Literature DB >> 34552412

Weightbearing Computed Tomography for Assessment of Foot and Ankle Deformities: The Iowa Experience.

Edward O Rojas1, Nacime Salomao Barbachan Mansur1, Kevin Dibbern1, Matthieu Lalevee1, Elijah Auch1, Eli Schmidt1, Victoria Vivtcharenko1, Shuyuan Li1, Phinit Phisitkul2, John Femino1, Cesar de Cesar Netto1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) is a reliable and precise modality for the measurement and analysis of bone position in the foot and ankle, as well as associated deformities. WBCT to assess three dimensional relationships among bones allowed the development of new measurements, as the Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO), which has high inter and intra-rater reliability. This study reports the University of Iowa's experience utilizing WBCT for the care of foot and ankle patients by describing its utility across different orthopedic diseases in improving diagnostic assessment, aiding surgical planning, and expanding the use for objective clinical follow-up.
METHODS: The medical records of consecutive patients with various foot and ankle disorders that underwent WBCT examination as part of the standard of care at a single institution between November 2014 and August 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient factors, including body mass index (BMI), sex, and patient comorbidities were collected. 3D coordinates for calculation of FAO were harvested using the Multiplanar Reconstruction (MPR) views were calculated from the obtained exams. Descriptive statistics were performed with Shapiro-Wilk test and the Anderson-Darling tests.
RESULTS: 1175 feet and ankles (820 patients) had a WBCT performed over the studied 68 months. 53% of the subjects were male and 47% female. 588 of the acquisitions were from the right side (50.04%) and 587 from the left side (49.96%). Diabetes was present in 15.47% of, Rheumatic diagnoses in 4.52% and smoking habits in 44.10% of patients. Mean BMI of the sample was found to be 32.47 (32.03-32.90, 95% CI). The mean Foot and Ankle Offset (FAO) encountered in the study's population was 2.43 (2.05-2.82, 95% CI; min -30.8, max 37.65; median 2.39).
CONCLUSION: This study contains the largest cohort of WBCTs with accompanied FAO measurements to date, which can aid with establishing a new baseline FAO measurement for multiple pathological conditions. Acquiring WBCTs resulted in a variety of more specific diagnoses for patient with foot and ankle complaints. The ability to utilize WBCT for presurgical planning, the capability to provide a 3D reconstruction of patient anatomy, and its use for assessment of advanced relational foot and ankle measurements, such as FAO, demonstrate how WBCT may serve as a remarkable utility in clinical practice and has become a standard of care in our practice at the University of Iowa.Level of Evidence: IV.
Copyright © The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  foot ankle offset; weight-bearing ct

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34552412      PMCID: PMC8259196     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  30 in total

1.  Upright weight-bearing CT of the knee during flexion: changes of the patellofemoral and tibiofemoral articulations between 0° and 120°.

Authors:  Anna Hirschmann; Florian M Buck; Ramin Herschel; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Sandro F Fucentese
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Results of more than 11,000 scans with weightbearing CT - Impact on costs, radiation exposure, and procedure time.

Authors:  Martinus Richter; Francois Lintz; Cesar de Cesar Netto; Alexej Barg; Arne Burssens
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.705

3.  Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of cone beam weightbearing semi-automatic three-dimensional measurements in symptomatic pes cavovarus.

Authors:  Alessio Bernasconi; Lucy Cooper; Shirley Lyle; Shelain Patel; Nicholas Cullen; Dishan Singh; Matthew Welck
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 2.705

4.  3D Biometrics for Hindfoot Alignment Using Weightbearing CT.

Authors:  François Lintz; Matthew Welck; Alessio Bernasconi; James Thornton; Nicholas P Cullen; Dishan Singh; Andy Goldberg
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 2.827

5.  Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography for syndesmosis injury diagnosis compared to conventional computed tomography.

Authors:  Marion Hamard; Angeliki Neroladaki; Ilias Bagetakos; Victor Dubois-Ferrière; Xavier Montet; Sana Boudabbous
Journal:  Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.705

6.  Weight-bearing computed tomography findings in varus ankle osteoarthritis: abnormal internal rotation of the talus in the axial plane.

Authors:  Ji-Beom Kim; Young Yi; Jae-Young Kim; Jae-Ho Cho; Min-Soo Kwon; Seung-Hyuk Choi; Woo-Chun Lee
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Weightbearing CT Scan Assessment of Foot Alignment in Patients With Hallux Rigidus.

Authors:  Zoe B Cheung; Mark S Myerson; Joseph Tracey; Ettore Vulcano
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.827

8.  Range of Normal and Abnormal Syndesmotic Measurements Using Weightbearing CT.

Authors:  Noortje Catharina Hagemeijer; Song Ho Chang; Mohamed Elghazy Abdelaziz; Jack Christopher Casey; Gregory Richard Waryasz; Daniel Guss; Christopher William DiGiovanni
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  3D Biometrics for Hindfoot Alignment Using Weightbearing Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jian Zhong Zhang; François Lintz; Alessio Bernasconi; Shu Zhang
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2019-03-10       Impact factor: 2.827

10.  Three-Dimensional Biometrics to Correlate Hindfoot and Knee Coronal Alignments Using Modern Weightbearing Imaging.

Authors:  Louis Dagneaux; Maryama Dufrenot; Alessio Bernasconi; Nicholas A Bedard; Cesar de Cesar Netto; François Lintz
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.827

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Ankle osteoarthritis: comprehensive review and treatment algorithm proposal.

Authors:  Mario Herrera-Pérez; Victor Valderrabano; Alexandre L Godoy-Santos; César de César Netto; David González-Martín; Sergio Tejero
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2022-07-05
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.