Literature DB >> 26101771

In Vitro Properties of Potential Probiotic Indigenous Lactic Acid Bacteria Originating from Traditional Pickles.

Mehmet Tokatlı1, Gökşen Gülgör2, Simel Bağder Elmacı3, Nurdan Arslankoz İşleyen4, Filiz Özçelik3.   

Abstract

The suitable properties of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains (preselected among 153 strains on the basis of their potential technological properties) isolated from traditional Çubuk pickles were examined in vitro. For this purpose, these strains (21 Lactobacillus plantarum, 11 Pediococcus ethanolidurans, and 7 Lactobacillus brevis) were tested for the ability to survive at pH 2.5, resistance to bile salts, viability in the presence of pepsin-pancreatin, ability to deconjugate bile salts, cholesterol assimilation, and surface hydrophobicity properties. Most of the properties tested could be assumed to be strain-dependent. However, L. plantarum and L. brevis species were found to possess desirable probiotic properties to a greater extent compared to P. ethanolidurans. In contrast to P. ethanolidurans strains, the tested L. plantarum and L. brevis strains exhibited bile salt tolerance, albeit to different extent. All tested strains showed less resistance to intestinal conditions than gastric juice environment. Based on the survival under gastrointestinal conditions, 22 of the 39 strains were selected for further characterization. The eight strains having the highest cholesterol assimilation and surface hydrophobicity ratios could be taken as promising probiotic candidates for further in vivo studies, because of the strongest variations found among the tested strains with regard to these properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26101771      PMCID: PMC4460932          DOI: 10.1155/2015/315819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Res Int            Impact factor:   3.411


1. Introduction

There has been an increasing interest in functional foods with health-promoting attributes. Within this context, probiotic foods have received considerable attention in recent years [1]. Probiotics are defined as “live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host” [2], as updated by Hill et al. [3]. The beneficial health effects claimed for probiotics are regulation of microbial balance in the gastrointestinal tract, reduction of serum cholesterol levels, alleviation of lactose intolerance symptoms, lowering the risk of colon cancer, enhancement of nutrients bioavailability, prevention or reduction of the prevalence of allergies in susceptible individuals, enhancement of the immune system, and improvement of calcium absorption [1, 4–6]. As established by the Food and Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization (FAO/WHO), the main currently used in vitro tests for the study of probiotic strains are resistance to gastric acidity, bile acid resistance, adherence to mucus and/or human epithelial cells and cell lines, antimicrobial activity against potentially pathogenic bacteria, ability to reduce pathogen adhesion to surfaces, and bile salt hydrolase activity [2]. The most commonly used probiotic microorganisms include various species of genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, as well as some Bacillus, Streptococcus, Pediococcus, and Enterococcus species [7, 8]. In the past, human/animal gastrointestinal tract was considered as the principal source of probiotic strains since those strains of host origin would be better adapted to colonize the human/animal gastrointestinal tract [9, 10]. Recently, fermented foods, in which probiotics are intended to be used, have drawn attention as source of probiotic organisms [9]. Dairy products have been considered as the best matrices to deliver probiotics [1, 11]. On the other hand, there is a growing interest in the development of non-dairy-based probiotic products due to the drawbacks related to the consumption of dairy products, including lactose intolerance and the unfavourable cholesterol content [4, 8]. Although the use of fermented fruit and vegetable products as raw material for probiotic microorganisms has started to be investigated in several studies [1, 4, 9], they are still scarce compared with dairy products. In this context, pickle which is a traditional fermented vegetable product could be a promising source of probiotic microorganisms. The aim of this work was to study some suitable properties of potential probiotic LAB associated with pickles. Thirty-nine LAB isolates originating from naturally fermented pickles were subjected to in vitro analyses to determine their probiotic potential. The properties tested in this study include ability to survive at pH 2.5, resistance to bile salts (0.3% oxgall), viability in the presence of pepsin-pancreatin, ability to deconjugate bile salts, cholesterol assimilation, and surface hydrophobicity properties.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

