Literature DB >> 26089435

Parallel Evolution and Lineage-Specific Expansion of RNA Editing in Ctenophores.

Andrea B Kohn1, Rachel S Sanford2, Masa-aki Yoshida3, Leonid L Moroz4.   

Abstract

RNA editing is a process of targeted alterations of nucleotides in all types of RNA molecules (e.g., rRNA, tRNA, mRNA, and miRNA). As a result, the transcriptional output differs from its genomic DNA template. RNA editing can be defined both by biochemical mechanisms and by enzymes that perform these reactions. There are high levels of RNA editing detected in the mammalian nervous system, suggesting that nervous systems use this mechanism to increase protein diversity, because the post-transcription modifications lead to new gene products with novel functions. By re-annotating the ctenophore genomes, we found that the number of predicted RNA-editing enzymes is comparable to the numbers in mammals, but much greater than in other non-bilaterian basal metazoans. However, the overall molecular diversity of RNA-editing enzymes in ctenophores is lower, suggesting a possible "compensation" by an expansion of the ADAT1-like subfamily in this lineage. In two genera of ctenophores, Pleurobrachia and Mnemiopsis, there are high levels of expression for RNA-editing enzymes in their aboral organs, the integrative center involved in control of locomotion and geotaxis. This finding supports the hypothesis that RNA editing is correlated with the complexity of tissues and behaviors. Smaller numbers of RNA-editing enzymes in Porifera and Placozoa also correlates with the primary absence of neural and muscular systems in these lineages. In ctenophores, the expansion of the RNA-editing machinery can also provide mechanisms that support the remarkable capacity for regeneration in these animals. In summary, despite their compact genomes, a wide variety of epigenomic mechanisms employed by ctenophores and other non-bilaterian basal metazoans can provide novel insights into the evolutionary origins of biological novelties.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. All rights reserved. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26089435      PMCID: PMC4836447          DOI: 10.1093/icb/icv065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Comp Biol        ISSN: 1540-7063            Impact factor:   3.326


  77 in total

1.  Mutations in RNAi rescue aberrant chemotaxis of ADAR mutants.

Authors:  Leath A Tonkin; Brenda L Bass
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Doing it in reverse: 3'-to-5' polymerization by the Thg1 superfamily.

Authors:  Jane E Jackman; Jonatha M Gott; Michael W Gray
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Identifying mRNA editing deaminase targets by RNA-Seq.

Authors:  Brad R Rosenberg; Scott Dewell; F Nina Papavasiliou
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Functions and regulation of RNA editing by ADAR deaminases.

Authors:  Kazuko Nishikura
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 5.  A-to-I and C-to-U editing within transfer RNAs.

Authors:  A A H Su; L Randau
Journal:  Biochemistry (Mosc)       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.487

Review 6.  Determinants of tRNA editing and modification: avoiding conundrums, affecting function.

Authors:  Zdeněk Paris; Ian M C Fleming; Juan D Alfonzo
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 7.727

7.  The Trichoplax genome and the nature of placozoans.

Authors:  Mansi Srivastava; Emina Begovic; Jarrod Chapman; Nicholas H Putnam; Uffe Hellsten; Takeshi Kawashima; Alan Kuo; Therese Mitros; Asaf Salamov; Meredith L Carpenter; Ana Y Signorovitch; Maria A Moreno; Kai Kamm; Jane Grimwood; Jeremy Schmutz; Harris Shapiro; Igor V Grigoriev; Leo W Buss; Bernd Schierwater; Stephen L Dellaporta; Daniel S Rokhsar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  The AID/APOBEC family of nucleic acid mutators.

Authors:  Silvestro G Conticello
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 9.  Dynamic regulation of RNA editing of ion channels and receptors in the mammalian nervous system.

Authors:  Bao Zhen Tan; Hua Huang; Runyi Lam; Tuck Wah Soong
Journal:  Mol Brain       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.041

Review 10.  Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs): RNA-editing enzymes.

Authors:  Liam P Keegan; Anne Leroy; Duncan Sproul; Mary A O'Connell
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2004-02-02       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Biodiversity Meets Neuroscience: From the Sequencing Ship (Ship-Seq) to Deciphering Parallel Evolution of Neural Systems in Omic's Era.

Authors:  Leonid L Moroz
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.326

2.  Unbiased View of Synaptic and Neuronal Gene Complement in Ctenophores: Are There Pan-neuronal and Pan-synaptic Genes across Metazoa?

Authors:  Leonid L Moroz; Andrea B Kohn
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 3.326

Review 3.  ADAR RNA editing below the backbone.

Authors:  Liam Keegan; Anzer Khan; Dragana Vukic; Mary O'Connell
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  A-to-I RNA Editing in the Earliest-Diverging Eumetazoan Phyla.

Authors:  Hagit T Porath; Amos A Schaffer; Paulina Kaniewska; Shahar Alon; Eli Eisenberg; Joshua Rosenthal; Erez Y Levanon; Oren Levy
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Independent origins of neurons and synapses: insights from ctenophores.

Authors:  Leonid L Moroz; Andrea B Kohn
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.