Literature DB >> 21884817

Detailed characterization of alterations of chromosomes 7, 9, and 10 in glioblastomas as assessed by single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Inês Crespo1, Ana Luísa Vital, Ana Belen Nieto, Olinda Rebelo, Hermínio Tão, Maria Celeste Lopes, Catarina Resende Oliveira, Pim J French, Alberto Orfao, María Dolores Tabernero.   

Abstract

Glioblastomas are cytogenetically heterogeneous tumors that frequently display alterations of chromosomes 7, 9p, and 10q. We used high-density (500K) single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays to investigate genome-wide copy number alterations and loss of heterozygosity in 35 primary glioblastomas. We focused on the identification and detailed characterization of alterations involving the most frequently altered chromosomes (chromosomes 7, 9, and 10), the identification of distinct prognostic subgroups of glioblastomas based on the cytogenetic patterns of alteration for these chromosomes, and validation of their prognostic impact in a larger series of tumors from public databases. Gains of chromosome 7 (97%), with or without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification, and losses of chromosomes 9p (83%) and 10 (91%) were the most frequent alterations. Such alterations defined five different cytogenetic groups with a significant effect on patient survival; notably, EGFR amplification (29%) was associated with a better survival among older patients, as confirmed by multivariate analysis of a larger series of glioblastomas from the literature. In addition, our results provide further evidence about the relevance of other genes (eg, EGFR, CDKN2A/B, MTAP) in the pathogenesis of glioblastomas. Altogether, our results confirm the cytogenetic heterogeneity of glioblastomas and suggest that their stratification based on combined assessment of cytogenetic alterations involving chromosomes 7, 9, and 10 may contribute to the prognostic evaluation of glioblastomas.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Investigative Pathology and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21884817      PMCID: PMC3194060          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  79 in total

Review 1.  Brain tumors.

Authors:  L M DeAngelis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-01-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Association of chromosome 7, chromosome 10 and EGFR gene amplification in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  C Lopez-Gines; M Cerda-Nicolas; R Gil-Benso; A Pellin; J A Lopez-Guerrero; R Callaghan; R Benito; P Roldan; J Piquer; J Llacer; J Barbera
Journal:  Clin Neuropathol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.368

3.  High-resolution genome-wide mapping of genetic alterations in human glial brain tumors.

Authors:  Markus Bredel; Claudia Bredel; Dejan Juric; Griffith R Harsh; Hannes Vogel; Lawrence D Recht; Branimir I Sikic
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Impact of genotype and morphology on the prognosis of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Matthias C Schmidt; Sven Antweiler; Nina Urban; Wolf Mueller; A Kuklik; Birgit Meyer-Puttlitz; Otmar D Wiestler; David N Louis; Rolf Fimmers; Andreas von Deimling
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.685

5.  Monosomy of chromosome 10 associated with dysregulation of epidermal growth factor signaling in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Ajay K Yadav; Jaclyn J Renfrow; Denise M Scholtens; Hehuang Xie; George E Duran; Claudia Bredel; Hannes Vogel; James P Chandler; Arnab Chakravarti; Pierre A Robe; Sunit Das; Adrienne C Scheck; John A Kessler; Marcelo B Soares; Branimir I Sikic; Griffith R Harsh; Markus Bredel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and labeling index are independent prognostic factors in glial tumor outcome.

Authors:  M C Etienne; J L Formento; C Lebrun-Frenay; J Gioanni; M Chatel; P Paquis; C Bernard; A Courdi; R J Bensadoun; J P Pignol; M Francoual; P Grellier; M Frenay; G Milano
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme is not influenced by altered expression of p16, p53, EGFR, MDM2 or Bcl-2 genes.

Authors:  E W Newcomb; H Cohen; S R Lee; S K Bhalla; J Bloom; R L Hayes; D C Miller
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 6.508

8.  High-resolution genomic copy number profiling of glioblastoma multiforme by single nucleotide polymorphism DNA microarray.

Authors:  Dong Yin; Seishi Ogawa; Norihiko Kawamata; Patrizia Tunici; Gaetano Finocchiaro; Marica Eoli; Christian Ruckert; Thien Huynh; Gentao Liu; Motohiro Kato; Masashi Sanada; Anna Jauch; Martin Dugas; Keith L Black; H Phillip Koeffler
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 5.852

9.  Characterization of novel and complex genomic aberrations in glioblastoma using a 32K BAC array.

Authors:  Helena Nord; Christian Hartmann; Robin Andersson; Uwe Menzel; Susan Pfeifer; Arkadiusz Piotrowski; Adam Bogdan; Wojciech Kloc; Johanna Sandgren; Tommie Olofsson; Göran Hesselager; Erik Blomquist; Jan Komorowski; Andreas von Deimling; Carl E G Bruder; Jan P Dumanski; Teresita Díaz de Ståhl
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Ploidy status and copy number aberrations in primary glioblastomas defined by integrated analysis of allelic ratios, signal ratios and loss of heterozygosity using 500K SNP Mapping Arrays.

