Literature DB >> 23108368

The influence of stimulus duration on visual illusions and simple reaction time.

Thorsten Plewan1, Ralph Weidner, Gereon R Fink.   

Abstract

Target detection is affected by stimulus intensity. For instance, participants respond faster to larger objects than to smaller objects. In order to compute an object's size, the brain integrates contextual information, for example object distance. Accordingly, the perceived size of an object can be altered via depth cues which modulate perceived object distance. Recently, it has been demonstrated that reaction times are influenced by the perceived rather than by the retinal size of an object, thus indicating that manual responses are generated after the perceptual integration of distance and retinal size. However, the timing aspects of these integration processes to date remain largely unclear. Therefore, the present study investigated the influence of stimulus duration on size-distance integration by means of a simple reaction time paradigm and the well-known Ponzo illusion. In experiment 1, participants responded faster to perceptually longer lines within an illusion-inducing background, whereas no such effect was associated with a neutral background. Experiment 2 revealed that this effect depended on stimulus duration. Stimuli were reliably perceived even with the shortest durations. However, illusion-induced modulations of response times were not observed for stimulus durations shorter than 40 ms. The findings indicate that the integration of context and object information requires visual input to last for at least 40 ms. The data furthermore show that as long as the visual system has not enough time to integrate context and object information, size perception is formed on the basis of lower-level representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23108368     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3265-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

1.  The Ponzo illusion and the perception of orientation.

Authors:  W Prinzmetal; A P Shimamura; M Mikolinski
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-01

2.  DISTORTION OF VISUAL SPACE AS INAPPROPRIATE CONSTANCY SCALING.

Authors:  R L GREGORY
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1963-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Spatial attention in Ponzo-like patterns.

Authors:  A W Pressey; D Epp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-08

4.  Distracting effects in length matching.

Authors:  Aleksandr Bulatov; Algis Bertulis
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.579

5.  Visual search for size-defined target objects is modulated by the Ebbinghaus apparent-size illusion: facilitatory and inhibitory effects of the context objects.

Authors:  Hermann J Müller; Astrid Busch
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Relationships among visual awareness, reaction time, and lateralized readiness potential in a simple reaction time task under the backward masking paradigm.

Authors:  Kunitake Suzuki; Kuniyasu Imanaka
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2009-08

7.  Reaction time as a function of peripheral retinal locus around fovea: effect of stimulus size.

Authors:  N Osaka
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1976-10

Review 8.  Knowledge in perception and illusion.

Authors:  R L Gregory
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  Attention-dependent representation of a size illusion in human V1.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Huseyin Boyaci; Daniel Kersten; Scott O Murray
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  7 in total

1.  Temporal processing characteristics of the Ponzo illusion.

Authors:  Filipp Schmidt; Anke Haberkamp
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-03-13

2.  Simple reaction time and size-distance integration in virtual 3D space.

Authors:  Thorsten Plewan; Gerhard Rinkenauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-03-30

3.  Enhanced visual dominance in far space.

Authors:  Zhenzhu Yue; Yizhou Jiang; You Li; Pengfei Wang; Qi Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Fast and Forceful: Modulation of Response Activation Induced by Shifts of Perceived Depth in Virtual 3D Space.

Authors:  Thorsten Plewan; Gerhard Rinkenauer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-15

5.  Visual search in virtual 3D space: the relation of multiple targets and distractors.

Authors:  Thorsten Plewan; Gerhard Rinkenauer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-02

6.  Visual Responses to Moving and Flashed Stimuli of Neurons in Domestic Pigeon (Columba livia domestica) Optic Tectum.

Authors:  Shuman Huang; Xiaoke Niu; Jiangtao Wang; Zhizhong Wang; Huaxing Xu; Li Shi
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.231

7.  Quantifying the Ebbinghaus figure effect: target size, context size, and target-context distance determine the presence and direction of the illusion.

Authors:  Hester Knol; Raoul Huys; Jean-Christophe Sarrazin; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-11-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.