OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pharmacy student perceptions of team-based learning (TBL) vs traditional lecture-based learning formats. METHODS: First professional year pharmacy students (N=111) at two universities used TBL in different courses during different semesters (fall vs spring). Students completed a 22-item team perceptions instrument before and after the fall semester. A 14-item teaching style preference instrument was completed at the end of the spring semester. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Students who experienced TBL in the fall and went back to traditional format in the spring reported improved perceptions of teams and preferred TBL format over a traditional format more than students who experienced a traditional format followed by TBL. Students at both universities agreed that the TBL format assists with critical-thinking, problem-solving, and examination preparation. Students also agreed that teams should consist of individuals with different personalities and learning styles. CONCLUSION: When building teams, faculty members should consider ways to diversify teams by considering different views, perspectives, and strengths. Offering TBL early in the curriculum prior to traditional lecture-based formats is better received by students, as evidenced by anecdotal reports from students possibly because it allows students time to realize the benefits and assist them in building teamwork-related skills.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pharmacy student perceptions of team-based learning (TBL) vs traditional lecture-based learning formats. METHODS: First professional year pharmacy students (N=111) at two universities used TBL in different courses during different semesters (fall vs spring). Students completed a 22-item team perceptions instrument before and after the fall semester. A 14-item teaching style preference instrument was completed at the end of the spring semester. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Students who experienced TBL in the fall and went back to traditional format in the spring reported improved perceptions of teams and preferred TBL format over a traditional format more than students who experienced a traditional format followed by TBL. Students at both universities agreed that the TBL format assists with critical-thinking, problem-solving, and examination preparation. Students also agreed that teams should consist of individuals with different personalities and learning styles. CONCLUSION: When building teams, faculty members should consider ways to diversify teams by considering different views, perspectives, and strengths. Offering TBL early in the curriculum prior to traditional lecture-based formats is better received by students, as evidenced by anecdotal reports from students possibly because it allows students time to realize the benefits and assist them in building teamwork-related skills.
Authors: Anita Williams Woolley; Christopher F Chabris; Alex Pentland; Nada Hashmi; Thomas W Malone Journal: Science Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Suzanne Novak; Sonalee Shah; James P Wilson; Kenneth A Lawson; Robert D Salzman Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Michelle Z Farland; Brigitte L Sicat; Andrea S Franks; Karen S Pater; Melissa S Medina; Adam M Persky Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2013-10-14 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Frank Romanelli; Denise H Rhoney; Esther P Black; Jeannine Conway; Daniel R Kennedy Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Tami L Remington; Barry E Bleske; Tracy Bartholomew; Michael P Dorsch; Sally K Guthrie; Kristin C Klein; Jeffrey M Tingen; Trisha D Wells Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Cassian Cremerius; Gertraud Gradl-Dietsch; Frank J P Beeres; Björn -Christian Link; Lea Hitpaß; Sven Nebelung; Klemens Horst; Christian David Weber; Carl Neuerburg; Daphne Eschbach; Christopher Bliemel; Matthias Knobe Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2020-01-10 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Rebecca Widder-Prewett; Juanita A Draime; Ginger Cameron; Douglas Anderson; Mark Pinkerton; Aleda M H Chen Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 2.047
Authors: Kristin K Janke; Robert A Bechtol; Stephanie James; Gardner Lepp; Rebecca Moote; Peter Clapp Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 2.047