Literature DB >> 11701945

Frequent mitotic errors in tumor cells of genetically micro-heterogeneous glioblastomas.

S Loeper1, B F Romeike, N Heckmann, V Jung, W Henn, W Feiden, K D Zang, S Urbschat.   

Abstract

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is characterized by intratumoral heterogeneity as to both histomorphology and genetic changes, displaying a wide variety of numerical chromosome aberrations the most common of which are monosomy 10 and trisomy 7. Moreover, GBM in vitro are known to have variable karyotypes within a given tumor cell culture leading to rapid karyotype evolution through a high incidence of secondary numerical chromosome aberrations. The aim of our study was to investigate to what extent this mitotic instability of glioblastoma cells is also present in vivo. We assessed the spatial distribution patterns of numerical chromosome aberrations in vivo in a series of 24 GBM using two-color in situ hybridization for chromosomes 7/10, 8/17, and 12/18 on consecutive 6-microm paraffin-embedded tissue slides. The chromosome aberration patterns were compared with the histomorphology of the investigated tumor assessed from a consecutive HE-stained section, and with the in vitro karyotype of cell cultures established from the tumors. All investigated chromosomes showed mitotic instability, i.e., numerical aberrations within significant amounts of tumor cells in a scattered distribution through the tumor tissue. As to chromosomes 10 and 17, only monosomy occurred, as to chromosome 7 only trisomy/polysomy, apparently as a result of selection in favor of the respective aberration. Conversely, chromosomes 8, 12, and 18 displayed scattered patterns of monosomy as well as trisomy within a given tumor reflecting a high mitotic error rate without selective effects. The karyotypes of the tumor cell cultures showed less variability of numerical aberrations apparently due to clonal adaptation to in vitro conditions. We conclude that glioblastoma cells in vivo are characterized by an extensive tendency to mitotic errors. The resulting clonal diversity of chromosomally aberrant cells may be an important biological constituent of the well-known ability of glioblastomas to preserve viable tumor cell clones under adaptive stress in vivo, in clinical terms to rapidly recur after antitumoral therapy including radio- or chemotherapy. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11701945     DOI: 10.1159/000048773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet        ISSN: 0301-0171


  20 in total

Review 1.  Molecular heterogeneity of glioblastoma and its clinical relevance.

Authors:  Katalin Eder; Bernadette Kalman
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  TRIM44 is indispensable for glioma cell proliferation and cell cycle progression through AKT/p21/p27 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Xia Zhou; Yadong Yang; Pengcheng Ma; Na Wang; Dong Yang; Qiu Tu; Bin Sun; Tingxiu Xiang; Xudong Zhao; Zongliu Hou; Xiangdong Fang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Patients with high-grade gliomas harboring deletions of chromosomes 9p and 10q benefit from temozolomide treatment.

Authors:  Silke Wemmert; Ralf Ketter; Jörg Rahnenführer; Niko Beerenwinkel; Martin Strowitzki; Wolfgang Feiden; Christian Hartmann; Thomas Lengauer; Florian Stockhammer; Klaus D Zang; Eckart Meese; Wolf-Ingo Steudel; Andreas von Deimling; Steffi Urbschat
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  RhoA regulates invasion of glioma cells via the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase pathway under hypoxia.

Authors:  Jiao Jian Tong; Zhang Yan; Ren Jian; Huang Tao; Ouyang Tao Hui; Chen Jian
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Multifarious proteomic signatures and regional heterogeneity in glioblastomas.

Authors:  Chul-Kee Park; Ji Hye Jung; Sung-Hye Park; Hee-Won Jung; Byung-Kyu Cho
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Knock down of HIF-1alpha in glioma cells reduces migration in vitro and invasion in vivo and impairs their ability to form tumor spheres.

Authors:  Olga Méndez; Jiri Zavadil; Mine Esencay; Yevgeniy Lukyanov; Daniel Santovasi; Shu-Chi Wang; Elizabeth W Newcomb; David Zagzag
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 27.401

7.  Identification of prognostic gene signatures of glioblastoma: a study based on TCGA data analysis.

Authors:  Yong-Wan Kim; Dimpy Koul; Se Hoon Kim; Agda Karina Lucio-Eterovic; Pablo R Freire; Jun Yao; Jing Wang; Jonas S Almeida; Ken Aldape; W K Alfred Yung
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Chromosome instability, chromosome transcriptome, and clonal evolution of tumor cell populations.

Authors:  ChongFeng Gao; Kyle Furge; Julie Koeman; Karl Dykema; Yanli Su; Mary Lou Cutler; Adam Werts; Pete Haak; George F Vande Woude
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  [Classification and documentation of diffuse gliomas].

Authors:  B F M Romeike
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Chromosomal Instability Affects the Tumorigenicity of Glioblastoma Tumor-Initiating Cells.

Authors:  Kristina M Godek; Monica Venere; Quilian Wu; Kevin D Mills; William F Hickey; Jeremy N Rich; Duane A Compton
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 39.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.