BACKGROUND: We launched the Boston University Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) to assess the feasibility of carrying out an Internet-based preconception cohort study in the US and Canada. METHODS: We recruited female participants age 21-45 and their male partners through Internet advertisements, word of mouth, and flyers. Female participants were randomised with 50% probability to receive a subscription to FertilityFriend.com (FF), a web-based programme that collects real-time data on menstrual characteristics. We compared recruitment methods within PRESTO, assessed the cost-efficiency of PRESTO relative to its Danish counterpart (Snart-Gravid), and validated retrospectively reported date of last menstrual period (LMP) against the FF data. RESULTS:After 99 weeks of recruitment (2013-15), 2421 women enrolled; 1384 (57%) invited their male partners to participate, of whom 693 (50%) enrolled. Baseline characteristics were balanced across randomisation groups. Cohort retention was similar among those randomised vs. not randomised to FF (84% vs. 81%). At study enrollment, 56%, 22%, and 22% couples had been trying to conceive for < 3, 3-5, and ≥ 6 months, respectively. The cost per subject enrolled was $146 (2013 US$), which was similar to our companion Danish study and half that of a traditional cohort study. Among FF users who conceived, > 97% reported their LMP on the PRESTO questionnaire within 1 day of the LMP recorded via FF. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Internet as a method of recruitment and follow-up in a North American preconception cohort study was feasible and cost-effective.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: We launched the Boston University Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) to assess the feasibility of carrying out an Internet-based preconception cohort study in the US and Canada. METHODS: We recruited female participants age 21-45 and their male partners through Internet advertisements, word of mouth, and flyers. Female participants were randomised with 50% probability to receive a subscription to FertilityFriend.com (FF), a web-based programme that collects real-time data on menstrual characteristics. We compared recruitment methods within PRESTO, assessed the cost-efficiency of PRESTO relative to its Danish counterpart (Snart-Gravid), and validated retrospectively reported date of last menstrual period (LMP) against the FF data. RESULTS: After 99 weeks of recruitment (2013-15), 2421 women enrolled; 1384 (57%) invited their male partners to participate, of whom 693 (50%) enrolled. Baseline characteristics were balanced across randomisation groups. Cohort retention was similar among those randomised vs. not randomised to FF (84% vs. 81%). At study enrollment, 56%, 22%, and 22% couples had been trying to conceive for < 3, 3-5, and ≥ 6 months, respectively. The cost per subject enrolled was $146 (2013 US$), which was similar to our companion Danish study and half that of a traditional cohort study. Among FF users who conceived, > 97% reported their LMP on the PRESTO questionnaire within 1 day of the LMP recorded via FF. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Internet as a method of recruitment and follow-up in a North American preconception cohort study was feasible and cost-effective.
Authors: Andrew F Olshan; Sally D Perreault; Lorrie Bradley; Rebecca M Buus; Lillian F Strader; Susan C Jeffay; Lyle Lansdell; David A Savitz; Amy Herring Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2006-11-29 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Michael Joffe; Jane Key; Nicky Best; Niels Keiding; Thomas Scheike; Tina Kold Jensen Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2005-06-22 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Germaine M Buck; Courtney D Lynch; Joseph B Stanford; Anne M Sweeney; Laura A Schieve; John C Rockett; Sherry G Selevan; Steven M Schrader Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Ann Aschengrau; Lauren A Wise Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Kristen A Hahn; Amelia K Wesselink; Lauren A Wise; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Heidi T Cueto; Katherine L Tucker; Marco Vinceti; Kenneth J Rothman; Henrik Toft Sorensen; Elizabeth E Hatch Journal: J Nutr Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Melissa M Smarr; Katherine L Grantz; Rajeshwari Sundaram; José M Maisog; Masato Honda; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Germaine M Buck Louis Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Jennifer L Weuve; Ann Aschengrau; Rebecca J Song; Lauren A Wise Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Lauren A Wise; Elizabeth E Hatch; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Henrik T Sørensen; Anders H Riis; Craig J McKinnon; Kenneth J Rothman Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-03-27 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Kenneth J Rothman; Elizabeth E Hatch; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Henrik T Sørensen; Lauren A Wise Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Amelia K Wesselink; Lauren A Wise; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Joseph B Stanford; Craig J McKinnon; Shruthi Mahalingaiah Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2016-05-31 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Joseph B Stanford; Sydney K Willis; Elizabeth E Hatch; Kenneth J Rothman; Lauren A Wise Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2020-10-01 Impact factor: 6.918