A total of 39 indigenous LAB strains, isolated from pickles produced in Ankara-Çubuk region, were screened for their potential probiotic properties. The tested strains (preselected among 153 LAB strains on the basis of their potential technological properties, including growth ability in MRS Broth, acid production, and tolerance to low pH) included 21 L. plantarum, 11 P. ethanolidurans, and 7 L. brevis strains which were previously identified by molecular methods. The GenBank accession numbers for the 16S rRNA gene sequences of the strains were reported previously [12]. The LAB strains were cultured at 30°C for 48 h in MRS Broth and/or MRS Agar as basal media.

2.2. Screening for Probiotic Properties

2.2.1. Resistance to Low pH, Bile Salts, and Simulated Gastric and Intestinal Fluids

To determine the acid tolerance of strains, LAB cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6000 g for 15 min after incubation at 30°C for 48 h. The collected pellets were suspended in sterile PBS (phosphate-saline buffer; 9 g/L NaCl, 9 g/L Na2HPO4·2H2O, 1.5 g/L KH2PO4) adjusted to pH 2.5 to the initial volume. The mixture was then incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Aliquots of samples were taken at time 0 and after 4 h. These samples were serially diluted in sterile saline solution (0.85% NaCl) and the viable cell population was determined by the spread plate method using MRS Agar. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 48 h [13]. The percentage survival of the bacteria was calculated as follows:For the bile salt tolerance assay, MRS Broth containing 0.3% (w/v) bile salt (oxgall) was inoculated with active LAB cultures (incubated at 30°C for 48 h) at an inoculum size of 1% (v/v) and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. The viable cell population was determined at 0 h and 4 h of incubation on MRS Agar plates by the spread plate method. The percentage survival of the bacteria was calculated according to (1) [14]. To test the viability in the presence of pepsin, simulated gastric juice which was prepared by suspending 3 mg/mL pepsin in sterile saline solution (0.85% NaCl, w/v) adjusted to pH 2.5 was inoculated with active LAB cultures (incubated at 30°C for 48 h) at an inoculum size of 1% (v/v) and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Simulated intestinal fluid which was prepared by dissolving bile salt (0.3%) and pancreatin (1 mg/mL) in sterile saline solution (0.85% NaCl, w/v) adjusted to pH 8.0 was used in pancreatin resistance test. This fluid was inoculated with active LAB cultures at an inoculum size of 1% (v/v) and incubated at 37°C for 6 h. The viable cell population was determined before and after incubation on MRS Agar plates by the spread plate method. The percentage survival of the bacteria was calculated according to (1) [7, 15].

2.2.2. Deconjugation of Bile Salts

Deconjugation of bile salt by LAB strains was tested through the plate assay as described by Ahn et al. [16]. 1 mM of sodium taurodeoxycholate hydrate (TDCA), taurocholic acid sodium salt hydrate (TCA), sodium taurolithocholate (TLCA), sodium glycocholate hydrate (GCA), and sodium taurochenodeoxycholate (TCDCA) were added either individually or as a mixture to MRS Agar to prepare Bile salt-MRS Agar plates. The plates were then inoculated with 10 μL of active LAB cultures and incubated at 37°C for 72 h. Subsequently, diameters of the precipitate halos around colonies were measured.

2.2.3. Cholesterol Assimilation

MRS Broth supplemented with 50 μg/mL water-soluble form of cholesterol (PEG600, Sigma) was inoculated with active LAB cultures at an inoculum size of 1% (v/v). After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, the culture cells were removed by centrifugation. The collected supernatant and the control, which was the uninoculated sterile broth, were then assayed for their cholesterol content by OPA (o-phthalaldehyde) method as described by Rudel and Morris [17] with slight modifications by Gilliland et al. [18]. Differences in the cholesterol content between the control and the culture test tubes were taken as the assimilated amount of cholesterol.

