E J Smit1, E-J Vonken2, F J A Meijer3, J W Dankbaar2, A D Horsch2, B van Ginneken3, B Velthuis2, I van der Schaaf2, M Prokop3. 1. From the Department of Radiology (E.J.S., E.-j.V., J.W.D., A.D.H., B.V., I.v.d.S.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands Department of Radiology (E.J.S., F.J.A.M, B.v.G., M.P.), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. ewoudsmit@gmail.com. 2. From the Department of Radiology (E.J.S., E.-j.V., J.W.D., A.D.H., B.V., I.v.d.S.), University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. 3. Department of Radiology (E.J.S., F.J.A.M, B.v.G., M.P.), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Timing-invariant (or delay-insensitive) CT angiography derived from CT perfusion data may obviate a separate cranial CTA in acute stroke, thus enhancing patient safety by reducing total examination time, radiation dose, and volume of contrast material. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of timing-invariant CTA for detecting intracranial artery occlusion in acute ischemic stroke, to examine whether standard CTA can be omitted. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with suspected ischemic stroke were prospectively enrolled and underwent CTA and CTP imaging at admission. Timing-invariant CTA was derived from the CTP data. Five neuroradiologic observers assessed all images for the presence and location of intracranial artery occlusion in a blinded and randomized manner. Sensitivity and specificity of timing-invariant CTA and standard CTA were calculated by using an independent expert panel as the reference standard. Interrater agreement was determined by using κ statistics. RESULTS: We included 108 patients with 47 vessel occlusions. Overall, standard CTA and timing-invariant CTA provided similar high diagnostic accuracy for occlusion detection with a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 90%-100%) and a specificity of 100% (99%-100%) for standard CTA and a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI, 94%-100%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) for timing-invariant CTA. For proximal large-vessel occlusions, defined as occlusions of the ICA, basilar artery, and M1, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) for both techniques. Interrater agreement was good for both techniques (mean κ value, 0.75 and 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Timing-invariant CTA derived from CTP data provides diagnostic accuracy similar to that of standard CTA for the detection of artery occlusions in acute stroke.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Timing-invariant (or delay-insensitive) CT angiography derived from CT perfusion data may obviate a separate cranial CTA in acute stroke, thus enhancing patient safety by reducing total examination time, radiation dose, and volume of contrast material. We assessed the diagnostic accuracy of timing-invariant CTA for detecting intracranial artery occlusion in acute ischemic stroke, to examine whether standard CTA can be omitted. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients with suspected ischemic stroke were prospectively enrolled and underwent CTA and CTP imaging at admission. Timing-invariant CTA was derived from the CTP data. Five neuroradiologic observers assessed all images for the presence and location of intracranial artery occlusion in a blinded and randomized manner. Sensitivity and specificity of timing-invariant CTA and standard CTA were calculated by using an independent expert panel as the reference standard. Interrater agreement was determined by using κ statistics. RESULTS: We included 108 patients with 47 vessel occlusions. Overall, standard CTA and timing-invariant CTA provided similar high diagnostic accuracy for occlusion detection with a sensitivity of 96% (95% CI, 90%-100%) and a specificity of 100% (99%-100%) for standard CTA and a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI, 94%-100%) and a specificity of 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) for timing-invariant CTA. For proximal large-vessel occlusions, defined as occlusions of the ICA, basilar artery, and M1, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% CI, 100%-100%) for both techniques. Interrater agreement was good for both techniques (mean κ value, 0.75 and 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Timing-invariant CTA derived from CTP data provides diagnostic accuracy similar to that of standard CTA for the detection of artery occlusions in acute stroke.
Authors: Ewoud J Smit; Evert-jan Vonken; Irene C van der Schaaf; Adrienne M Mendrik; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Alexander D Horsch; Tom van Seeters; Bram van Ginneken; Mathias Prokop Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-02-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Corinne E A Balemans; Louis J M Reichert; Bert I H van Schelven; Jan A J G van den Brand; Jack F M Wetzels Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-04-24 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ewoud J Smit; Evert-jan Vonken; Tom van Seeters; Jan Willem Dankbaar; Irene C van der Schaaf; L Jaap Kappelle; Bram van Ginneken; Birgitta K Velthuis; Mathias Prokop Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-06-11 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Andreas M J Frölich; Sarah Lena Wolff; Marios N Psychogios; Ernst Klotz; Ramona Schramm; Katrin Wasser; Michael Knauth; Peter Schramm Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Francesca M Chappell; Joanna M Wardlaw; Gavin R Young; Jonathan H Gillard; Giles H Roditi; Brigitte Yip; Jill P Pell; Peter M Rothwell; Martin M Brown; Michael J Gough; Marc S Randall Journal: Radiology Date: 2009-03-10 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Anna Mm Boers; Ivo Gh Jansen; Olvert A Berkhemer; Albert J Yoo; Hester F Lingsma; Cornelis H Slump; Yvo Bwem Roos; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Diederik Wj Dippel; Aad van der Lugt; Wim H van Zwam; Henk A Marquering; Charles Blm Majoie Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-11-19 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Wolfgang G Kunz; Wieland H Sommer; Lukas Havla; Franziska Dorn; Felix G Meinel; Olaf Dietrich; Grete Buchholz; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Kolja M Thierfelder Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: M Meijs; S A H Pegge; K Murayama; H D Boogaarts; M Prokop; P W A Willems; R Manniesing; F J A Meijer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2019-08-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Marcel T H Oei; Frederick J A Meijer; Willem-Jan van der Woude; Ewoud J Smit; Bram van Ginneken; Mathias Prokop; Rashindra Manniesing Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marcel T H Oei; Frederick J A Meijer; Willem-Jan van der Woude; Ewoud J Smit; Bram van Ginneken; Rashindra Manniesing; Mathias Prokop Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Jan W Dankbaar; Kelly G P Kerckhoffs; Alexander D Horsch; Irene C van der Schaaf; L Jaap Kappelle; Birgitta K Velthuis Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.649
Authors: Michał Gębka; Anna Bajer-Czajkowska; Sandra Pyza; Krzysztof Safranow; Wojciech Poncyljusz; Marcin Sawicki Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2022-01-16 Impact factor: 4.241