| Literature DB >> 28702395 |
Mauro Costa Morais Tavares Junior1, Felipe Ribeiro Ledur1, Olavo Biraghi Letaif1, Raphael Martus Marcon2, Alexandre Fogaça Cristante2, Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de Barros Filho2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the anatomical and radiological characteristics of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with surgical indication.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescent; Scoliosis/anatomy & histology; Scoliosis/radiography; Treatment outcome
Year: 2017 PMID: 28702395 PMCID: PMC5497017 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.04.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Fig. 1Patients age.
Apical vertebra.
| Frequency | Percentage | Valid percentage | Accumulated percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| T10 | 4 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 17.9 |
| T11 | 2 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 25.0 |
| T12 | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 28.6 |
| T6 | 2 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 35,7 |
| T7 | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 39.3 |
| T8 | 10 | 35.7 | 35.7 | 75.0 |
| T9 | 7 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 100.0 |
| Total | 28 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
Stable vertebra.
| Frequency | Percentage | Valid percentage | Accumulated percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | 2 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 7.1 |
| L2 | 2 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 14.3 |
| L3 | 6 | 21.4 | 21.4 | 35.7 |
| L4 | 7 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 60.7 |
| L5 | 4 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 75.0 |
| T11 | 4 | 14.3 | 14.3 | 89.3 |
| T12 | 3 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 100.0 |
| Total | 28 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
Neutral cephalad vertebra.
| Frequency | Percentage | Valid percentage | Accumulated percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T10 | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| T11 | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 7.1 |
| T3 | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 10.7 |
| T4 | 3 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 21.4 |
| T5 | 9 | 32.1 | 32.1 | 53.6 |
| T6 | 7 | 25.0 | 25.0 | 78.6 |
| T7 | 5 | 17.9 | 17.9 | 96.4 |
| T9 | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 100.0 |
| Total | 28 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
Neutral caudal vertebra.
| Frequency | Percentage | Valid percentage | Accumulated percentage (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | 10 | 35.7 | 35.7 | 35.7 |
| L2 | 6 | 21.4 | 21.4 | 57.1 |
| L4 | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 60.7 |
| L5 | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 64.3 |
| T11 | 5 | 17.9 | 17.9 | 82.1 |
| T12 | 5 | 17.9 | 17.9 | 100.0 |
| Total | 28 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |
Fig. 2T5–T12 kyphosis.
Fig. 3Example of measurements in AIS.
Lenke classification.
| Frequency | Percentage | Valid percentage | Cumulative frequency (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 − A | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| 1 − B | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 7.1 |
| 1 N A | 2 | 7.1 | 7.1 | 14.3 |
| 1 N B | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 17.9 |
| 1 N C | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 21.4 |
| 2 − C | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 25.0 |
| 2 N A | 3 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 35.7 |
| 2 N B | 3 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 46.4 |
| 2 N C | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 50.0 |
| 3 + C | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 53.6 |
| 3 N B | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 57.1 |
| 3 N C | 3 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 67.9 |
| 4 + A | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 71.4 |
| 4 + B | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 75.0 |
| 4 N A | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 78.6 |
| 4 N B | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 82.1 |
| 4 N C | 3 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 92.9 |
| 6 N B | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 96.4 |
| 6 N C | 1 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 100.0 |
| Total | 28 | 100.0 | 100.0 | |