Literature DB >> 22438442

Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging improves the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR breast examinations at 3.0 T.

Wolfgang Bogner1, Katja Pinker-Domenig, Hubert Bickel, Marek Chmelik, Michael Weber, Thomas H Helbich, Siegfried Trattnig, Stephan Gruber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To qualitatively and quantitatively compare the diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging based on standard single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in patients with breast cancer at 3.0 T.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional review board approval and written informed consent were obtained. Forty-seven patients with 49 histopathologically verified lesions were included in this study. In all patients, DW imaging, with single-shot echo-planar imaging and readout-segmented echo-planar imaging with comparable imaging parameters, was performed with a 3.0-T MR imager. Two independent readers visually assessed image quality and lesion conspicuity, and image properties (ie, signal-to-noise ratio, contrast, geometric distortions) were quantified. Regions of interest were drawn in all lesions (28 malignant, 21 benign) and in the normal breast parenchyma to investigate differences in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Diagnostic accuracy was calculated on the basis of an ADC threshold of 1.25 × 10(-3) mm(2)/sec.
RESULTS: Each reader found a higher diagnostic accuracy for readout-segmented (96%) than for single-shot (90%) echo-planar imaging. The area under the curve for readout-segmented echo-planar imaging (0.981) was significantly larger than for single-shot echo-planar imaging (0.867) (P = .026). There was no significant difference in the ADC obtained by using either DW imaging method. Lesion conspicuity and image quality of readout-segmented echo-planar imaging were rated superior to those of single-shot echo-planar imaging (P < .001). Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reduced geometric distortions by a factor of three.
CONCLUSION: DW imaging based on readout-segmented echo-planar imaging provided significantly higher image quality and lesion conspicuity than single-shot echo-planar imaging by reducing geometric distortions, image blurring, and artifact level with a clinical high-field-strength MR imager. Thereby, readout-segmented echo-planar imaging reached a higher diagnostic accuracy for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22438442     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12111494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  73 in total

1.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-guided MR Spectroscopy in Breast Lesions using Readout-Segmented Echo-Planar Imaging.

Authors:  Kun Sun; Weimin Chai; Caixia Fu; Ying Zhan; Kunwei Shen; Xianfu Luo; Fuhua Yan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast tumours at 3 Tesla and 7 Tesla: a comparison.

Authors:  S Gruber; L Minarikova; K Pinker; O Zaric; M Chmelik; B Strasser; P Baltzer; T Helbich; S Trattnig; W Bogner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging With Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping for Breast Cancer Detection as a Stand-Alone Parameter: Comparison With Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Linda Moy; Elizabeth J Sutton; Ritse M Mann; Michael Weber; Sunitha B Thakur; Maxine S Jochelson; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Elizabeth A Morris; Pascal At Baltzer; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging techniques for the purposes of radiotherapy planning in the prostate.

Authors:  G P Liney; L Holloway; T M Al Harthi; M Sidhom; D Moses; E Juresic; R Rai; D J Manton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Differential diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and nasopharyngeal lymphoma based on DCE-MRI and RESOLVE-DWI.

Authors:  Chengru Song; Peng Cheng; Jingliang Cheng; Yong Zhang; Mengtian Sun; Shanshan Xie; Xiaonan Zhang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison between readout-segmented and single-shot echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of cervical cancer staging.

Authors:  Weiliang Qian; Qian Chen; Zhongshuai Zhang; Hong Wang; Jibin Zhang; Jianming Xu
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  [Researcher of the month, December 2012. Dr. Wolfgang Bogner].

Authors:  Wolfgang Bogner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.704

8.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions: Region-of-interest placement and different ADC parameters influence apparent diffusion coefficient values.

Authors:  Hubert Bickel; Katja Pinker; Stephan Polanec; Heinrich Magometschnigg; Georg Wengert; Claudio Spick; Wolfgang Bogner; Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath; Thomas H Helbich; Pascal Baltzer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for the separation of benign from malignant BI-RADS 4/5 lesions found on breast MRI at 3T.

Authors:  Dorota J Wisner; Nathan Rogers; Vibhas S Deshpande; David N Newitt; Gerhard A Laub; David A Porter; John Kornak; Bonnie N Joe; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 10.  Diffusion-weighted breast MRI: Clinical applications and emerging techniques.

Authors:  Savannah C Partridge; Noam Nissan; Habib Rahbar; Averi E Kitsch; Eric E Sigmund
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.