Literature DB >> 27861214

Body Mass Hides the Curve: Thoracic Scoliometer Readings Vary by Body Mass Index Value.

Adam Margalit1, Greg McKean, Adam Constantine, Carol B Thompson, Rushyuan Jay Lee, Paul D Sponseller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidelines suggest referral for scoliosis when rib slope (scoliometer measurement, angle of trunk rotation) is ≥7 degrees. We hypothesized that overweight and obese patients would have lower scoliometer measurements compared with normal-weight and underweight patients for a given spinal curvature, causing overweight and obese patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis to present for treatment later and with larger curves. Our goal was to determine the association between scoliometer readings and major curve magnitudes in relation to body mass index (BMI).
METHODS: This retrospective cohort study at a tertiary referral center included 483 patients (420 girls) aged 10 to 18 years (mean age, 14±1.6 y) with thoracic adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who presented to 1 orthopaedic surgeon for initial evaluation of spinal deformity from 2010 to 2015. Records were reviewed for BMI percentile for age and sex (underweight, ≤fourth percentile; normal weight, fifth to 84th percentile; overweight, 85th to 94th percentile; obese, ≥95th percentile), patient characteristics, thoracic scoliometer measurements, and thoracic major curves.
RESULTS: Of the 483 patients, 23 were underweight, 372 were normal weight, 52 were overweight, and 36 were obese. Obese patients had a larger mean major curve (44 degrees) than normal-weight patients (34 degrees) (P=0.004). The odds of presenting with a major curve ≥20 degrees were 4.9 (95% confidence interval, 1.1-22; P=0.037) times higher for obese versus normal-weight patients. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of major curves (≥20 vs. <20 degrees) estimated the scoliometer values with the greatest sensitivity and specificity to be 8 degrees for underweight patients, 7 degrees for normal-weight patients, 6 degrees for overweight patients, and 5 degrees for obese patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Obese patients presented with larger thoracic curves versus normal-weight patients. Differences in chest-wall thickness in patients with different BMI values may alter scoliometer measurements for a given rotational deformity. Our data suggest new referral criteria for the scoliometer test based on BMI values. Specifically, obese patients should be referred at an angle of trunk rotation of 5 degrees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27861214      PMCID: PMC5422115          DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  19 in total

1.  A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test.

Authors:  P Côté; B G Kreitz; J D Cassidy; A K Dzus; J Martel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Criteria for screening: are the effects predictable?

Authors:  J I Williams
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Scoliosis screening. An approach to cost/benefit analysis.

Authors:  M A Ashworth; J A Hancock; L Ashworth; K A Tessier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Outcome of spinal screening.

Authors:  W P Bunnell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Selective screening for scoliosis.

Authors:  William P Bunnell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Decreased orthotic effectiveness in overweight patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Patrick J O'Neill; Lori A Karol; Michael K Shindle; Emily E Elerson; Karlynn M BrintzenhofeSzoc; Donald E Katz; Kevin W Farmer; Paul D Sponseller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Presentation of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Bigger the Kid, the Bigger the Curve.

Authors:  Christine M Goodbody; Wudbhav N Sankar; John M Flynn
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.324

8.  Scoliosis prevalence: a call for a statement of terms.

Authors:  W J Kane
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Voluntary school screening for scoliosis in Minnesota.

Authors:  J E Lonstein; S Bjorklund; M H Wanninger; R P Nelson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  The direct cost of "Thriasio" school screening program.

Authors:  Theodoros B Grivas; Elias S Vasiliadis; Christina Maziotou; Olga D Savvidou
Journal:  Scoliosis       Date:  2007-05-14
View more
  4 in total

1.  Ethnic Disparity in the Incidence of Scoliosis Among Adolescents in Tianzhu Tibetan Autonomous County, China.

Authors:  Haibin Guo; Nan Chen; Yuqi Yang; Xuan Zhou; Xin Li; Yan Jiang; Jiaoling Huang; Qing Du
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-04-27

2.  The first study of epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis shows lower prevalence in females of Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Authors:  Hemender Singh; Varun Sharma; Indu Sharma; Akash Sharma; Sonakshi Modeel; Nital Gupta; Geetanjali Gupta; Ajay K Pandita; Mohammad Farooq Butt; Rajesh Sharma; Sarla Pandita; Vinod Singh; Ekta Rai; Shiro Ikegawa; Swarkar Sharma
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 3.  Is There a Relationship between Idiopathic Scoliosis and Body Mass? A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dalila Scaturro; Agnese Balbo; Fabio Vitagliani; Leonardo Stramazzo; Lawrence Camarda; Giulia Letizia Mauro
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.706

4.  Annual Observation of Changes in the Angle of Trunk Rotation. Trunk Asymmetry Predictors. A Study from a Scoliosis Screening in School Adolescents.

Authors:  Katarzyna Adamczewska; Marzena Wiernicka; Ewa Kamińska; Joanna Małecka; Agata Dąbrowska; Ewa Malchrowicz-Mośko
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.