2.2.4. Surface Hydrophobicity

The adhesion ability of the organisms to hydrocarbons is used as a measure of their hydrophobicity. Briefly, LAB cells were harvested by centrifugation at 6000 g for 10 min, washed twice in 50 mM K2HPO4, and then resuspended in the same buffer to obtain an A 560 nm value of approximately 1.0. Three mL of bacterial suspension was put in contact with 0.6 mL of n-hexadecane by vortexing for 2 min. The phases were allowed to separate by decantation at 37°C for 1 h. The aqueous phase was carefully removed, and the A 560 was measured. The decrease in the absorbance of the aqueous phase was taken as a measure of the cell surface hydrophobicity (H%), which was calculated with the formula H% = [(A − A)/A ]∗100, where A and A are the absorbance before and after extraction with n-hexadecane [19].

2.2.5. Statistical Analyses

All experiments were conducted in two biological replicates, each with two technical replicates. Experimental data were analysed with one-way ANOVA using the Minitab statistical software, version 14 (Minitab Inc., State College, PA, USA). Statistical differences among means were determined by the Duncan's multiple range tests at the 5% significance level.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Resistance to Low pH, Bile Salts, and Simulated Gastric and Intestinal Fluids

Resistance to stomach pH, bile salts, and pancreatic fluid is of great importance in predicting the survival and growth of the potential probiotic strains in the gastrointestinal conditions [7, 15]. Tolerance to gastric acidity (pH 2.0–2.5) is considered as a key functional requirement for probiotics, which enables them to survive during passage through the gastrointestinal tract [20]. The viable counts of the 14 LAB strains were found to be below 1 log cfu/mL after 4 h of exposure to pH 2.5, and consequently these strains were not further tested. For the remaining 25 strains belonging to L. plantarum, L. brevis, and P. ethanolidurans, survival at pH 2.5 for 4 h was 35–85%, 33–64%, and 40–76%, respectively (Table 1). At the species level, the majority of L. plantarum and L. brevis strains showed higher resistance to low pH in comparison with P. ethanolidurans strains. The survival ability of lactobacilli at pH 2.5 was also reported by others [1, 21]. However, variability in acidic response was obtained among the tested strains (p < 0.05), indicating that resistance to low pH is a strain-specific property. Similarly, Jacobsen et al. [22] reported strain-dependent survival of Lactobacillus spp. isolated from Ghanaian fermented maize.
Table 1

Acid tolerance of LAB strains in PBS (pH 2.5).

SpeciesStrain numberInitial counts (log cfu/mL) Survival after 4 h at pH 2.5
(log cfu/mL)%
L. plantarum MF3039.47 ± 0.048.08 ± 0.1685A
MF1699.22 ± 0.057.05 ± 0.1776B
MF48.54 ± 0.076.14 ± 0.0772C
MF2139.45 ± 0.056.79 ± 0.1072C
MF1439.28 ± 0.016.49 ± 0.0170CD
MF5569.85 ± 0.006.60 ± 0.0067DE
MF3769.94 ± 0.026.28 ± 0.0563FG
MF2658.58 ± 0.065.16 ± 0.1160GH
MF5489.65 ± 0.075.65 ± 0.1659H
MF3809.68 ± 0.055.54 ± 0.0957H
MF2399.37 ± 0.104.68 ± 0.0750I
MF339.25 ± 0.044.66 ± 0.1950I
MF1788.96 ± 0.083.96 ± 0.0344J
MF3529.21 ± 0.143.74 ± 0.2641JK
MF37710.04 ± 0.054.06 ± 0.0740KL
MF2059.45 ± 0.113.49 ± 0.0237LM
MF3059.17 ± 0.073.18 ± 0.3135MN
MF1509.23 ± 0.05<1.00
MF2199.01 ± 0.11<1.00
MF3579.83 ± 0.06<1.00
MF5137.75 ± 0.11<1.00

