Literature DB >> 26104218

Species sensitivity analysis of heavy metals to freshwater organisms.

Zheng Xin1, Zang Wenchao2, Yan Zhenguang3, Hong Yiguo4, Liu Zhengtao1, Yi Xianliang5, Wang Xiaonan1, Liu Tingting1, Zhou Liming6.   

Abstract

Acute toxicity data of six heavy metals [Cu, Hg, Cd, Cr(VI), Pb, Zn] to aquatic organisms were collected and screened. Species sensitivity distributions (SSD) curves of vertebrate and invertebrate were constructed by log-logistic model separately. The comprehensive comparisons of the sensitivities of different trophic species to six typical heavy metals were performed. The results indicated invertebrate taxa to each heavy metal exhibited higher sensitivity than vertebrates. However, with respect to the same taxa species, Cu had the most adverse effect on vertebrate, followed by Hg, Cd, Zn and Cr. When datasets from all species were included, Cu and Hg were still more toxic than the others. In particular, the toxicities of Pb to vertebrate and fish were complicated as the SSD curves of Pb intersected with those of other heavy metals, while the SSD curves of Pb constructed by total species no longer crossed with others. The hazardous concentrations for 5 % of the species (HC5) affected were derived to determine the concentration protecting 95 % of species. The HC5 values of the six heavy metals were in the descending order: Zn > Pb > Cr > Cd > Hg > Cu, indicating toxicities in opposite order. Moreover, potential affected fractions were calculated to assess the ecological risks of different heavy metals at certain concentrations of the selected heavy metals. Evaluations of sensitivities of the species at various trophic levels and toxicity analysis of heavy metals are necessary prior to derivation of water quality criteria and the further environmental protection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aquatic organisms; Ecological risks; Heavy metals; Species sensitivity distributions (SSD); Toxicity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26104218     DOI: 10.1007/s10646-015-1500-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecotoxicology        ISSN: 0963-9292            Impact factor:   2.823


  26 in total

Review 1.  Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; J S Jaworska
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 6.291

2.  Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice.

Authors:  J R Wheeler; E P M Grist; K M Y Leung; D Morritt; M Crane
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data.

Authors:  G C Hose; P J Van den Brink
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Insecticide species sensitivity distributions: importance of test species selection and relevance to aquatic ecosystems.

Authors:  Lorraine Maltby; Naomi Blake; Theo C M Brock; Paul J van den Brink
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.742

5.  Ecological risk of heavy metals in sediments of the Luan River source water.

Authors:  Jingling Liu; Yongli Li; Bao Zhang; Jinling Cao; Zhiguo Cao; Joseph Domagalski
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Development of species sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC(5) of organochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Gang Yu; Jun Huang; Hongying Hu
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data.

Authors:  T Aldenberg; W Slob
Journal:  Ecotoxicol Environ Saf       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.291

8.  Donor brain death reduces survival after transplantation in rat livers preserved for 20 hr.

Authors:  J A Van der Hoeven; S Lindell; R van Schilfgaarde; G Molema; G J Ter Horst; J H Southard; R J Ploeg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Mercury concentrations in tropical resident and migrant songbirds on Hispaniola.

Authors:  Jason M Townsend; Christopher C Rimmer; Charles T Driscoll; Kent P McFarland; Eduardo Iñigo-Elias
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 2.823

10.  Relative sensitivity distribution of aquatic invertebrates to organic and metal compounds.

Authors:  Peter Carsten von der Ohe; Matthias Liess
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.742

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of metal and predator stressors in larval southern toads (Anaxyrus terrestris).

Authors:  Caitlin T Rumrill; David E Scott; Stacey L Lance
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Lower tier toxicity risk assessment of agriculture pesticides detected on the Río Madre de Dios watershed, Costa Rica.

Authors:  M Arias-Andrés; R Rämö; F Mena Torres; R Ugalde; L Grandas; C Ruepert; L E Castillo; P J Van den Brink; J S Gunnarsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Phenol-rich fulvic acid as a water additive enhances growth, reduces stress, and stimulates the immune system of fish in aquaculture.

Authors:  Thora Lieke; Christian E W Steinberg; Bo Pan; Irina V Perminova; Thomas Meinelt; Klaus Knopf; Werner Kloas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Deriving Soil Quality Criteria of Chromium Based on Species Sensitivity Distribution Methodology.

Authors:  Yuxia Liu; Qixing Zhou; Yi Wang; Siwen Cheng; Weiduo Hao
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2021-03-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.