Literature DB >> 29395798

Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.

Aimilia Gastounioti1, Andrew Oustimov2, Meng-Kang Hsieh2, Lauren Pantalone2, Emily F Conant2, Despina Kontos2.   

Abstract

RATIONALE AND
OBJECTIVES: We evaluate utilizing convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to optimally fuse parenchymal complexity measurements generated by texture analysis into discriminative meta-features relevant for breast cancer risk prediction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: With Institutional Review Board approval and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance, we retrospectively analyzed "For Processing" contralateral digital mammograms (GE Healthcare 2000D/DS) from 106 women with unilateral invasive breast cancer and 318 age-matched controls. We coupled established texture features (histogram, co-occurrence, run-length, structural), extracted using a previously validated lattice-based strategy, with a multichannel CNN into a hybrid framework in which a multitude of texture feature maps are reduced to meta-features predicting the case or control status. We evaluated the framework in a randomized split-sample setting, using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) to assess case-control discriminatory capacity. We also compared the framework to CNNs directly fed with mammographic images, as well as to conventional texture analysis, where texture feature maps are summarized via simple statistical measures that are then used as inputs to a logistic regression model.
RESULTS: Strong case-control discriminatory capacity was demonstrated on the basis of the meta-features generated by the hybrid framework (AUC = 0.90), outperforming both CNNs applied directly to raw image data (AUC = 0.63, P <.05) and conventional texture analysis (AUC = 0.79, P <.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that informative interactions between patterns exist in texture feature maps derived from mammographic images, which can be extracted and summarized via a multichannel CNN architecture toward leveraging the associations of textural measurements to breast cancer risk.
Copyright © 2018 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital mammography; breast cancer risk; convolutional neural network; parenchymal texture

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29395798      PMCID: PMC6026048          DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Radiol        ISSN: 1076-6332            Impact factor:   3.173


  32 in total

1.  Unsupervised Deep Learning Applied to Breast Density Segmentation and Mammographic Risk Scoring.

Authors:  Michiel Kallenberg; Kersten Petersen; Mads Nielsen; Andrew Y Ng; Christian Igel; Celine M Vachon; Katharina Holland; Rikke Rass Winkel; Nico Karssemeijer; Martin Lillholm
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Valerie A McCormack; Isabel dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the Guernsey prospective studies.

Authors:  Gabriela Torres-Mejía; Bianca De Stavola; Diane S Allen; Juan J Pérez-Gavilán; Jorge M Ferreira; Ian S Fentiman; Isabel Dos Santos Silva
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  Breast cancer screening in an era of personalized regimens: a conceptual model and National Cancer Institute initiative for risk-based and preference-based approaches at a population level.

Authors:  Tracy Onega; Elisabeth F Beaber; Brian L Sprague; William E Barlow; Jennifer S Haas; Anna N A Tosteson; Mitchell D Schnall; Katrina Armstrong; Marilyn M Schapira; Berta Geller; Donald L Weaver; Emily F Conant
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 6.  Clinical Diagnosis and Management of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth S McDonald; Amy S Clark; Julia Tchou; Paul Zhang; Gary M Freedman
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 10.057

7.  Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Armando Manduca; Michael J Carston; John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy R Brandt; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Characterizing mammographic images by using generic texture features.

Authors:  Lothar Häberle; Florian Wagner; Peter A Fasching; Sebastian M Jud; Katharina Heusinger; Christian R Loehberg; Alexander Hein; Christian M Bayer; Carolin C Hack; Michael P Lux; Katja Binder; Matthias Elter; Christian Münzenmayer; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Martina Meier-Meitinger; Boris R Adamietz; Michael Uder; Matthias W Beckmann; Thomas Wittenberg
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Preliminary evaluation of the publicly available Laboratory for Breast Radiodensity Assessment (LIBRA) software tool: comparison of fully automated area and volumetric density measures in a case-control study with digital mammography.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Jinbo Chen; Dania Daye; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Mammographic density and structural features can individually and jointly contribute to breast cancer risk assessment in mammography screening: a case-control study.

Authors:  Rikke Rass Winkel; My von Euler-Chelpin; Mads Nielsen; Kersten Petersen; Martin Lillholm; Michael Bachmann Nielsen; Elsebeth Lynge; Wei Yao Uldall; Ilse Vejborg
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.430

View more
  10 in total

1.  Gist processing in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Chia-Chien Wu; Nicholas M D'Ardenne; Robert M Nishikawa; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-12-18

Review 2.  CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Ravi K Samala; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Application of GIS Spatial Analysis and Scanning Statistics in the Gynecological Cancer Clustering Pattern and Risk Screening: A Case Study in Northern Jiangxi Province, China.

Authors:  Zhiwei Wan; Yaqi Wang; Chunhong Deng
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2020-08-10

Review 4.  Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications: Breast Imaging.

Authors:  Qiyuan Hu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.947

5.  Comparison of Breast MRI Tumor Classification Using Human-Engineered Radiomics, Transfer Learning From Deep Convolutional Neural Networks, and Fusion Methods.

Authors:  Heather M Whitney; Hui Li; Yu Ji; Peifang Liu; Maryellen L Giger
Journal:  Proc IEEE Inst Electr Electron Eng       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 10.961

Review 6.  Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Krzysztof J Geras; Ritse M Mann; Linda Moy
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Automated position and size selection of round applicators for AccuBoost breast brachytherapy.

Authors:  Foster L West; Reshma Munbodh; John C Patrick; Mark J Rivard; Sean A Roles; Ziad H Saleh
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2020-12-16

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence in mammographic phenotyping of breast cancer risk: a narrative review.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Shyam Desai; Vinayak S Ahluwalia; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2022-02-20       Impact factor: 8.408

9.  Application of convolutional neural networks to breast biopsies to delineate tissue correlates of mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Maeve Mullooly; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Andrew Beck; Mark E Sherman; Gretchen L Gierach; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Shaoqi Fan; Maya Palakal; Manila Hada; Pamela M Vacek; Donald L Weaver; John A Shepherd; Bo Fan; Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh; Jeff Wang; Serghei Malkov; Jason M Johnson; Sally D Herschorn; Brian L Sprague; Stephen Hewitt; Louise A Brinton; Nico Karssemeijer; Jeroen van der Laak
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2019-11-19

10.  Automated Breast Cancer Detection in Digital Mammograms of Various Densities via Deep Learning.

Authors:  Yong Joon Suh; Jaewon Jung; Bum-Joo Cho
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2020-11-06
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.