Literature DB >> 30963275

Image-based biomarkers for solid tumor quantification.

Peter Savadjiev1, Jaron Chong2, Anthony Dohan2,3, Vincent Agnus4, Reza Forghani2,5, Caroline Reinhold2, Benoit Gallix6,7.   

Abstract

The last few decades have witnessed tremendous technological developments in image-based biomarkers for tumor quantification and characterization. Initially limited to manual one- and two-dimensional size measurements, image biomarkers have evolved to harness developments not only in image acquisition technology but also in image processing and analysis algorithms. At the same time, clinical validation remains a major challenge for the vast majority of these novel techniques, and there is still a major gap between the latest technological developments and image biomarkers used in everyday clinical practice. Currently, the imaging biomarker field is attracting increasing attention not only because of the tremendous interest in cutting-edge therapeutic developments and personalized medicine but also because of the recent progress in the application of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to large-scale datasets. Thus, the goal of the present article is to review the current state of the art for image biomarkers and their use for characterization and predictive quantification of solid tumors. Beginning with an overview of validated imaging biomarkers in current clinical practice, we proceed to a review of AI-based methods for tumor characterization, such as radiomics-based approaches and deep learning.Key Points• Recent years have seen tremendous technological developments in image-based biomarkers for tumor quantification and characterization.• Image-based biomarkers can be used on an ongoing basis, in a non-invasive (or mildly invasive) way, to monitor the development and progression of the disease or its response to therapy.• We review the current state of the art for image biomarkers, as well as the recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for image processing and analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence (AI); Biomarkers; Computer-assisted image interpretation; Computer-assisted image processing; Diagnostic imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30963275     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-019-06169-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  47 in total

1.  Editorial: Would You Like A Hypothesis With Those Data? Omics and the Age of Discovery Science.

Authors:  W Lee Kraus
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-11

Review 2.  Use of new imaging techniques to predict tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa N Harry; Scott I Semple; David E Parkin; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 3.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 4.  Artificial intelligence in radiology.

Authors:  Ahmed Hosny; Chintan Parmar; John Quackenbush; Lawrence H Schwartz; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 60.716

5.  Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype.

Authors:  Joost J M van Griethuysen; Andriy Fedorov; Chintan Parmar; Ahmed Hosny; Nicole Aucoin; Vivek Narayan; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Steve Pieper; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with PET Imaging Using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Petros-Pavlos Ypsilantis; Musib Siddique; Hyon-Mok Sohn; Andrew Davies; Gary Cook; Vicky Goh; Giovanni Montana
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Deep Learning based Radiomics (DLR) and its usage in noninvasive IDH1 prediction for low grade glioma.

Authors:  Zeju Li; Yuanyuan Wang; Jinhua Yu; Yi Guo; Wei Cao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Non-invasive tumor genotyping using radiogenomic biomarkers, a systematic review and oncology-wide pathway analysis.

Authors:  Robin W Jansen; Paul van Amstel; Roland M Martens; Irsan E Kooi; Pieter Wesseling; Adrianus J de Langen; Catharina W Menke-Van der Houven van Oordt; Bernard H E Jansen; Annette C Moll; Josephine C Dorsman; Jonas A Castelijns; Pim de Graaf; Marcus C de Jong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2018-04-13

Review 9.  The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in Precision Medicine: A Review.

Authors:  Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 10.  Imaging intratumor heterogeneity: role in therapy response, resistance, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Chris J Rose; John C Waterton; Richard A D Carano; Geoff J M Parker; Alan Jackson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  CT and MRI of pancreatic tumors: an update in the era of radiomics.

Authors:  Marion Bartoli; Maxime Barat; Anthony Dohan; Sébastien Gaujoux; Romain Coriat; Christine Hoeffel; Christophe Cassinotto; Guillaume Chassagnon; Philippe Soyer
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 2.  Conventional and artificial intelligence-based imaging for biomarker discovery in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Jérémy Dana; Aïna Venkatasamy; Antonio Saviano; Joachim Lupberger; Yujin Hoshida; Valérie Vilgrain; Pierre Nahon; Caroline Reinhold; Benoit Gallix; Thomas F Baumert
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 9.029

3.  SegChaNet: A Novel Model for Lung Cancer Segmentation in CT Scans.

Authors:  Mehmet Akif Cifci
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 4.  Radiomics in stratification of pancreatic cystic lesions: Machine learning in action.

Authors:  Vipin Dalal; Joseph Carmicheal; Amaninder Dhaliwal; Maneesh Jain; Sukhwinder Kaur; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Malignancy risk stratification of cystic renal lesions based on a contrast-enhanced CT-based machine learning model and a clinical decision algorithm.

Authors:  Jérémy Dana; Thierry L Lefebvre; Peter Savadjiev; Sylvain Bodard; Simon Gauvin; Sahir Rai Bhatnagar; Reza Forghani; Olivier Hélénon; Caroline Reinhold
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Radiomics in hepatocellular carcinoma: a quantitative review.

Authors:  Taiga Wakabayashi; Farid Ouhmich; Cristians Gonzalez-Cabrera; Emanuele Felli; Antonio Saviano; Vincent Agnus; Peter Savadjiev; Thomas F Baumert; Patrick Pessaux; Jacques Marescaux; Benoit Gallix
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2019-08-31       Impact factor: 9.029

7.  Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant small renal masses among Asian population.

Authors:  Lin Shen; Yanyan Li; Na Li; Yajie Zhao; Qin Zhou; Zhanzhan Li
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  Joint Imaging Platform for Federated Clinical Data Analytics.

Authors:  Jonas Scherer; Marco Nolden; Jens Kleesiek; Jasmin Metzger; Klaus Kades; Verena Schneider; Michael Bach; Oliver Sedlaczek; Andreas M Bucher; Thomas J Vogl; Frank Grünwald; Jens-Peter Kühn; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Jörg Kotzerke; Oliver Bethge; Lars Schimmöller; Gerald Antoch; Hans-Wilhelm Müller; Andreas Daul; Konstantin Nikolaou; Christian la Fougère; Wolfgang G Kunz; Michael Ingrisch; Balthasar Schachtner; Jens Ricke; Peter Bartenstein; Felix Nensa; Alexander Radbruch; Lale Umutlu; Michael Forsting; Robert Seifert; Ken Herrmann; Philipp Mayer; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Tobias Penzkofer; Bernd Hamm; Winfried Brenner; Roman Kloeckner; Christoph Düber; Mathias Schreckenberger; Rickmer Braren; Georgios Kaissis; Marcus Makowski; Matthias Eiber; Andrei Gafita; Rupert Trager; Wolfgang A Weber; Jakob Neubauer; Marco Reisert; Michael Bock; Fabian Bamberg; Jürgen Hennig; Philipp Tobias Meyer; Juri Ruf; Uwe Haberkorn; Stefan O Schoenberg; Tristan Kuder; Peter Neher; Ralf Floca; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Klaus Maier-Hein
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-11

9.  Implementation of eHealth and AI integrated diagnostics with multidisciplinary digitized data: are we ready from an international perspective?

Authors:  Mark Bukowski; Robert Farkas; Oya Beyan; Lorna Moll; Horst Hahn; Fabian Kiessling; Thomas Schmitz-Rode
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Medical Imaging Biomarker Discovery and Integration Towards AI-Based Personalized Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Yaru Pang; Hui Wang; He Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.244

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.