L. brevis MF4939.37 ± 0.095.99 ± 0.2164EF
MF1059.22 ± 0.083.90 ± 0.1242JK
MF4949.54 ± 0.123.96 ± 0.3342JK
MF3438.80 ± 0.013.45 ± 0.0139KL
MF3149.41 ± 0.123.13 ± 0.0233N
MF1589.44 ± 0.04<1.00
MF3549.10 ± 0.08<1.00

P. ethanolidurans MF1799.54 ± 0.157.23 ± 0.0676B
MF1809.79 ± 0.017.09 ± 0.0472C
MF509.45 ± 0.043.79 ± 0.0540KL
MF489.15 ± 0.11<1.00
MF1079.01 ± 0.01<1.00
MF1679.02 ± 0.01<1.00
MF1949.16 ± 0.19<1.00
MF1969.37 ± 0.14<1.00
MF2149.41 ± 0.04<1.00
MF2519.19 ± 0.07<1.00
MF2699.21 ± 0.07<1.00

Values are expressed in mean ± standard error.

A–NValues with different letters within a column indicate significant differences between LAB strains (p < 0.05).

Resistance to bile salts is one of the most important selection criteria for probiotics since the small intestine and colon contain relatively high concentrations of bile salts which are toxic for living cells [5, 23]. It was reported that the different species of Lactobacillus showed significant variations in relation to their bile salt tolerance [24]. In this study, all studied L. plantarum and L. brevis strains showed varying levels of resistance to bile salts after 4 h of exposure whereas none of the examined P. ethanolidurans strains were able to withstand bile concentration of 0.3% (Table 2). In particular, 5 selected L. brevis strains were found to be highly tolerant to 0.3% oxgall exhibiting negligible reduction in viable counts (<1 log cycle) after 4 h of incubation (statistical groups labeled with the capital letters A, B, and AB in Table 2). These results were in accordance with the previous studies that showed that the lactobacilli possessed high tolerance to bile salts at 0.3% [5, 22]. In contrast, Sukumar and Ghosh [25] reported that Pediococcus spp. which were isolated from an Indian fermented food showed significant bile tolerance. The different survival rates for L. plantarum strains suggest that survival ability in the bile media is strain-dependent, as shown in previous reports [26, 27].
Table 2

Bile salt tolerance of LAB strains.

Species Strain number Initial counts (log cfu/mL) Survival after 4 h in the presence of 0.3% (w/v) bile salt (oxgall)
(log cfu/mL)%
L. plantarum MF2139.52 ± 0.079.44 ± 0.0799A
MF2058.22 ± 0.107.79 ± 0.1295B
MF3778.91 ± 0.008.41 ± 0.0294B
MF2397.68 ± 0.106.59 ± 0.1686C
MF1438.14 ± 0.076.84 ± 0.0984CD
MF3059.32 ± 0.077.51 ± 0.0981DE
MF1698.45 ± 0.166.69 ± 0.3079EF
MF1789.45 ± 0.047.17 ± 0.0276F
MF2659.62 ± 0.067.30 ± 0.0576F
MF339.35 ± 0.036.46 ± 0.1269G
MF5489.60 ± 0.006.43 ± 0.0767G
MF49.54 ± 0.025.23 ± 0.0355H
MF3039.41 ± 0.035.02 ± 0.0353H
MF3769.73 ± 0.004.54 ± 0.0547I
MF3809.50 ± 0.054.37 ± 0.0146I
MF3528.43 ± 0.053.77 ± 0.1045I
MF5569.50 ± 0.184.25 ± 0.0745I

L. brevis MF1059.06 ± 0.038.93 ± 0.1899A
MF3149.23 ± 0.099.18 ± 0.0199A
MF4949.52 ± 0.089.19 ± 0.1797AB
MF4938.96 ± 0.118.50 ± 0.1295B
MF3439.36 ± 0.158.81 ± 0.1694B

P. ethanolidurans MF509.63 ± 0.01<1.00
MF1799.51 ± 0.04<1.00
MF1809.48 ± 0.00<1.00

Values are expressed in mean ± standard error.

A–IValues with different letters within a column indicate significant differences between LAB strains (p < 0.05).

