Literature DB >> 29681667

Students' Understanding and Perceptions of Assigned Team Roles in a Classroom Laboratory Environment.

Laura E Ott1, Kerrie Kephart2, Kathleen Stolle-McAllister3, William R LaCourse1,4.   

Abstract

Using a cooperative learning framework in a quantitative reasoning laboratory course, students were assigned to static teams of four in which they adopted roles that rotated regularly. The roles included: team leader, protocol manager, data recorder, and researcher. Using a mixed-methods approach, we investigated students' perceptions of the team roles and specifically addressed students' understanding of the roles, students' beliefs in their ability to enact the roles, and whether working with assigned team roles supported the teams to work effectively and cohesively. Although students expressed confidence in their understanding of the team roles, their understanding differed from the initial descriptions. This suggests that students' understanding of team roles may be influenced by a variety of factors, including their experiences within their teams. Students also reported that some roles appeared to lack a purpose, implying that for roles to be successful, they must have a clear purpose. Finally, the fact that many students reported ignoring the team roles suggests that students do not perceive roles as a requirement for team productivity and cohesion. On the basis of these findings, we provide recommendations for instructors wishing to establish a classroom group laboratory environment.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29681667      PMCID: PMC5909383     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Coll Sci Teach        ISSN: 0047-231X


  6 in total

1.  Student Perceptions of Team-based Learning vs Traditional Lecture-based Learning.

Authors:  Tracy R Frame; Stephanie M Cailor; Rebecca J Gryka; Aleda M Chen; Mary E Kiersma; Lorin Sheppard
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings.

Authors:  David Lopatto
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2004

3.  Team-based learning in the gross anatomy laboratory improves academic performance and students' attitudes toward teamwork.

Authors:  Tiffany W Huitt; Anita Killins; William S Brooks
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 5.958

4.  Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning.

Authors:  David Lopatto
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  A broadly implementable research course in phage discovery and genomics for first-year undergraduate students.

Authors:  Tuajuanda C Jordan; Sandra H Burnett; Susan Carson; Steven M Caruso; Kari Clase; Randall J DeJong; John J Dennehy; Dee R Denver; David Dunbar; Sarah C R Elgin; Ann M Findley; Chris R Gissendanner; Urszula P Golebiewska; Nancy Guild; Grant A Hartzog; Wendy H Grillo; Gail P Hollowell; Lee E Hughes; Allison Johnson; Rodney A King; Lynn O Lewis; Wei Li; Frank Rosenzweig; Michael R Rubin; Margaret S Saha; James Sandoz; Christopher D Shaffer; Barbara Taylor; Louise Temple; Edwin Vazquez; Vassie C Ware; Lucia P Barker; Kevin W Bradley; Deborah Jacobs-Sera; Welkin H Pope; Daniel A Russell; Steven G Cresawn; David Lopatto; Cheryl P Bailey; Graham F Hatfull
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Think 500, not 50! A scalable approach to student success in STEM.

Authors:  William R LaCourse; Kathy Lee Sutphin; Laura E Ott; Kenneth I Maton; Patrice McDermott; Charles Bieberich; Philip Farabaugh; Philip Rous
Journal:  BMC Proc       Date:  2017-12-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.