PURPOSE: Evaluate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted spatiotemporally encoded (SPEN) methods to obtain apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps of fibroglandular human breast tissue, in the presence of silicone implants. METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers with breast augmentation were scanned at 3 Tesla (T) using customized SPEN sequences yielding separate silicone and water (1) H images in one scan, together with their corresponding diffusion-weightings. RESULTS: SPEN's ability to deliver multiple spectrally resolved images in a single scan, coupled to the method's substantial robustness to magnetic field heterogeneities, served to acquire ADC maps that could be freed from contributions that did not belong to fibroglandular tissue. CONCLUSION: SPEN-based sequences incorporating spectral discrimination and diffusion-weighting enable the acquisition of reliable ADC maps despite the presence of dominant signals from silicone implants, thereby opening new screening possibilities for the identification of malignancies in breast augmented patients.
PURPOSE: Evaluate the usefulness of diffusion-weighted spatiotemporally encoded (SPEN) methods to obtain apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps of fibroglandular human breast tissue, in the presence of silicone implants. METHODS: Seven healthy volunteers with breast augmentation were scanned at 3 Tesla (T) using customized SPEN sequences yielding separate silicone and water (1) H images in one scan, together with their corresponding diffusion-weightings. RESULTS: SPEN's ability to deliver multiple spectrally resolved images in a single scan, coupled to the method's substantial robustness to magnetic field heterogeneities, served to acquire ADC maps that could be freed from contributions that did not belong to fibroglandular tissue. CONCLUSION: SPEN-based sequences incorporating spectral discrimination and diffusion-weighting enable the acquisition of reliable ADC maps despite the presence of dominant signals from silicone implants, thereby opening new screening possibilities for the identification of malignancies in breast augmented patients.
Authors: Ryan Chamberlain; Jang-Yeon Park; Curt Corum; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Ugurbil; Clifford R Jack; Michael Garwood Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Wendie A Berg; Thuy Khanh Nguyen; Michael S Middleton; Mary Scott Soo; Gene Pennello; S Lori Brown Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Elizabeth S McDonald; Jennifer G Schopp; Sue Peacock; Wendy B DeMartini; Wendy D DeMartini; Habib Rahbar; Constance D Lehman; Savannah C Partridge Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Wolfgang Bogner; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Hubert Bickel; Marek Chmelik; Michael Weber; Thomas H Helbich; Siegfried Trattnig; Stephan Gruber Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Lisbet R Hölmich; Søren Friis; Jon P Fryzek; Ilse M Vejborg; Carsten Conrad; Susanne Sletting; Kim Kjøller; Joseph K McLaughlin; Jørgen H Olsen Journal: Arch Surg Date: 2003-07