OBJECTIVES: In acute stroke patients with large vessel occlusion, collateral blood flow affects tissue fate and patient outcome. The visibility of collaterals on computed tomography angiography (CTA) strongly depends on the acquisition phase, but the optimal time point for collateral imaging is unknown. METHODS: We analysed collaterals in a time-resolved fashion using four-dimensional (4D) CTA in 82 endovascularly treated stroke patients, aiming to determine which acquisition phase best depicts collaterals and predicts outcome. Early, peak and late phases as well as temporally fused maximum intensity projections (tMIP) were graded using a semiquantitative regional leptomeningeal collateral score, compared with conventional single-phase CTA and correlated with functional outcome. RESULTS: The total extent of collateral flow was best visualised on tMIP. Collateral scores were significantly lower on early and peak phase as well as on single-phase CTA. Collateral grade was associated with favourable functional outcome and the strength of this relationship increased from earlier to later phases, with collaterals on tMIP showing the strongest correlation with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Temporally fused tMIP images provide the best depiction of collateral flow. Our findings suggest that the total extent of collateral flow, rather than the velocity of collateral filling, best predicts clinical outcome. KEY POINTS: • Collateral flow visibility on CTA strongly depends on the acquisition phase • tMIP offers the best visualisation of the extent of collaterals • Outcome prediction may be better with tMIP than with earlier phases.• Total extent of collaterals seems more important than their filling speed • If triggered too early, CTA may underestimate collateral flow.
OBJECTIVES: In acute strokepatients with large vessel occlusion, collateral blood flow affects tissue fate and patient outcome. The visibility of collaterals on computed tomography angiography (CTA) strongly depends on the acquisition phase, but the optimal time point for collateral imaging is unknown. METHODS: We analysed collaterals in a time-resolved fashion using four-dimensional (4D) CTA in 82 endovascularly treated strokepatients, aiming to determine which acquisition phase best depicts collaterals and predicts outcome. Early, peak and late phases as well as temporally fused maximum intensity projections (tMIP) were graded using a semiquantitative regional leptomeningeal collateral score, compared with conventional single-phase CTA and correlated with functional outcome. RESULTS: The total extent of collateral flow was best visualised on tMIP. Collateral scores were significantly lower on early and peak phase as well as on single-phase CTA. Collateral grade was associated with favourable functional outcome and the strength of this relationship increased from earlier to later phases, with collaterals on tMIP showing the strongest correlation with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Temporally fused tMIP images provide the best depiction of collateral flow. Our findings suggest that the total extent of collateral flow, rather than the velocity of collateral filling, best predicts clinical outcome. KEY POINTS: • Collateral flow visibility on CTA strongly depends on the acquisition phase • tMIP offers the best visualisation of the extent of collaterals • Outcome prediction may be better with tMIP than with earlier phases.• Total extent of collaterals seems more important than their filling speed • If triggered too early, CTA may underestimate collateral flow.
Authors: Oh Young Bang; Jeffrey L Saver; Suk Jae Kim; Gyeong-Moon Kim; Chin-Sang Chung; Bruce Ovbiagele; Kwang Ho Lee; David S Liebeskind Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Benjamin Pulli; Pamela W Schaefer; Reza Hakimelahi; Zeshan A Chaudhry; Michael H Lev; Joshua A Hirsch; R Gilberto González; Albert J Yoo Journal: Radiology Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: A M J Frölich; D Schrader; E Klotz; R Schramm; K Wasser; M Knauth; P Schramm Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mark W Parsons; Elizabeth M Pepper; Virgil Chan; Sabbir Siddique; Siva Rajaratnam; Grant A Bateman; Christopher R Levi Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Fabricio O Lima; Karen L Furie; Gisele S Silva; Michael H Lev; Erica C S Camargo; Aneesh B Singhal; Gordon J Harris; Elkan F Halpern; Walter J Koroshetz; Wade S Smith; Albert J Yoo; Raul G Nogueira Journal: Stroke Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Matthew B Maas; Michael H Lev; Hakan Ay; Aneesh B Singhal; David M Greer; Wade S Smith; Gordon J Harris; Elkan Halpern; André Kemmling; Walter J Koroshetz; Karen L Furie Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-07-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: I Y L Tan; A M Demchuk; J Hopyan; L Zhang; D Gladstone; K Wong; M Martin; S P Symons; A J Fox; R I Aviv Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Marios-Nikos Psychogios; Peter Schramm; Andreas Maximilian Frölich; Kai Kallenberg; Katrin Wasser; Lars Reinhardt; Andreas S Kreusch; Klaus Jung; Michael Knauth Journal: Stroke Date: 2013-05-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: K M Thierfelder; W H Sommer; B Ertl-Wagner; S E Beyer; F G Meinel; W G Kunz; G Buchholz; M F Reiser; H Janssen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S Lang; P Gölitz; T Struffert; J Rösch; K Rössler; M Kowarschik; C Strother; A Doerfler Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2017-04-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S E Beyer; K M Thierfelder; L von Baumgarten; M Rottenkolber; F G Meinel; H Janssen; B Ertl-Wagner; M F Reiser; W H Sommer Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Charlie Chia-Tsong Hsu; Gigi Nga Chi Kwan; Sachintha Hapugoda; Michelle Craigie; Trevor William Watkins; E Mark Haacke Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2017-01-01
Authors: Anna Mm Boers; Ivo Gh Jansen; Olvert A Berkhemer; Albert J Yoo; Hester F Lingsma; Cornelis H Slump; Yvo Bwem Roos; Robert J van Oostenbrugge; Diederik Wj Dippel; Aad van der Lugt; Wim H van Zwam; Henk A Marquering; Charles Blm Majoie Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2016-11-19 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Wolfgang G Kunz; Wieland H Sommer; Lukas Havla; Franziska Dorn; Felix G Meinel; Olaf Dietrich; Grete Buchholz; Birgit Ertl-Wagner; Kolja M Thierfelder Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-10-08 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: T Struffert; Y Deuerling-Zheng; S Kloska; T Engelhorn; S Lang; A Mennecke; M Manhart; C M Strother; S Schwab; A Doerfler Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-06-11 Impact factor: 3.825