| Literature DB >> 26904679 |
Natasha Kishore Pahuja1, Rohit Shetty1, Rudy M M A Nuijts2, Aarti Agrawal1, Arkasubhra Ghosh1, Chaitra Jayadev1, Harsha Nagaraja1.
Abstract
Purpose. To study the corneal nerve morphology and its importance in unilateral keratoconus. Materials and Methods. In this prospective cross-sectional study, 33 eyes of 33 patients with keratoconus in one eye (Group 3) were compared with the other normal eye of the same patients (Group 2) and 30 eyes of healthy patients (Group 1). All patients underwent detailed ophthalmic examination followed by topography with Pentacam HR and in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM). Five images obtained with IVCM were analyzed using an automated CCmetrics software version 1.0 for changes in subbasal plexus of nerves. Results. Intergroup comparison showed statistically significant reduction in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) and length (CNFL) in Group 3 as compared to Group 1 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, resp.) and Group 2 (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, resp.). Though corneal nerve fiber length, diameter, area, width, corneal nerve branch density, and corneal total branch density were found to be higher in decentered cones, only the corneal nerve branch density (CNBD) was found to be statistically significant (p < 0.01) as compared to centered cones. Conclusion. Quantitative changes in the corneal nerve morphology can be used as an imaging marker for the early diagnosis of keratoconus before the onset of refractive or topography changes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 26904679 PMCID: PMC4745354 DOI: 10.1155/2016/5067853
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1In vivo confocal microscopy image (a) of the subbasal plexus of nerves in a patient of keratoconus and the same image after analysis by the automated CCmetrics software (b).
The mean of subbasal nerve plexus parameters with the standard deviation. Group 1 is control eye, Group 2 is unaffected eye of unilateral keratoconus, and Group 3 is keratoconic eye of unilateral keratoconus.
| Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 1 versus Group 2 | Group 1 versus Group 3 | Group 2 versus Group 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNFD | 30.51 ± 5.8 | 28.48 ± 23.82 | 23.82 ± 8.02 | 0.26 | <0.001 | 0.01 |
| CNBD | 43.45 ± 15.29 | 34.7 ± 16.1 | 37.61 ± 19.82 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 0.51 |
| CNFL | 17.59 ± 3.16 | 16.6 ± 2.42 | 14.82 ± 3.61 | 0.2 | 0.001 | 0.02 |
| CTBD | 59.73 ± 20.75 | 49.05 ± 25.3 | 54.66 ± 27.15 | 0.09 | 0.41 | 0.36 |
| CNFA | 0.01 ± 0.002 | 0.006 ± 0.001 | 0.006 ± 0.002 | 0.13 | 0.06 | 0.68 |
| CNFW | 0.02 ± 0.001 | 0.021 ± 0.002 | 0.02 ± 0.002 | 0.29 | 0.13 | 0.63 |
The mean of subbasal nerve plexus parameters with the standard deviation. Group 3a is centered cones and group 3b is decentered cones.
| Centered | Decentered |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNFD | 21.6 ± 9.1 | 26.4 ± 5.6 | 0.09 |
| CNBD | 29.6 ± 18.9 | 47.1 ± 16.7 |
|
| CNFL | 13.8 ± 4.3 | 15.9 ± 1.9 | 0.08 |
| CTBD | 46.9 ± 29.0 | 63.9 ± 22.1 | 0.07 |
| CNFA | 5 × 10−3 ± 2 × 10−3 | 6 × 10−3 ± 1 × 10−3 | 0.08 |
| CNFW | 2 × 10−2 ± 2 × 10−3 | 2 × 10−2 ± 1 × 10−3 | 1.0 |