The combined effect of pepsin-pH 2.5 solution and pancreatin-bile salt solution (pH 8.0) aims at simulating the gastric juice and the intestine, respectively. The survival rates of LAB in simulated gastric and intestinal conditions are presented in Table 3. Lactobacillus plantarum and L. brevis strains had high survival rates in simulated gastric conditions except for L. brevis MF343, which could not survive after treatment by gastric juice. Although all studied L. plantarum and L. brevis strains could survive well in the presence of 0.3% oxgall alone, some of these strains were not able to withstand the simulated intestinal conditions since no viability was observed after 4 h of exposure. Therefore, it could be suggested that the decrease of viability was due to the pancreatin alone, or in synergy with bile salts. Pediococcus ethanolidurans strains were sensitive to both simulated gastric and intestinal conditions and were then discarded from further analysis. In general, all tested strains showed less resistance to intestinal conditions than gastric juice environment. This could be related to natural adaptation of LAB strains to low pH conditions since they are of pickle origin. Similarly, Grimoud et al. [28] reported that Lactobacillus strains had higher survival rates under simulated gastric conditions compared to intestinal conditions.
Table 3

Survival of LAB strains in simulated gastric and intestinal conditions.

Species Strain number Initial counts (log cfu/mL) Survival after 4 h in the pepsin-pH 2.5 solution Survival after 6 h in the pancreatin-bile salt solution (pH 8.0)
(log cfu/mL)%(log cfu/mL)%
L. plantarum MF48.20 ± 0.028.18 ± 0.20100A <1.00
MF2138.10 ± 0.178.08 ± 0.18100A <1.00
MF3768.32 ± 0.018.30 ± 0.05100A <1.00
MF3058.30 ± 0.158.23 ± 0.0399A <1.00
MF3528.30 ± 0.016.78 ± 0.1182B 4.11 ± 0.0150B
MF5488.25 ± 0.026.78 ± 0.1982B <1.00
MF1438.34 ± 0.116.60 ± 0.0379CD <1.00
MF2398.26 ± 0.036.54 ± 0.1479CD <1.00
MF2658.32 ± 0.146.48 ± 0.0978DE <1.00
MF3038.26 ± 0.036.30 ± 0.0276F 3.30 ± 0.0640C
MF2058.31 ± 0.046.08 ± 0.0773G 3.30 ± 0.1140C
MF3808.22 ± 0.016.00 ± 0.0173G 3.30 ± 0.0740C
MF5568.24 ± 0.096.00 ± 0.1673G 3.48 ± 0.0442C
MF1788.29 ± 0.155.51 ± 0.1966H 3.48 ± 0.1742C
MF3778.30 ± 0.015.48 ± 0.0566H 5.15 ± 0.0262A
MF1698.30 ± 0.035.43 ± 0.0865H 5.16 ± 0.0562A
MF338.24 ± 0.054.36 ± 0.1553I <1.00

L. brevis MF3148.34 ± 0.018.28 ± 0.0499A 3.48 ± 0.1642C
MF4948.20 ± 0.176.54 ± 0.0780C 5.18 ± 0.1363A
MF4938.27 ± 0.136.38 ± 0.0877EF <1.00
MF1058.31 ± 0.026.30 ± 0.0376F 5.08 ± 0.0161A
MF3438.29 ± 0.04<1.005.07 ± 0.1261A

P. ethanolidurans MF508.26 ± 0.06<1.00<1.00
MF1798.22 ± 0.11<1.00<1.00
MF1808.34 ± 0.09<1.00<1.00

Values are expressed in mean ± standard error.

A–IValues with different letters within a column indicate significant differences between LAB strains (p < 0.05).

3.2. Deconjugation of Bile Salts

None of the tested strains had the ability to deconjugate bile salts since the cultures did not form precipitate halos around the colonies on Bile salt-MRS Agar plates (data not shown). The absence of BSH (bile salt hydrolysis) activity in LAB strains isolated from table olives was also reported in some previous studies [9, 29]. However, it is not straightforward to interpret this result since it is uncertain whether BSH activity is a desirable trait for probiotics because excessive amounts of deconjugated bile salts may be potentially detrimental to the human host [9, 29].

