| Literature DB >> 26114217 |
Qingen Meng1, Jing Wang2, Peiran Yang2, Zhongmin Jin3, John Fisher4.
Abstract
Lubrication plays an important role in the clinical performance of the ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) hip implant in terms of reducing wear and avoiding squeaking. All the previous lubrication analyses of CoC hip implants assumed that synovial fluid was sufficiently supplied to the contact area. The aim of this study was to investigate the lubrication performance of the CoC hip implant under starved conditions. A starved lubrication model was presented for the CoC hip implant. The model was solved using multi-grid techniques. Results showed that the fluid film thickness of the CoC hip implant was affected by fluid supply conditions: with the increase in the supplied fluid layer, the lubrication film thickness approached to that of the fully blooded solution; when the available fluid layer reduced to some level, the fluid film thickness considerably decreased with the supplying condition. The above finding provides new insights into the lubrication performance of hip implants.Entities:
Keywords: Ceramic-on-ceramic; Hip implant; Lubrication; Starvation; Tribology
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26114217 PMCID: PMC4570925 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater ISSN: 1878-0180
Fig. 1A ball-in-socket configuration for the starved lubrication analysis of the CoC hip implant.
Material properties of titanium shell, ceramic and equivalent support layer used in the present study.
| Elastic modulus (GPa) | Poisson׳s ratio | |
|---|---|---|
| Titanium | 110 | 0.3 |
| Equivalent support layer | 2.27 | 0.23 |
| Ceramic | 380 | 0.26 |
Fig. 2The flowchart of P and θf iteration.
Fig. 3The three-dimensional distributions for the fluid pressure p (a), fractional film content θf (b), and fluid film thickness hf (c) (hfluid=0.12 μm).
Fig. 4The fluid pressure, total gap, film thickness and fractional film content along the entraining direction (hfluid=0.12 μm).
Fig. 5The effect of increasing the thickness of the supplied fluid layer on the fluid film thickness: (a) along the entraining direction and (b) along the leakage direction.
Fig. 6The effect of reducing the thickness of the supplied fluid layer on the fluid film thickness: (a) along the entraining direction and (b) along the leakage direction.
Fig. 7The variation in the central film thickness with the thickness of the inlet fluid layer