Literature DB >> 29671223

Laparoscopic paraaortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a single-center experience.

D Vázquez-Vicente1, B Fernández Del Bas2, J García Villayzán2, H A Di Fiore3, J Luna Tirado2, V Casado Echarren2, J García-Foncillas2, J Plaza Arranz2, L Chiva4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for paraaortic lymph node staging in locally advanced cervical carcinoma. The second aim was to identify prognostic factors in the evolution of this disease and to evaluate how the results of the surgery modify the oncological treatment of patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 59 patients diagnosed with locally advanced cervical cancer International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB2-IVA who underwent laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy at our hospital between 2009 and 2015. Depending on the results of the paraaortic lymphadenectomy, treatment consisted of pelvic- or extended-field chemoradiotherapy.
RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 52.3 years. The median operative time was 180 min. The mean hospital stay was 1.7 days. The mean number of paraaortic lymph nodes excised was 16.4. Eight patients (13.5%) had positive paraaortic lymph nodes. Thirteen patients (22%) underwent surgery via the transperitoneal route, and 46 (78%) underwent surgery via the retroperitoneal route. The sensitivity and specificity of computerized axial tomography (CT) scanning for detecting paraaortic lymph node involvement was 75 and 86%, respectively. The statistically significant prognostic factors that affected survival were surgical paraaortic lymph node involvement, radiological pelvic lymph node involvement, and radiological tumor size as assessed with nuclear magnetic resonance. The rate of serious complications was 1.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Pretherapeutic laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma allows the adaption of radiotherapy fields to avoid false-positive and false-negative imaging results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy; Locally advanced cervical cancer; Para-aortic surgical staging

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29671223     DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-1878-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol        ISSN: 1699-048X            Impact factor:   3.405


  14 in total

1.  Pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of bulky or locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Gil-Moreno; Silvia Franco-Camps; Silvia Cabrera; Assumpció Pérez-Benavente; Xavier Martínez-Gómez; Angel Garcia; Jordi Xercavins
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Therapeutic value of pretherapeutic extraperitoneal laparoscopic staging of locally advanced cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Eric Leblanc; Fabrice Narducci; Michael Frumovitz; Anne Lesoin; Bernard Castelain; Marie C Baranzelli; Sophie Taieb; Charles Fournier; Denis Querleu
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Diagnostic performance of computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computer tomography for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hyuck Jae Choi; Woong Ju; Seung Kwon Myung; Yeol Kim
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 6.716

4.  Waiting for radiotherapy in Ontario.

Authors:  W J Mackillop; H Fu; C F Quirt; P Dixon; M Brundage; Y Zhou
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1994-08-30       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Tumor size and lymph node status determined by imaging are reliable factors for predicting advanced cervical cancer prognosis.

Authors:  Min Sun Kyung; Hong Bae Kim; Jung Yeob Seoung; In Young Choi; Young Soo Joo; Me Yeon Lee; Jung Bae Kang; Young Han Park
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 6.  Nodal-staging surgery for locally advanced cervical cancer in the era of PET.

Authors:  Sebastien Gouy; Philippe Morice; Fabrice Narducci; Catherine Uzan; Jennifer Gilmore; Hélène Kolesnikov-Gauthier; Denis Querleu; Christine Haie-Meder; Eric Leblanc
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Location of aortic node metastases in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  A Gil-Moreno; J F Magrina; A Pérez-Benavente; B Díaz-Feijoo; J L Sánchez-Iglesias; A García; S Cabrera-Díaz; O Puig; X Martínez-Gómez; J Xercavins
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-02-12       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Laparoscopic extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a prospective correlation of surgical findings with positron emission tomography/computed tomography findings.

Authors:  Pedro T Ramirez; Anuja Jhingran; Homer A Macapinlac; Elizabeth D Euscher; Mark F Munsell; Robert L Coleman; Pamela T Soliman; Kathleen M Schmeler; Michael Frumovitz; Lois M Ramondetta
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Prognostic significance of histology and positive lymph node involvement following radical hysterectomy in carcinoma of the cervix.

Authors:  O Kenneth Macdonald; Jergin Chen; Mark Dodson; Christopher M Lee; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.339

10.  Surgical versus radiographic determination of para-aortic lymph node metastases before chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  Michael A Gold; Chunqiao Tian; Charles W Whitney; Peter G Rose; Rachelle Lanciano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Conventional Laparoscopy versus Robotic-Assisted Aortic Lymph-Nodal Staging for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mariano Catello Di Donna; Vincenzo Giallombardo; Giuseppina Lo Balbo; Giuseppe Cucinella; Giulio Sozzi; Vito Andrea Capozzi; Antonino Abbate; Antonio Simone Laganà; Simone Garzon; Vito Chiantera
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study.

Authors:  Simone Marnitz; Audrey Tieko Tsunoda; Peter Martus; Marcelo Vieira; Renato Jose Affonso Junior; João Nunes; Volker Budach; Hermann Hertel; Alexander Mustea; Jalid Sehouli; Jens-Peter Scharf; Uwe Ulrich; Andreas Ebert; Iris Piwonski; Christhardt Kohler
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.437

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.