3.3. Cholesterol Assimilation

High concentration of cholesterol in the blood streams of humans is generally recognized as a risk factor for coronary heart disease [24, 30]. Consumption of fermented milk products containing certain lactobacilli or bifidobacteria has been asserted to reduce serum cholesterol levels in humans [16, 24, 30]. In this study, the cholesterol assimilation ratios varied depending on the tested strains and ranged from 0.83 to 48.56%. Lactobacillus plantarum strains MF556, MF143, MF169, and MF33 (statistical groups labeled with the capital letters A and B) exhibited significantly higher amounts of cholesterol assimilation compared to other strains tested. As shown in Table 4, these four strains were found to reduce the cholesterol level by 48.56, 47.69, 44.26, and 43.57% in vitro tests, respectively, corresponding to the amount of cholesterol assimilation at ca. 20 μg/mL. The wide range of results has been reported on cholesterol assimilation levels of Lactobacillus spp. in previous studies: 13–38% [31], 14–22 μg/mL [30], and 56–62 μg/mL [24]. Cholesterol assimilation property appears to show variability across the species and strains. In addition, it is somewhat difficult to compare the present results with other reports since different initial concentration of cholesterol were used. Cholesterol lowering effect of probiotic bacteria has been explained by different proposed mechanisms which include bile salt hydrolase activity, production of compounds that inhibit enzymes such as 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A, and cholesterol assimilation [31]. In the present study, it could be suggested that cholesterol lowering effect of the tested strains was not related to their deconjugation ability of bile salts, in contrast with that found by other authors [16]. On the other hand, Walker and Gilliland [32] found no significant correlation between the ability of L. acidophilus to deconjugate bile acids and the ability to assimilate cholesterol.
Table 4

Cholesterol assimilation and surface hydrophobicity properties of LAB strains.

SpeciesStrain numberCholesterol assimilation (%)Surface hydrophobicity (%)
L. plantarum MF411.72 ± 0.92DEF 2.39 ± 1.57M
MF3343.57 ± 1.37B 3.14 ± 1.16LM
MF14347.69 ± 0.37A 39.62 ± 1.20G
MF16944.26 ± 0.41B 1.42 ± 1.42M
MF17812.00 ± 2.47DE 32.7 ± 0.56H
MF2053.85 ± 0.82I 3.37 ± 1.92LM
MF2131.89 ± 0.87I 3.18 ± 2.27LM
MF2399.80 ± 1.65EFG 52.02 ± 0.58E
MF2652.30 ± 1.10I 82.41 ± 0.59B
MF3039.76 ± 0.78EFG 0.91 ± 0.27M
MF30514.06 ± 0.69CD 17.72 ± 0.10I
MF3529.89 ± 0.46EFG 8.07 ± 0.27JK
MF3764.27 ± 1.05HI 43.72 ± 0.49F
MF3778.11 ± 0.14FG 2.01 ± 0.77M
MF3807.33 ± 0.64GH 0.66 ± 0.22M
MF5481.57 ± 0.37I 6.25 ± 0.42KL
MF55648.56 ± 1.24A 9.98 ± 1.60J

L. brevis MF10516.62 ± 2.88C 97.96 ± 0.10A
MF3141.79 ± 0.14I 8.53 ± 1.24JK
MF3438.43 ± 0.82EFG 0.17 ± 0.17M
MF4930.83 ± 0.09I 62.36 ± 2.59D
MF4941.61 ± 0.05I 67.29 ± 0.16C

Values are expressed in mean ± standard error.

A–MValues with different letters within a column indicate significant differences between LAB strains (p < 0.05).

Total cholesterol concentration of the control broth was measured as 45.72 ± 0.46 μg/mL.

