Gulfidan Bitirgen1, Ahmet Ozkagnici1, Banu Bozkurt2, Rayaz A Malik3. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Konya 42080, Turkey. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya 42075, Turkey. 3. Centre for Endocrinology and Diabetes, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9NT, UK.
Abstract
AIM: To quantify corneal ultrastructure using laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in patients with keratoconus and control subjects. METHODS: Unscarred corneas of 78 keratoconic subjects without a history of contact lens use and 36 age-matched control subjects were evaluated with slit-lamp examination (SLE), corneal topography and laser scanning IVCM. One eye was randomly chosen for analysis. Anterior and posterior stromal keratocyte, endothelial cell and basal epithelial cell densities and sub-basal nerve structure were evaluated. RESULTS: IVCM qualitatively demonstrated enlarged basal epithelial cells, structural changes in sub-basal and stromal nerve fibers, abnormal stromal keratocytes and keratocyte nuclei, and pleomorphism and enlargement of endothelial cells. Compared with control subjects, significant reductions in basal epithelial cell density (5817±306 cells/mm(2) vs 4802±508 cells/mm(2), P<0.001), anterior stromal keratocyte density (800±111 cells/mm(2) vs 555±115 cells/mm(2), P<0.001), posterior stromal keratocyte density (333±34 cells/mm(2) vs 270±47 cells/mm(2), P<0.001), endothelial cell density (2875±223 cells/mm(2) vs 2686±265 cells/mm(2), P<0.001), sub-basal nerve fiber density (31.2±8.4 nerves/mm(2) vs 18.1±9.2 nerves/mm(2), P<0.001), sub-basal nerve fiber length (21.4±3.4 mm/mm(2) vs 16.1±5.1 mm/mm(2), P<0.001), and sub-basal nerve branch density (median 50.0 (first quartile 31.2 - third quartile 68.7) nerve branches/mm(2) vs median 25.0 (first quartile 6.2 - third quartile 45.3) nerve branches/mm(2), P<0.001) were observed in patients with keratoconus. CONCLUSION: Significant microstructural abnormalities were identified in all corneal layers in the eyes of subjects with keratoconus using IVCM. This non-invasive in vivo technique provides an important means to define and follow progress of microstructural changes in patients with keratoconus.
AIM: To quantify corneal ultrastructure using laser scanning in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) in patients with keratoconus and control subjects. METHODS: Unscarred corneas of 78 keratoconic subjects without a history of contact lens use and 36 age-matched control subjects were evaluated with slit-lamp examination (SLE), corneal topography and laser scanning IVCM. One eye was randomly chosen for analysis. Anterior and posterior stromal keratocyte, endothelial cell and basal epithelial cell densities and sub-basal nerve structure were evaluated. RESULTS: IVCM qualitatively demonstrated enlarged basal epithelial cells, structural changes in sub-basal and stromal nerve fibers, abnormal stromal keratocytes and keratocyte nuclei, and pleomorphism and enlargement of endothelial cells. Compared with control subjects, significant reductions in basal epithelial cell density (5817±306 cells/mm(2) vs 4802±508 cells/mm(2), P<0.001), anterior stromal keratocyte density (800±111 cells/mm(2) vs 555±115 cells/mm(2), P<0.001), posterior stromal keratocyte density (333±34 cells/mm(2) vs 270±47 cells/mm(2), P<0.001), endothelial cell density (2875±223 cells/mm(2) vs 2686±265 cells/mm(2), P<0.001), sub-basal nerve fiber density (31.2±8.4 nerves/mm(2) vs 18.1±9.2 nerves/mm(2), P<0.001), sub-basal nerve fiber length (21.4±3.4 mm/mm(2) vs 16.1±5.1 mm/mm(2), P<0.001), and sub-basal nerve branch density (median 50.0 (first quartile 31.2 - third quartile 68.7) nerve branches/mm(2) vs median 25.0 (first quartile 6.2 - third quartile 45.3) nerve branches/mm(2), P<0.001) were observed in patients with keratoconus. CONCLUSION: Significant microstructural abnormalities were identified in all corneal layers in the eyes of subjects with keratoconus using IVCM. This non-invasive in vivo technique provides an important means to define and follow progress of microstructural changes in patients with keratoconus.
Entities:
Keywords:
corneal nerves; in vivo confocal microscopy; keratoconus
Authors: Mitra Tavakoli; Cristian Quattrini; Caroline Abbott; Panagiotis Kallinikos; Andrew Marshall; Joanne Finnigan; Philip Morgan; Nathan Efron; Andrew J M Boulton; Rayaz A Malik Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-04-30 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Shengsheng Wei; Jing Li; Yong Li; Yaohua Zhang; Yan Cai; Jing Du; Jianguo Liu; Yan Wang Journal: Int Ophthalmol Date: 2022-09-24 Impact factor: 2.029
Authors: Lóránt Dienes; Huba J Kiss; Kristóf Perényi; Zoltán Z Nagy; M Carmen Acosta; Juana Gallar; Illés Kovács Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 3.240