Literature DB >> 26116431

Influence of Ankle Position and Radiographic Projection Angle on Measurement of Supramalleolar Alignment on the Anteroposterior and Hindfoot Alignment Views.

Alexej Barg1, Richard L Amendola1, Heath B Henninger1, Ashley L Kapron2, Charles L Saltzman2, Andrew E Anderson3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Using digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs), we determined how changes in the x-ray beam projection angle from the horizon, tibiotalar joint angle, and axial rotation of the foot influenced measurements of the medial distal tibial angle (MDTA) on the anteroposterior (AP) and hindfoot alignment views (HAV).
METHODS: Seven cadaver foot-ankle specimens were scanned by computed tomography (CT) at fixed tibiotalar joint positions, ranging from 15 degrees of dorsiflexion to 25 degrees of plantarflexion. DRRs were created from each CT scan to simulate alterations in the horizontal projection angle (0 to 25 degrees) and foot axial rotation (-30 to 30 degrees). The MDTA was measured on each DRR and compared with that quantified on the baseline HAV and AP view.
RESULTS: Altering the horizontal projection angle by ≥5 degrees and >10 degrees significantly altered the MDTA for the AP view and the HAV, respectively. Shifting dorsiflexion and plantarflexion caused minor changes in the MDTA that were only statistically significant for the HAV. Axial rotation significantly changed the MDTA on both views, but deviations were more pronounced for the HAV.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the HAV, the MDTA on the AP view was less sensitive to changes in foot-ankle position. However, increasing the tilt of the x-ray beam from the horizon altered the MDTA on the AP view substantially. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To avoid misinterpretation of the MDTA, we recommend using the AP view to quantify supramalleolar alignment as it is less sensitive to changes in positioning of the foot-ankle. When acquiring an AP film, the x-ray beam should be directed along the horizon to ensure consistent assessment of the MDTA across patients.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alignment; ankle; digitally reconstructed radiographs; medial distal tibia angle; radiographs

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26116431     DOI: 10.1177/1071100715591091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  15 in total

1.  [Supramalleolar osteotomy in asymmetric ankle osteoarthritis : Short-term clinical and radiographic results].

Authors:  A Barg; M Wiewiorski; J Paul; M Wurm; M Jacxsens; K Nykytina; V Valderrabano
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Torque application helps to diagnose incomplete syndesmotic injuries using weight-bearing computed tomography images.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Travis L Bailey; Angela P Presson; Chelsea McCarty Allen; Heath B Henninger; Charles L Saltzman; Alexej Barg
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The horizontal calcaneofibular ligament: a sign of hindfoot valgus on ankle MRI.

Authors:  Sangoh Lee; Ines Oliveira; Ian Pressney; Matthew Welck; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Reliability and correlation analysis of computed methods to convert conventional 2D radiological hindfoot measurements to a 3D setting using weightbearing CT.

Authors:  A Burssens; J Peeters; M Peiffer; R Marien; T Lenaerts; G Vandeputte; J Victor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Imaging of the subtalar joint: A novel approach to an old problem.

Authors:  Nicola Krähenbühl; Amy L Lenz; Rich Lisonbee; Manja Deforth; Lukas Zwicky; Beat Hintermann; Charles L Saltzman; Andrew E Anderson; Alexej Barg
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Weightbearing Computed Tomography for Assessment of Foot and Ankle Deformities: The Iowa Experience.

Authors:  Edward O Rojas; Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur; Kevin Dibbern; Matthieu Lalevee; Elijah Auch; Eli Schmidt; Victoria Vivtcharenko; Shuyuan Li; Phinit Phisitkul; John Femino; Cesar de Cesar Netto
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2021

Review 7.  Preoperative Guidance With Weight-Bearing Computed Tomography and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Authors:  Jacob Zeitlin; Jensen Henry; Scott Ellis
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-07

Review 8.  Weight-bearing cone-beam computed tomography in the foot and ankle specialty: where we are and where we are going - an update.

Authors:  Alexandre Leme Godoy-Santos; Alessio Bernasconi; Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues; François Lintz; Carlos Felipe Teixeira Lôbo; Cesar de Cesar Netto
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2021 May-Jun

9.  Is Lower-limb Alignment Associated with Hindfoot Deformity in the Coronal Plane? A Weightbearing CT Analysis.

Authors:  Arne B M Burssens; Kris Buedts; Alexej Barg; Elizabeth Vluggen; Patrick Demey; Charles L Saltzman; Jan M K Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  WEIGHT-BEARING CONE BEAM CT SCANS AND ITS USES IN ANKLE, FOOT, AND KNEE: AN UPDATE ARTICLE.

Authors:  Carlos Felipe Teixeira Lôbo; Marcelo Bordalo-Rodrigues
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.