Literature DB >> 17481941

Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: methods and findings to date.

H Wagner1, J T Barr, K Zadnik.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To describe baseline and longitudinal findings of the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study.
METHODS: The CLEK Study is an 8-year, multi-center, natural history study of 1209 patients with keratoconus who were examined annually for 8 years. Its goals are to prospectively characterize changes in vision, corneal curvature, corneal status, and vision-specific quality of life.
RESULTS: CLEK Study subjects had a mean age at baseline of 39.3+/-10.9 years. At study entry, 65% of the patients wore rigid contact lenses, and 14% reported a family history of the disease. Subjects exhibited a 7-year decrease in high- (2.03 letters) and low- (4.06 letters) contrast, best-corrected visual acuity, with 19% demonstrating decreases of 10 or more letters in high-contrast, best-corrected acuity and 31% of subjects demonstrating decreases of 10 or more letters in low-contrast, best-corrected acuity in at least one eye. Subjects exhibited an average 8-year increase in corneal curvature of 1.60D in the flat corneal meridian, with 24% demonstrating increases of 3.00D or more. The 8-year incidence of corneal scarring was 20%, with younger age, corneal staining, steeper baseline corneal curvature, contact lens wear, and poorer low-contrast visual acuity predictive of corneal scarring. Data from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire suggest that the effect of keratoconus on vision-specific quality of life is disproportionate to its low prevalence and clinical severity.
CONCLUSION: Although we report measures of disease severity and visual function across the CLEK sample, clinicians can begin to envisage the course of keratoconus in individual patients by determining whether factors predictive of disease progression are present in those patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17481941      PMCID: PMC3966142          DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2007.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye        ISSN: 1367-0484            Impact factor:   3.077


  24 in total

1.  Repeatability of subjective refraction in myopic and keratoconic subjects: results of vector analysis.

Authors:  T W Raasch; K B Schechtman; L J Davis; K Zadnik
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Corneal scarring and vision in keratoconus: a baseline report from the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study.

Authors:  K Zadnik; J T Barr; T B Edrington; J J Nichols; B S Wilson; K Siegmund; M O Gordon
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  Longitudinal changes in corneal curvature in keratoconus.

Authors:  Timothy T McMahon; Timothy B Edrington; Loretta Szczotka-Flynn; Harald E Olafsson; Larry J Davis; Kenneth B Schechtman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.651

4.  The relation between disease asymmetry and severity in keratoconus.

Authors:  J J Nichols; K Steger-May; T B Edrington; K Zadnik
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Quality of life in keratoconus.

Authors:  Steven M Kymes; Jeffrey J Walline; Karla Zadnik; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  New design principles for visual acuity letter charts.

Authors:  I L Bailey; J E Lovie
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1976-11

7.  Apical changes and scarring in keratoconus as related to contact lens fitting techniques.

Authors:  D R Korb; V M Finnemore; J P Herman
Journal:  J Am Optom Assoc       Date:  1982-03

8.  Factors associated with corneal scarring in the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study.

Authors:  J T Barr; K Zadnik; B S Wilson; T B Edrington; D F Everett; B A Fink; J P Shovlin; B A Weissman; K Siegmund; M O Gordon
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.651

9.  Between-eye asymmetry in keratoconus.

Authors:  Karla Zadnik; Karen Steger-May; Barbara A Fink; Charlotte E Joslin; Jason J Nichols; Carol E Rosenstiel; Julie A Tyler; Julie A Yu; Thomas W Raasch; Kenneth B Schechtman
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.651

10.  Variables affecting rigid contact lens comfort in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study.

Authors:  Timothy B Edrington; Ralph E Gundel; David P Libassi; Heidi Wagner; Gilbert E Pierce; Jeffrey J Walline; Joseph T Barr; Harald E Olafsson; Karen Steger-May; Joel Achtenberg; Brad S Wilson; Mae O Gordon; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  56 in total

1.  In vivo corneal confocal microscopic analysis in patients with keratoconus.

Authors:  Gulfidan Bitirgen; Ahmet Ozkagnici; Banu Bozkurt; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Comparison of corneal keratocytes before and after corneal collagen cross-linking in keratoconus patients.

Authors:  Mohammad-Naeim Aminifard; Hoda Khallaghi; Mahdi Mohammadi; Reza Jafarzadeh
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Effects of contact lens wearing on keratoconus: a confocal microscopy observation.

Authors:  Somnath Ghosh; Haliza A Mutalib; Rituparna Ghoshal; Shamala Retnasabapathy
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Is keratoconus more severe in pediatric population?

Authors:  Mohammad Naderan; Mohammad Taher Rajabi; Parviz Zarrinbakhsh; Mahgol Farjadnia
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Clinical Evaluation and Validation of the Dutch Crosslinking for Keratoconus Score.

Authors:  Robert P L Wisse; Rob W P Simons; Martijn J B van der Vossen; Marc B Muijzer; Nienke Soeters; Rudy M M A Nuijts; Daniel A Godefrooij
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.389

6.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: visual and graft survival outcomes.

Authors:  Mansour M Al-Mohaimeed
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2013-01

7.  Keratoconus and granular dystrophy.

Authors:  Clare M Wilson; Penny J D'Ath; Dipak N Parmar; Evripidis Sykakis
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-08-25

8.  Visual performance with changes in eccentricity in PROSE device: a case report.

Authors:  Divya Jagadeesh; Rajeswari Mahadevan
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2013-05-14

Review 9.  Current perspectives in the management of keratoconus with contact lenses.

Authors:  Li Lim; Elizabeth Wen Ling Lim
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.775

10.  Visual rehabilitation in low-moderate keratoconus: intracorneal ring segment implantation followed by same-day topography-guided photorefractive keratectomy and collagen cross linking.

Authors:  Ferial M Zeraid; Asma A Jawkhab; Waleed S Al-Tuwairqi; Uchechukwu L Osuagwu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.