Joseph M Braun1, Carmen Messerlian2, Russ Hauser2,3. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, RI. 2. Department of Environmental Health, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite accumulating evidence from experimental animal studies showing that paternal environmental exposures induce genetic and epigenetic alterations in sperm which in turn increase the risk of adverse health outcomes in offspring, there is limited epidemiological data on the effects of human paternal preconception exposures on children's health. We summarize animal and human studies showing that paternal preconception environmental exposures influence offspring health. We discuss specific approaches and designs for human studies to investigate the health effects of paternal preconception exposures, the specific challenges these studies may face, and how we might address them. RECENT FINDINGS: In animal studies, paternal preconception diet, stress, and chemical exposures have been associated with offspring health and these effects are mediated by epigenetic modifications transmitted through sperm DNA, histones, and RNA. Most epidemiological studies have examined paternal preconception occupational exposures and their effect on the risk of birth defects and childhood cancer; few have examined the effects of low-level general population exposure to environmental toxicants. While the design and execution of epidemiological studies of paternal preconception exposures face challenges, particularly with regard to selection bias and recruitment, we believe these are tractable and that preconception studies are feasible. SUMMARY: New or augmented prospective cohort studies would be the optimal method to address the critical knowledge gaps on the effect of paternal preconception exposures on prevalent childhood health outcomes. Determining if this period of life represents a window of heightened vulnerability would improve our understanding of modifiable risk factors for children's health and wellbeing.
PURPOSE: Despite accumulating evidence from experimental animal studies showing that paternal environmental exposures induce genetic and epigenetic alterations in sperm which in turn increase the risk of adverse health outcomes in offspring, there is limited epidemiological data on the effects of human paternal preconception exposures on children's health. We summarize animal and human studies showing that paternal preconception environmental exposures influence offspring health. We discuss specific approaches and designs for human studies to investigate the health effects of paternal preconception exposures, the specific challenges these studies may face, and how we might address them. RECENT FINDINGS: In animal studies, paternal preconception diet, stress, and chemical exposures have been associated with offspring health and these effects are mediated by epigenetic modifications transmitted through sperm DNA, histones, and RNA. Most epidemiological studies have examined paternal preconception occupational exposures and their effect on the risk of birth defects and childhood cancer; few have examined the effects of low-level general population exposure to environmental toxicants. While the design and execution of epidemiological studies of paternal preconception exposures face challenges, particularly with regard to selection bias and recruitment, we believe these are tractable and that preconception studies are feasible. SUMMARY: New or augmented prospective cohort studies would be the optimal method to address the critical knowledge gaps on the effect of paternal preconception exposures on prevalent childhood health outcomes. Determining if this period of life represents a window of heightened vulnerability would improve our understanding of modifiable risk factors for children's health and wellbeing.
Entities:
Keywords:
Children’s health; chemical exposures; epidemiology; epigenetics; paternal; preconception; prenatal
Authors: Benjamin R Carone; Lucas Fauquier; Naomi Habib; Jeremy M Shea; Caroline E Hart; Ruowang Li; Christoph Bock; Chengjian Li; Hongcang Gu; Phillip D Zamore; Alexander Meissner; Zhiping Weng; Hans A Hofmann; Nir Friedman; Oliver J Rando Journal: Cell Date: 2010-12-23 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Lucy M Anderson; Lisa Riffle; Ralph Wilson; Gregory S Travlos; Mariusz S Lubomirski; W Gregory Alvord Journal: Nutrition Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Upasna Sharma; Colin C Conine; Jeremy M Shea; Ana Boskovic; Alan G Derr; Xin Y Bing; Clemence Belleannee; Alper Kucukural; Ryan W Serra; Fengyun Sun; Lina Song; Benjamin R Carone; Emiliano P Ricci; Xin Z Li; Lucas Fauquier; Melissa J Moore; Robert Sullivan; Craig C Mello; Manuel Garber; Oliver J Rando Journal: Science Date: 2015-12-31 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: María M Morales-Suárez-Varela; Gunnar V Toft; Morten S Jensen; Cecilia Ramlau-Hansen; Linda Kaerlev; Ane-Marie Thulstrup; Agustín Llopis-González; Jørn Olsen; Jens P Bonde Journal: Environ Health Date: 2011-01-14 Impact factor: 5.984
Authors: Carmen Messerlian; David Bellinger; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Megan E Romano; Jennifer B Ford; Paige L Williams; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Joseph M Braun Journal: Environ Res Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Vicente Mustieles; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; George Christou; Jennifer B Ford; Irene Dimitriadis; Russ Hauser; Irene Souter; Carmen Messerlian Journal: Environ Res Date: 2018-11-17 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Vicente Mustieles; Paige L Williams; Mariana F Fernandez; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jennifer B Ford; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Carmen Messerlian Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Vicente Mustieles; Yu Zhang; Jennifer Yland; Joseph M Braun; Paige L Williams; Blair J Wylie; Jill A Attaman; Jennifer B Ford; Alexandra Azevedo; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Carmen Messerlian Journal: Environ Int Date: 2020-02-29 Impact factor: 9.621