Literature DB >> 11337001

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency.

K Ackroff1, K Touzani, T K Peets, A Sclafani.   

Abstract

Many prior conditioning studies indicate that fructose, unlike glucose, has minimal postingestive reinforcing effects. Using a new training procedure, food-restricted rats were trained in alternate 20-h/day sessions with one flavored solution (CS+F) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% fructose and another flavor (CS-) paired with IG water. In subsequent two-bottle tests they showed a robust (85%) preference for the CS+F over the CS-. A third flavor (CS+G) was then paired with IG 16% glucose, and it was strongly preferred to the CS+F. When retrained 30 min/day with new flavors paired with IG fructose, glucose, or water the rats learned only a CS+G preference. When training was extended to 20 h/day, a CS+F preference developed. New rats trained 20 h/day with two-bottle access to CS+F and CS- paired with IG fructose and water failed to acquire a CS+F preference. Other rats rapidly developed a strong preference when trained with concurrent access to CS+G and CS- paired with IG glucose and water. These data indicate that both fructose and glucose generate postingestive reinforcing signals, but that the fructose signals are weaker and/or delayed relative to those produced by glucose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11337001     DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(01)00442-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  34 in total

Review 1.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  A mixed design reveals that glucose moieties facilitate extinction of a conditioned taste aversion in rats.

Authors:  Michael E Smith; Ralph Norgren; Patricia Sue Grigson
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Flavor avoidance learning based on missing calories but not on palatability reduction.

Authors:  Robert A Boakes; Angela E Patterson; Dorothy W S Kwok
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 4.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

Review 5.  Does nutrient sensing determine how we "see" food?

Authors:  Sophie C Hamr; Beini Wang; Timothy D Swartz; Frank A Duca
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric glucose but not fructose or galactose in C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-03-14

7.  Strain differences in sucrose- and fructose-conditioned flavor preferences in mice.

Authors:  Alexander Pinhas; Michael Aviel; Michael Koen; Simon Gurgov; Vanessa Acosta; Michael Israel; Leonid Kakuriev; Elena Guskova; Isabelle Fuzailov; Khalid Touzani; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-09-14

8.  High-fructose corn syrup causes characteristics of obesity in rats: increased body weight, body fat and triglyceride levels.

Authors:  Miriam E Bocarsly; Elyse S Powell; Nicole M Avena; Bartley G Hoebel
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Rapid post-oral stimulation of intake and flavor conditioning in rats by glucose but not a non-metabolizable glucose analog.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-05-06

10.  Flavor preference conditioning by different sugars in sweet ageusic Trpm5 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-12-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.