Literature DB >> 9345358

Long-term follow-up of the first randomized trial using neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage Ib squamous carcinoma of the cervix: the final results.

J E Sardi1, A Giaroli, C Sananes, M Ferreira, A Soderini, A Bermudez, L Snaidas, S Vighi, N Gomez Rueda, G di Paola.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine if three courses consisting of 50 mg/m2 cis-platinum, 1 mg/m2 vincristine, and 25 mg/m2 bleomycin (day 1-3) at 10-day intervals can improve survival before Wertheim-Meigs + radiotherapy. MATERIAL: Two hundred five unselected stage Ib patients (having tumors > 2 cm in diameter) were divided into two groups at random: (1) The group control consisted of 103 patients (56 bulky, > 4 cm diameter) treated with Wertheim-Meigs (if the tumor was resectable with free surgical margins) + adjuvant radiotherapy to whole pelvis (extended field radiation was used only in patients with paraaortic lymph node metastases). When the tumor was unresectable, a surgical staging was performed and radiotherapy was the chosen treatment. (2) Neoadjuvant (102 patients, 61 bulky) had neoadjuvant chemotherapy and then the same treatment as the control patients.
RESULTS: After 67 (31-102) months of follow-up, no difference was seen in tumors > 2 and < 4 cm in both groups (C = 77% vs N = 82%), but statistically significant differences were seen in survival and disease-free survival, in bulky tumors, and between patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy + Wertheim-Meigs + radiotherapy (80%) and the control (61%). This was due to an increased operability that was substantially improved in bulky tumors in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group (61/61, 100%) vs control (48/56, 85%; P < 0.01). After 7 years of follow-up, the outcome of the unresectable bulky control group of patients is significantly worse (14%) than that of the resectable group (69%; P < 0.001). With regard to recurrences, a significant decrease in pelvic failures in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group was observed (P < 0.001). Survival was improved in bulky resectable cases (N = 81% vs C = 69%, P < 0.05). Pathological findings for the surgical specimens revealed differences between both groups because all the risk factors such as parametrial and lymph node metastases, tumor bulk, and vascular embolism had been decreased (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can improve survival because of increased operability with free survival margins and a decrease in pathologic risk factors in unselected, bulky (> 4 cm diameter) stage Ib patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9345358     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1997.4812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  46 in total

Review 1.  Management of gynaecological cancers.

Authors:  A Melville; A Eastwood; J Kleijnen; H Kitchener; P Martin-Hirsch; L Nelson
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1999-12

2.  Changing Practice of Gynecologic Oncology based on Current Evidence.

Authors:  Hemant B Tongaonkar
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

Review 3.  Advanced Vulvar Cancers: What are the Best Options for Treatment?

Authors:  Alejandro Soderini; Alejandro Aragona; Nicholas Reed
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 5.075

4.  Pros and Cons of Adding of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Standard Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Regional Cancer Center Experience.

Authors:  Satya Narayan; Neeti Sharma; Akhil Kapoor; Rajani Sharma; Narendra Kumar; Mukesh Singhal; Ramesh Purohit; Shankar Lal Jakhar; Surendra Beniwal; Harvindra Singh Kumar; Ajay Sharma
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-07-11

Review 5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Larysa Rydzewska; Jayne Tierney; Claire L Vale; Paul R Symonds
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-12-12

6.  Pulmonary toxicity after a quick course of combinatorial vincristine, bleomycin, and cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kyung-Do Ki; Jong-Min Lee; Seon-Kyung Lee; Seo-Yun Tong; Chu-Yeop Huh; Jung-Kyu Ryu; Kyo-Young Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  The safety and efficacy of the preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Du He; Chunyan Duan; Jun Chen; Lin Lai; Jiaquan Chen; Dian Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

8.  Survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus radiotherapy in locally advanced chemoresistant cervical cancer.

Authors:  Youn Seok Choi; Jeong-Im Sin; Ju Hyun Kim; Gi Won Ye; Im Hee Shin; Tae Sung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Feasibility and safety of carboplatin plus paclitaxel as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a pilot study.

Authors:  Roberto Angioli; Francesco Plotti; Daniela Luvero; Alessia Aloisi; Federica Guzzo; Stella Capriglione; Corrado Terranova; Carlo De Cicco Nardone; Pierluigi Benedetti-Panici
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-03

10.  Glassy cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix responsive to neoadjuvant intraarterial chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tomonori Nagai; Takashi Okubo; Riko Sakaguchi; Hiroyuki Seki; Satoru Takeda
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.