Literature DB >> 34075559

Bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging based radiomics for the identification of benign and malignant prostate lesions: cross-vendor validation.

Xuefu Ji1,2, Jiayi Zhang2, Yuguo Tang3, Wei Xia4, Wei Shi2, Dong He5, Jie Bao6, Xuedong Wei5, Yuhua Huang5, Yangchuan Liu2, Jyh-Cheng Chen7,8, Xin Gao2.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop Bi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (BP-MRI) based radiomics models for differentiation between benign and malignant prostate lesions, and to cross-vendor validate the generalization ability of the models. The prebiopsy BP-MRI data (T2-Weighted Image [T2WI] and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient [ADC]) of 459 patients with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer were acquired using two scanners from different vendors. The prostate biopsies are the reference standard for diagnosing benign and malignant prostate lesions. The training set was 168 patients' data from Siemens (Vendor 1), and the inner test set was 70 patients' data from the same vendor. The external test set was 221 patients' data from GE (Vendor 2). The lesion Region of Interest (ROI) was manually delineated by experienced radiologists. A total of 851 radiomics features including shape, first-order statistical, texture, and wavelet features were extracted from ROI in T2WI and ADC, respectively. Two feature-ranking methods (Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance [MRMR] and Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test [WRST]) and three classifiers (Random Forest [RF], Support Vector Machine [SVM], and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator [LASSO] regression) were investigated for their efficacy in building single-parametric radiomics signatures. A biparametric radiomics model was built by combining the optimal single-parametric radiomics signatures. A comprehensive diagnosis model was built by combining the biparametric radiomics model with age and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) value using multivariable logistic regression. All models were built in the training set and independently validated in the inner and external test sets, and the performances of models in the diagnosis of benign and malignant prostate lesions were quantified by the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). The mean AUCs of the inner and external test sets were calculated for each model. The non-inferiority test was used to test if the AUC of model in external test was not inferior to the AUC of model in inner test. Combining MRMR and LASSO produced the best-performing single-parametric radiomics signatures with the highest mean AUC of 0.673 for T2WI (inner test AUC = 0.729 vs. external test AUC = 0.616, p = 0.569) and the highest mean AUC of 0.810 for ADC (inner test AUC = 0.822 vs. external test AUC = 0.797, p = 0.102). The biparametric radiomics model produced a mean AUC of 0.833 (inner test AUC = 0.867 vs. external test AUC = 0.798, p = 0.051). The comprehensive diagnosis model had an improved mean AUC of 0.911 (inner test AUC = 0.935 vs. external test AUC = 0.886, p = 0.010). The comprehensive diagnosis model for differentiating benign from malignant prostate lesions was accurate and generalizable.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging; Diagnosis; Prostate cancer; Radiomics

Year:  2021        PMID: 34075559     DOI: 10.1007/s13246-021-01022-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 2662-4729


  36 in total

1.  Prostatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an aggressive tumour variant unrecognized on T2 weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Authors:  Nicola Schieda; Niamh Coffey; Previn Gulavita; Omran Al-Dandan; Wael Shabana; Trevor A Flood
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Detection of Individual Prostate Cancer Foci via Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  David C Johnson; Steven S Raman; Sohrab A Mirak; Lorna Kwan; Amirhossein M Bajgiran; William Hsu; Cleo K Maehara; Preeti Ahuja; Izak Faiena; Aydin Pooli; Amirali Salmasi; Anthony Sisk; Ely R Felker; David S K Lu; Robert E Reiter
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 3.  Diffusion-weighted MRI and its role in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Teruki Sone; Yoshimasa Jo; Akira Yamamoto; Katsuyoshi Ito
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Patrick J Bastian; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Theodor van der Kwast; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Thomas Wiegel; F Zattoni; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 2.2016.

Authors:  Peter R Carroll; J Kellogg Parsons; Gerald Andriole; Robert R Bahnson; Erik P Castle; William J Catalona; Douglas M Dahl; John W Davis; Jonathan I Epstein; Ruth B Etzioni; Thomas Farrington; George P Hemstreet; Mark H Kawachi; Simon Kim; Paul H Lange; Kevin R Loughlin; William Lowrance; Paul Maroni; James Mohler; Todd M Morgan; Kelvin A Moses; Robert B Nadler; Michael Poch; Chuck Scales; Terrence M Shaneyfelt; Marc C Smaldone; Geoffrey Sonn; Preston Sprenkle; Andrew J Vickers; Robert Wake; Dorothy A Shead; Deborah A Freedman-Cass
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Using biparametric MRI radiomics signature to differentiate between benign and malignant prostate lesions.

Authors:  Min Xu; Mengjie Fang; Jian Zou; Shudong Yang; Dongdong Yu; Lianzhen Zhong; Chaoen Hu; Yali Zang; Di Dong; Jie Tian; Xiangming Fang
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 7.  Prostate cancer: AR aberrations and resistance to abiraterone or enzalutamide.

Authors:  Gerhardt Attard; Emmanuel S Antonarakis
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 14.432

8.  Prospective evaluation of an extended 21-core biopsy scheme as initial prostate cancer diagnostic strategy.

Authors:  Guillaume Ploussard; Nathalie Nicolaiew; Charles Marchand; Stéphane Terry; Francis Vacherot; Dimitri Vordos; Yves Allory; Claude-Clément Abbou; Laurent Salomon; Alexandre de la Taille
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of tobacco use and prostate cancer mortality and incidence in prospective cohort studies.

Authors:  Farhad Islami; Daniel M Moreira; Paolo Boffetta; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-18       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 10.  Detection of prostate cancer and predicting progression: current and future diagnostic markers.

Authors:  James V Tricoli; Mason Schoenfeldt; Barbara A Conley
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  2 in total

1.  MRI Based Radiomics Compared With the PI-RADS V2.1 in the Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Biparametric vs Multiparametric MRI.

Authors:  Tong Chen; Zhiyuan Zhang; Shuangxiu Tan; Yueyue Zhang; Chaogang Wei; Shan Wang; Wenlu Zhao; Xusheng Qian; Zhiyong Zhou; Junkang Shen; Yakang Dai; Jisu Hu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 2.  Radiomics in prostate cancer: an up-to-date review.

Authors:  Matteo Ferro; Ottavio de Cobelli; Gennaro Musi; Francesco Del Giudice; Giuseppe Carrieri; Gian Maria Busetto; Ugo Giovanni Falagario; Alessandro Sciarra; Martina Maggi; Felice Crocetto; Biagio Barone; Vincenzo Francesco Caputo; Michele Marchioni; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Ciro Imbimbo; Francesco Alessandro Mistretta; Stefano Luzzago; Mihai Dorin Vartolomei; Luigi Cormio; Riccardo Autorino; Octavian Sabin Tătaru
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-07-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.