Literature DB >> 28917614

Age and fecundability in a North American preconception cohort study.

Amelia K Wesselink1, Kenneth J Rothman2, Elizabeth E Hatch3, Ellen M Mikkelsen4, Henrik T Sørensen4, Lauren A Wise3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a well-documented decline in fertility treatment success with increasing female age; however, there are few preconception cohort studies that have examined female age and natural fertility. In addition, data on male age and fertility are inconsistent. Given the increasing number of couples who are attempting conception at older ages, a more detailed characterization of age-related fecundability in the general population is of great clinical utility.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between female and male age with fecundability. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a web-based preconception cohort study of pregnancy planners from the United States and Canada. Participants were enrolled between June 2013 and July 2017. Eligible participants were 21-45 years old (female) or ≥21 years old (male) and had not been using fertility treatments. Couples were followed until pregnancy or for up to 12 menstrual cycles. We analyzed data from 2962 couples who had been trying to conceive for ≤3 cycles at study entry and reported no history of infertility. We used life-table methods to estimate the unadjusted cumulative pregnancy proportion at 6 and 12 cycles by female and male age. We used proportional probabilities regression models to estimate fecundability ratios, the per-cycle probability of conception for each age category relative to the referent (21-24 years old), and 95% confidence intervals.
RESULTS: Among female patients, the unadjusted cumulative pregnancy proportion at 6 cycles of attempt time ranged from 62.0% (age 28-30 years) to 27.6% (age 40-45 years); the cumulative pregnancy proportion at 12 cycles of attempt time ranged from 79.3% (age 25-27 years old) to 55.5% (age 40-45 years old). Similar patterns were observed among male patients, although differences between age groups were smaller. After adjusting for potential confounders, we observed a nearly monotonic decline in fecundability with increasing female age, with the exception of 28-33 years, at which point fecundability was relatively stable. Fecundability ratios were 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.74-1.11) for ages 25-27, 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.08) for ages 28-30, 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.70-1.08) for ages 31-33, 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.05) for ages 34-36, 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.81) for ages 37-39, and 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.22-0.73) for ages 40-45, compared with the reference group (age, 21-24 years). The association was stronger among nulligravid women. Male age was not associated appreciably with fecundability after adjustment for female age, although the number of men >45 years old was small (n=37).
CONCLUSION: In this preconception cohort study of North American pregnancy planners, increasing female age was associated with an approximately linear decline in fecundability. Although we found little association between male age and fecundability, the small number of men in our study >45 years old limited our ability to draw conclusions on fecundability in older men.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  age; fecundability; fertility; preconception cohort

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28917614      PMCID: PMC5712257          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  34 in total

1.  Flexible regression models with cubic splines.

Authors:  S Durrleman; R Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Does low participation in cohort studies induce bias?

Authors:  Ellen Aagaard Nohr; Morten Frydenberg; Tine Brink Henriksen; Jorn Olsen
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  First Births in America. Changes in the Timing of Parenthood. Ronald B. Rindfuss, S. Philip Morgan, and Gray Swicegood. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1988. xii, 291 pp., illus. $35. Studies in Demography.

Authors:  D P Hogan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-10-14       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Commentary: time-to-pregnancy in the Real World.

Authors:  Niels Keiding; Rémy Slama
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Increasing paternal age is associated with delayed conception in a large population of fertile couples: evidence for declining fecundity in older men. The ALSPAC Study Team (Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood).

Authors:  W C Ford; K North; H Taylor; A Farrow; M G Hull; J Golding
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  Consistent age-dependent declines in human semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sheri L Johnson; Jessica Dunleavy; Neil J Gemmell; Shinichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 10.895

7.  Impact of female age and nulligravidity on fecundity in an older reproductive age cohort.

Authors:  Anne Z Steiner; Anne Marie Z Jukic
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life.

Authors:  T J Matthews; Brady E Hamilton
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2009-08

9.  Accuracy loss due to selection bias in cohort studies with left truncation.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Aijun Ye; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.980

10.  Intended and unintended births in the United States: 1982-2010.

Authors:  William D Mosher; Jo Jones; Joyce C Abma
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2012-07-24
View more
  25 in total

1.  A prospective study of influenza vaccination and time to pregnancy.

Authors:  Olivia R Orta; Elizabeth E Hatch; Annette K Regan; Rebecca Perkins; Amelia K Wesselink; Sydney K Willis; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Kenneth J Rothman; Lauren A Wise
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Cumulative probabilities of live birth across multiple complete IVF/ICSI cycles: a call for attention.

Authors:  Juan J Tarín; Eva Pascual; Santiago Pérez-Hoyos; Raúl Gómez; Miguel A García-Pérez; Antonio Cano
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Decreased clinical pregnancy and live birth rates after short interval from delivery to subsequent assisted reproductive treatment cycle.

Authors:  Molly M Quinn; Mitchell P Rosen; Isabel Elaine Allen; Heather G Huddleston; Marcelle I Cedars; Victor Y Fujimoto
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Predictive models of pregnancy based on data from a preconception cohort study.

Authors:  Jennifer J Yland; Taiyao Wang; Zahra Zad; Sydney K Willis; Tanran R Wang; Amelia K Wesselink; Tammy Jiang; Elizabeth E Hatch; Lauren A Wise; Ioannis Ch Paschalidis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Neuro-obstetrics: A multidisciplinary approach to care of women with neurologic disease.

Authors:  Ingrid A Brussé; Anna C M Kluivers; Maria D Zambrano; Kara Shetler; Eliza C Miller
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2020

6.  Associations Between Perceived Susceptibility to Pregnancy and Contraceptive Use in a National Sample of Women Veterans.

Authors:  Laura E Britton; Colleen P Judge-Golden; Tierney E Wolgemuth; Xinhua Zhao; Maria K Mor; Lisa S Callegari; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2019-11-20

7.  Menstrual patterns and self-reported hirsutism as assessed via the modified Ferriman-Gallwey scale: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sydney K Willis; Hannah M Mathew; Lauren A Wise; Elizabeth E Hatch; Amelia K Wesselink; Kenneth J Rothman; Shruthi Mahalingaiah
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2020-03-06       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  A prospective study of treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and fecundability.

Authors:  Lauren A Wise; Sydney K Willis; Rebecca B Perkins; Amelia K Wesselink; Alexandra Klann; Holly M Crowe; Kristen A Hahn; Ellen M Mikkelsen; Elizabeth E Hatch
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-12-28       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Exposure to non-persistent chemicals in consumer products and fecundability: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alison E Hipwell; Linda G Kahn; Pam Factor-Litvak; Christina A Porucznik; Eva L Siegel; Raina N Fichorova; Richard F Hamman; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Kim G Harley
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Association between bacterial vaginosis and fecundability in Kenyan women planning pregnancies: a prospective preconception cohort study.

Authors:  Erica M Lokken; Lisa E Manhart; John Kinuthia; James P Hughes; Clayton Jisuvei; Khamis Mwinyikai; Charles H Muller; Kishor Mandaliya; Walter Jaoko; R Scott McClelland
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.