3.4. Surface Hydrophobicity

The colonization in intestinal wall is considered as a desirable property of probiotic bacteria [33]. In this context, the adhesion ability to the intestinal epithelium, which is considered to be a prerequisite for colonization, is an important criterion for the selection of probiotic bacteria [34]. The surface properties, like autoaggregation and hydrophobicity, are used as a measurement directly related to ability to adhere to cell monolayers [29, 33]. Some authors found a correlation between hydrophobicity and adhesion ability [35], while some others reported that hydrophobicity values do not correlate with adhesion properties [27]. In the present study, significant differences (p < 0.05) in hydrophobicity values were found between LAB strains, even within the same species. At the species level, the hydrophobicity values found ranged from 0.66 to 82.41% (L. plantarum) and from 0.17 to 97.96% (L. brevis) (Table 4). The results revealed that the greatest hydrophobicity for n-hexadecane was observed for L. brevis MF105, L. plantarum MF265, L. brevis MF494, and L. brevis MF493 at 97.96%, 82.41%, 67.29%, and 62.36%, respectively. These four isolates may be considered potential probiotic cultures, from the adhesive point of view. Kumar et al. [36] reported that four Lactobacillus spp., isolated from indigenous pickled vegetables and fermented beverages, exhibited high cell surface hydrophobicity (>60%).

4. Conclusion

Although most of the characteristics tested could be assumed to be strain-dependent, L. plantarum and L. brevis species were found to possess desirable in vitro properties to a greater extent compared to P. ethanolidurans. It is difficult to find a strain having all desirable functional properties, and the selection criteria for potential probiotic candidates could therefore be dependent on the purpose of the product. For instance, L. plantarum strains MF556, MF143, MF169, and MF33 exhibited the highest in vitro cholesterol assimilation among the tested strains whereas the maximum hydrophobicity for n-hexadecane was observed for L. brevis MF105, L. plantarum MF265, L. brevis MF494, and L. brevis MF493. Since the strongest variation was found among the tested 22 strains with regard to their cholesterol assimilation and surface hydrophobicity properties, these eight strains could be selected as promising probiotic candidates for further investigation in vivo studies to evaluate their potential health benefits and their application in the food industry.
  21 in total

Review 1.  Quality assurance criteria for probiotic bacteria.

Authors:  E Tuomola; R Crittenden; M Playne; E Isolauri; S Salminen
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.045

2.  Determination of cholesterol using o-phthalaldehyde.

Authors:  L L Rudel; M D Morris
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 5.922

3.  Importance of lactobacilli in food and feed biotechnology.

Authors:  Giorgio Giraffa; Nina Chanishvili; Yantyati Widyastuti
Journal:  Res Microbiol       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 3.992

4.  Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic.

Authors:  Colin Hill; Francisco Guarner; Gregor Reid; Glenn R Gibson; Daniel J Merenstein; Bruno Pot; Lorenzo Morelli; Roberto Berni Canani; Harry J Flint; Seppo Salminen; Philip C Calder; Mary Ellen Sanders
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  Screening of probiotic activities of forty-seven strains of Lactobacillus spp. by in vitro techniques and evaluation of the colonization ability of five selected strains in humans.

Authors:  C N Jacobsen; V Rosenfeldt Nielsen; A E Hayford; P L Møller; K F Michaelsen; A Paerregaard; B Sandström; M Tvede; M Jakobsen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Phenotypic and genotypic identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional pickles of the Çubuk region in Turkey.

Authors:  Simel Bağder Elmacı; Mehmet Tokatlı; Derya Dursun; Filiz Özçelik; Pınar Şanlıbaba
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2014-11-18       Impact factor: 2.099

7.  Functional properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from kimchi.

Authors:  Heejae Lee; Hongsup Yoon; Yosep Ji; Hannah Kim; Hyunjoon Park; Jieun Lee; Heuynkil Shin; Wilhelm Holzapfel
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 5.277

8.  Production of probiotic cabbage juice by lactic acid bacteria.

Authors:  Kyung Young Yoon; Edward E Woodams; Yong D Hang
Journal:  Bioresour Technol       Date:  2005-08-24       Impact factor: 9.642

9.  Survival of lactic acid bacteria in the human stomach and adhesion to intestinal cells.

Authors:  P L Conway; S L Gorbach; B R Goldin
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  Strain-specific probiotics properties of Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus plantarum and Lactobacillus brevis isolates from Brazilian food products.

