| Literature DB >> 26091668 |
Adam Cohen1, Mariko Sato2, Kenneth Aldape3, Clinton C Mason4, Kristin Alfaro-Munoz5, Lindsey Heathcock6, Sarah T South7,8, Lisa M Abegglen9, Joshua D Schiffman10,11, Howard Colman12.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status and grade define subgroups of diffuse gliomas differing based on age, tumor location, presentation, and prognosis. While some biologic differences between IDH mutated (IDH (mut)) and wild-type (IDH (wt)) gliomas are clear, the distinct alterations associated with progression of the two subtypes to glioblastoma (GBM, Grade IV) have not been well described. We analyzed copy number alterations (CNAs) across grades (Grade II-III and GBM) in both IDH (mut) and IDH (wt) infiltrating gliomas using molecular inversion probe arrays.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 26091668 PMCID: PMC4474351 DOI: 10.1186/s40478-015-0213-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Neuropathol Commun ISSN: 2051-5960 Impact factor: 7.801
Fig. 3a. Comparison of IDH wild type lower grade and grade IV gliomas. For each type of glioma, the chromosome map is shown. The top graph indicates the difference in the percent of samples with gains (blue) and deletions (red) at each locus between the two groups. Up means more common in lower grade gliomas and down means more common in grade IV gliomas. b. Comparison of IDH mutated, 1p/19q non-co-deleted lower grade and grade IV gliomas. For each type of glioma, the chromosome map is shown. The top graph indicates the difference in the percent of samples with gains (blue) and deletions (red) at each locus between the two groups. Up means more common in lower grade gliomas and down means more common in grade IV gliomas
Fig. 1a. Kaplan-Meier curves of five groups of gliomas determined by grade, IDH mutation status, and 1p/19q deletion. All 94 patients were included. b. Chromosome maps from GISTIC analysis of four subgroups of gliomas defined by IDH status and grade. The y-axis gives GISTIC q-values. Red indicates deletions and blue indicates gains. c. Chromosome maps from GISTIC analysis for grade II–III IDH mutated gliomas separated by 1p/19q status
Fig. 2In all chromosome maps, chromosomes are along the x-axis. The y-axis gives the percent of samples with deletion (red) or gain (blue) at that locus. For individual samples,chromosome abnormality calls are shown. a. Comparison of IDH wild type gliomas and IDH mutated gliomas. For each type of glioma, the chromosome map is shown. The top graph indicates the difference in the percent of samples with gains (blue) and deletions (red) at each locus between the two groups. Up means more common in IDH wild type gliomas and down means more common in IDH mutated gliomas. b. Hierarchical clustering of IDH wild type gliomas is shown below a chromosome map of all IDH wildtype gliomas. Grade is indicated by the rectangles next to the hierarchy tree with blue indicating grade IV and orange indicating lower grade. c. Hierarchical clustering for 1p/19q non-co-deleted, IDH mutated gliomas is shown below a chromosome map of all1p/19q non-co-deleted, IDH mutated gliomas. Grade is indicated by the rectangles next to the hierarchy tree with blue indicating grade IV and orange indicating lower grade
Fig. 4a. Scatter plot of the number of copy number alterations in the five groups of gliomas. Horizontal bar indicates mean with 95 % confidence interval shown. b. Example of a chromosome from one of the glioma samples with chromothripsis. c. Bar graph of the frequency of chromothripsis in each group of gliomas. d. Association of chromothripsis and p53 alterations in all glioma samples and stratified by grade
Fig. 5a. Venn diagrams of the percent of tumors in each of the 1p/19q non-co-deleted glioma groups with gain of EGFR, PTEN loss, and/or CDKN2A loss. Percents are given for intersecting regions. The diameter of each circle is proportional to the percent of tumors in each subgroup with a CNA affecting the gene. b. Heatmap of known glioma-associated genes and pathways in each of the four 1p/19q non-co-deleted groups of gliomas. Only chromosome abnormalities significant by GISTIC were included. Blue indicates gain and red indicates loss. The strength of the color indicates the percent of tumors with that alteration