Authors:  Paul J Gardina; Ken C Lo; Walter Lee; John K Cowell; Yaron Turpaz
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  29 in total

1.  Joint Clustering of Single-Cell Sequencing and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Data for Reconstructing Clonal Heterogeneity in Cancers.

Authors:  Xuecong Fu; Haoyun Lei; Yifeng Tao; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Irianna Torres; Michael Dean; Thomas Ried; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 1.479

2.  Analysis of somatic mutations in 131 human brains reveals aging-associated hypermutability.

Authors:  Taejeong Bae; Liana Fasching; Yifan Wang; Joo Heon Shin; Milovan Suvakov; Yeongjun Jang; Scott Norton; Caroline Dias; Jessica Mariani; Alexandre Jourdon; Feinan Wu; Arijit Panda; Reenal Pattni; Yasmine Chahine; Rebecca Yeh; Rosalinda C Roberts; Anita Huttner; Joel E Kleinman; Thomas M Hyde; Richard E Straub; Christopher A Walsh; Alexander E Urban; James F Leckman; Daniel R Weinberger; Flora M Vaccarino; Alexej Abyzov
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 63.714

3.  Genetic and pathologic evolution of early secondary gliosarcoma.

Authors:  Kari-Elise T Codispoti; Stacy Mosier; Robert Ramsey; Ming-Tseh Lin; Fausto J Rodriguez
Journal:  Brain Tumor Pathol       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Whole Chromosome 7 Gain Predicts Higher Risk of Recurrence in Pediatric Pilocytic Astrocytomas Independently From KIAA1549-BRAF Fusion Status.

Authors:  Jacquelyn J Roth; Tamara M Fierst; Angela J Waanders; Li Yimei; Jaclyn A Biegel; Mariarita Santi
Journal:  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.685

5.  Tumor Copy Number Deconvolution Integrating Bulk and Single-Cell Sequencing Data.

Authors:  Haoyun Lei; Bochuan Lyu; E Michael Gertz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Xulian Shi; Kui Wu; Guibo Li; Liqin Xu; Yong Hou; Michael Dean; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  J Comput Biol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 1.479

Review 6.  Cell biology of glioblastoma multiforme: from basic science to diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  George S Stoyanov; Deyan Dzhenkov; Peter Ghenev; Bogomil Iliev; Yavor Enchev; Anton B Tonchev
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Amplified and homozygously deleted genes in glioblastoma: impact on gene expression levels.

Authors:  Inês Crespo; Hermínio Tão; Ana Belen Nieto; Olinda Rebelo; Patrícia Domingues; Ana Luísa Vital; Maria del Carmen Patino; Marcos Barbosa; Maria Celeste Lopes; Catarina Resende Oliveira; Alberto Orfao; María Dolores Tabernero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  DNA copy number analysis of Grade II-III and Grade IV gliomas reveals differences in molecular ontogeny including chromothripsis associated with IDH mutation status.

Authors:  Adam Cohen; Mariko Sato; Kenneth Aldape; Clinton C Mason; Kristin Alfaro-Munoz; Lindsey Heathcock; Sarah T South; Lisa M Abegglen; Joshua D Schiffman; Howard Colman
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol Commun       Date:  2015-06-20       Impact factor: 7.801

9.  Sleeping Beauty mouse models identify candidate genes involved in gliomagenesis.

Authors:  Irina Vyazunova; Vilena I Maklakova; Samuel Berman; Ishani De; Megan D Steffen; Won Hong; Hayley Lincoln; A Sorana Morrissy; Michael D Taylor; Keiko Akagi; Cameron W Brennan; Fausto J Rodriguez; Lara S Collier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Tumor heterogeneity assessed by sequencing and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) data.

Authors:  Haoyun Lei; E Michael Gertz; Alejandro A Schäffer; Xuecong Fu; Yifeng Tao; Kerstin Heselmeyer-Haddad; Irianna Torres; Guibo Li; Liqin Xu; Yong Hou; Kui Wu; Xulian Shi; Michael Dean; Thomas Ried; Russell Schwartz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 6.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.