIMP1 in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Qin Li; Feiyang Shen; Chenghai Wang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Laparoscopic paraaortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a single-center experience.

Authors:  D Vázquez-Vicente; B Fernández Del Bas; J García Villayzán; H A Di Fiore; J Luna Tirado; V Casado Echarren; J García-Foncillas; J Plaza Arranz; L Chiva
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Usefulness of the maximum standardized uptake value for the diagnosis and staging of patients with cervical cancer undergoing positron emission tomography/computed tomography.

Authors:  Hiroaki Takagi; Jinichi Sakamoto; Yasuhiro Osaka; Takeo Shibata; Satoko Fujita; Toshiyuki Sasagawa
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.817

5.  An Innovative Immune Score-Based Prognostic Nomogram for Patients with Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Xingling Qi; Yipeng Fu; Meng Zhang; Chong Lu; Yumeng Wang; Jing Peng; Guiling Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Conditional relative survival of cervical cancer: a Korean National Cancer Registry Study.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Jaeman Bae; Johyun Ha; Kyu Won Jung
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Prognostic value of tumor measurement parameters and SCC-Ag changes in patients with locally-advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Wenjuan Chen; Siyi Xiu; Xingyun Xie; Huiming Guo; Yuanji Xu; Penggang Bai; Xiaoyi Xia
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Radiological evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in carcinoma cervix with emphasis on their infiltrative pattern.

Authors:  Ekta Dhamija; Akhil Baby; Neerja Bhatla; Vishnu Prasad Pulappadi; Mukesh Kumar; Sunesh Kumar; Lalit Kumar; Dayanand Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.274

9.  Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonography in Tumor Size: Evaluation of Equality in Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Sigit Purbadi; Lisa Novianti; Gregorius Tanamas; Trifonia Pingkan Siregar
Journal:  J Med Ultrasound       Date:  2021-07-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.