Literature DB >> 27588294

Software Tools in Endoscopy - Nice to Have or Essential?

Oliver Möschler1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Documentation of findings and of the treatment implications resulting from them is one of the central tasks involved in medical work. The introduction of software tools for managing and providing technical support for this task is a logical development.
METHODS: A literature search was conducted in September 2015 using PubMed and the search terms 'gastrointestinal endoscopy AND electronic documentation' and 'software tools AND gastrointestinal endoscopy AND documentation'.
RESULTS: The requirements in relation to documentation, patient information and sedation, dealing with histological findings, materials logistics, recording video documents, and hygiene documentation are discussed.
CONCLUSION: Software tools are essential for managing basic documentation requirements. However, for many aspects of the documentation required in a modern endoscopy department, there are various - and sometimes substantial - gaps in the programs currently available. More intensive discussions need to take place regarding existing gaps and requirements, both with the suppliers concerned and among colleagues and specialist societies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endoscopy; Logistics; Quality requirements; Software tools

Year:  2016        PMID: 27588294      PMCID: PMC4988295          DOI: 10.1159/000443628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Visc Med        ISSN: 2297-4725


  7 in total

1.  [S3-guidelines "sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy" 2014 (AWMF register no. 021/014)].

Authors:  A Riphaus; T Wehrmann; J Hausmann; B Weber; S von Delius; M Jung; P Tonner; J Arnold; A Behrens; U Beilenhoff; H Bitter; D Domagk; S In der Smitten; B Kallinowski; A Meining; A Schaible; D Schilling; H Seifert; F Wappler; I Kopp
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.000

2.  [S2k guideline: quality requirements for gastrointestinal endoscopy, AWMF registry no. 021-022].

Authors:  U Denzer; U Beilenhoff; A Eickhoff; S Faiss; P Hüttl; S In der Smitten; R Jakobs; C Jenssen; M Keuchel; F Langer; M M Lerch; P Lynen Jansen; A May; R Menningen; G Moog; T Rösch; U Rosien; T Vowinkel; T Wehrmann; U Weickert
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.000

3.  Computerized endoscopic reporting is no more time-consuming than reporting with conventional methods.

Authors:  Jagdiesh K Soekhoe; Marcel J M Groenen; Astrid M van Ginneken; G Khaliq; Wilco Lesterhuis; Antonie J P van Tilburg; Rob J Th Ouwendijk
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 4.487

4.  Longitudinal comparative study on the influence of computers on reporting of clinical data.

Authors:  A Gouveia-Oliveira; V D Raposo; N C Salgado; I Almeida; C Nobre-Leitão; F G de Melo
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  [Gastroenterology in the German DRG-System 2011: a critical juncture].

Authors:  U Rosien
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  A quarantine process for the resolution of duodenoscope-associated transmission of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Andrew S Ross; Christopher Baliga; Punam Verma; Jeffrey Duchin; Michael Gluck
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 9.427

7.  Withdrawal of a novel-design duodenoscope ends outbreak of a VIM-2-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Charlotte J Verfaillie; Marco J Bruno; Anne F Voor in 't Holt; Jolanda G Buijs; Jan-Werner Poley; Arjo J Loeve; Juliette A Severin; Leo F Abel; Bert J Smit; Inge de Goeij; Margreet C Vos
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 10.093

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.