Asha Singanamalli1, Mirabela Rusu1, Rachel E Sparks2, Natalie N C Shih3, Amy Ziober3, Li-Ping Wang3, John Tomaszewski4, Mark Rosen5, Michael Feldman3, Anant Madabhushi1. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 2. Centre for Medical Image Computing, University College of London, London, United Kingdom. 3. Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Department of Pathology & Anatomical Sciences, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA. 5. Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To identify computer extracted in vivo dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI markers associated with quantitative histomorphometric (QH) characteristics of microvessels and Gleason scores (GS) in prostate cancer. METHODS: This study considered retrospective data from 23 biopsy confirmed prostate cancer patients who underwent 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI before radical prostatectomy (RP). Representative slices from RP specimens were stained with vascular marker CD31. Tumor extent was mapped from RP sections onto DCE MRI using nonlinear registration methods. Seventy-seven microvessel QH features and 18 DCE MRI kinetic features were extracted and evaluated for their ability to distinguish low from intermediate and high GS. The effect of temporal sampling on kinetic features was assessed and correlations between those robust to temporal resolution and microvessel features discriminative of GS were examined. RESULTS: A total of 12 microvessel architectural features were discriminative of low and intermediate/high grade tumors with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) > 0.7. These features were most highly correlated with mean washout gradient (WG) (max rho = -0.62). Independent analysis revealed WG to be moderately robust to temporal resolution (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.63) and WG variance, which was poorly correlated with microvessel features, to be predictive of low grade tumors (AUC = 0.77). Enhancement ratio was the most robust (ICC = 0.96) and discriminative (AUC = 0.78) kinetic feature but was moderately correlated with microvessel features (max rho = -0.52). CONCLUSION: Computer extracted features of prostate DCE MRI appear to be correlated with microvessel architecture and may be discriminative of low versus intermediate and high GS.
BACKGROUND: To identify computer extracted in vivo dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI markers associated with quantitative histomorphometric (QH) characteristics of microvessels and Gleason scores (GS) in prostate cancer. METHODS: This study considered retrospective data from 23 biopsy confirmed prostate cancerpatients who underwent 3 Tesla multiparametric MRI before radical prostatectomy (RP). Representative slices from RP specimens were stained with vascular marker CD31. Tumor extent was mapped from RP sections onto DCE MRI using nonlinear registration methods. Seventy-seven microvessel QH features and 18 DCE MRI kinetic features were extracted and evaluated for their ability to distinguish low from intermediate and high GS. The effect of temporal sampling on kinetic features was assessed and correlations between those robust to temporal resolution and microvessel features discriminative of GS were examined. RESULTS: A total of 12 microvessel architectural features were discriminative of low and intermediate/high grade tumors with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) > 0.7. These features were most highly correlated with mean washout gradient (WG) (max rho = -0.62). Independent analysis revealed WG to be moderately robust to temporal resolution (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.63) and WG variance, which was poorly correlated with microvessel features, to be predictive of low grade tumors (AUC = 0.77). Enhancement ratio was the most robust (ICC = 0.96) and discriminative (AUC = 0.78) kinetic feature but was moderately correlated with microvessel features (max rho = -0.52). CONCLUSION: Computer extracted features of prostate DCE MRI appear to be correlated with microvessel architecture and may be discriminative of low versus intermediate and high GS.
Authors: Andrew Janowczyk; Sharat Chandran; Rajendra Singh; Dimitra Sasaroli; George Coukos; Michael D Feldman; Anant Madabhushi Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2011-12-13 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Jüri R Palisaar; Joachim Noldus; Björn Löppenberg; Christian von Bodman; Florian Sommerer; Thilo Eggert Journal: BJU Int Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Ian Thompson; James Brantley Thrasher; Gunnar Aus; Arthur L Burnett; Edith D Canby-Hagino; Michael S Cookson; Anthony V D'Amico; Roger R Dmochowski; David T Eton; Jeffrey D Forman; S Larry Goldenberg; Javier Hernandez; Celestia S Higano; Stephen R Kraus; Judd W Moul; Catherine M Tangen Journal: J Urol Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Andreas Erbersdobler; Hendrik Isbarn; Kira Dix; Isabel Steiner; Thorsten Schlomm; Martina Mirlacher; Guido Sauter; Alexander Haese Journal: World J Urol Date: 2009-08-28 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Jennifer R Stark; Sven Perner; Meir J Stampfer; Jennifer A Sinnott; Stephen Finn; Anna S Eisenstein; Jing Ma; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Tobias Kurth; Massimo Loda; Edward L Giovannucci; Mark A Rubin; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Scott Doyle; Michael D Feldman; Natalie Shih; John Tomaszewski; Anant Madabhushi Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2012-10-30 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Anne L Martel; Dan Hosseinzadeh; Caglar Senaras; Yu Zhou; Azadeh Yazdanpanah; Rushin Shojaii; Emily S Patterson; Anant Madabhushi; Metin N Gurcan Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Shoshana B Ginsburg; Ahmad Algohary; Shivani Pahwa; Vikas Gulani; Lee Ponsky; Hannu J Aronen; Peter J Boström; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; James Thompson; Marley Pulbrock; Pekka Taimen; Robert Villani; Phillip Stricker; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Ivan Jambor; Anant Madabhushi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jacob Antunes; Satish Viswanath; Justin T Brady; Benjamin Crawshaw; Pablo Ros; Scott Steele; Conor P Delaney; Raj Paspulati; Joseph Willis; Anant Madabhushi Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2018-01-19 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Mirabela Rusu; Wei Shao; Christian A Kunder; Jeffrey B Wang; Simon J C Soerensen; Nikola C Teslovich; Rewa R Sood; Leo C Chen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; James D Brooks; Geoffrey A Sonn Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-07-18 Impact factor: 4.071