Authors:  Cíntia Lacerda Ramos; Line Thorsen; Rosane Freitas Schwan; Lene Jespersen
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 5.516

View more
  24 in total

1.  In vitro properties of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria originating from Ghanaian indigenous fermented milk products.

Authors:  Grace Adzo Motey; James Owusu-Kwarteng; Kwasi Obiri-Danso; Linda Aurelia Ofori; William Otoo Ellis; Lene Jespersen
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Potential Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria with Anti-Penicillium expansum Activity from Different Species of Tunisian Edible Snails.

Authors:  Ghada Rabaoui; Fernando Sánchez-Juanes; Mohamed Tebini; Karim Naghmouchi; Juan Luis Muñoz Bellido; Kamel Ben-Mahrez; Samia Réjiba
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  Comparison of probiotic Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy and Iranian traditional food products with those from human source on intestinal microbiota using BALB/C mice model.

Authors:  Samaneh Hatami; Masoud Yavarmanesh; Mojtaba Sankian; Seyed Ali Issazadeh
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Postbiotic metabolites, antioxidant and anticancer activities of probiotic Leuconostoc pseudomesenteroides strains in natural pickles.

Authors:  Yusuf Alan; Ahmet Savcı; Enver Fehim Koçpınar; Metin Ertaş
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 2.667

5.  Genomic and physiological analyses of an indigenous strain, Enterococcus faecium 17OM39.

Authors:  Vikas C Ghattargi; Yogesh S Nimonkar; Shaunak A Burse; Dimple Davray; Shreyas V Kumbhare; Sudarshan A Shetty; Meghana A Gaikwad; Mangesh V Suryavanshi; Swapnil P Doijad; Bhimashankar Utage; Om Prakash Sharma; Yogesh S Shouche; Bharati S Meti; Shrikant P Pawar
Journal:  Funct Integr Genomics       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.410

6.  Characterization of technological and probiotic properties of indigenous Lactobacillus spp. from south Brazil.

Authors:  Camila Agostini; Camila Eckert; Angélica Vincenzi; Bruna Lenhardt Machado; Bruna Cristina Jordon; João Pedro Kipper; Anja Dullius; Carlos Henrique Dullius; Daniel Neutzling Lehn; Raul Antonio Sperotto; Adriane Pozzobon; Camille Eichelberger Granada; Mônica Jachetti Maciel; Claucia Fernanda Volken de Souza
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  Aggregation, adhesion and efficacy studies of probiotic candidate Pediococcus acidilactici NCDC 252: a strain of dairy origin.

Authors:  Raman Kumar; Poonam Bansal; Jasbir Singh; Suman Dhanda; Jitender Kumar Bhardwaj
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Probiotic Potential and Gluten Hydrolysis Activity of Lactobacillus brevis KT16-2.

Authors:  Buket Kunduhoglu; Seda Hacioglu
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 4.609

9.  Probiotic Properties of Lactobacillus Species Isolated from Fermented Palm Sap in Thailand.

Authors:  Phoomjai Sornsenee; Kamonnut Singkhamanan; Surasak Sangkhathat; Phanvasri Saengsuwan; Chonticha Romyasamit
Journal:  Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 4.609

10.  Effects of Lactobacillus curvatus MG5246 on inflammatory markers in Porphyromonas gingivalis lipopolysaccharide-sensitized human gingival fibroblasts and periodontitis rat model.

Authors:  Jae-In Jung; Yong Gyeong Kim; Chang-Ho Kang; Jee-Young Imm
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 2.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.