Literature DB >> 16035343

Examining task difficulty and the time course of inhibition of return: detecting perceptually degraded targets.

Alan D Castel1, Jay Pratt, Alison L Chasteen, Charles T Scialfa.   

Abstract

The ability to efficiently direct visual attention to salient features in the environment is a critical function of the visual system. The finding that people are slower to detect a target that appears at a previously cued location is thought to reflect a mechanism known as inhibition of return (IOR). Past research has shown that difficult target discriminations result in a greater amount of time needed to inhibit previously attended locations (i.e., a delayed onset of inhibition), suggesting that task difficulty plays a critical role in the allocation of attention. In this study, IOR was measured at a wide range of SOAs while participants detected either a perceptually degraded target or a standard, high luminance target. When responses were made to a perceptually degraded target, the time course of IOR was delayed by approximately 250 ms (relative to the control group), suggesting that the difficulty in detecting targets also influences the allocation of attention. The results are consistent with the notion that IOR is not simply a reflexive subcortical mechanism but rather involves top-down attentional control settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16035343     DOI: 10.1037/h0087464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  7 in total

1.  Inhibition of return: unraveling a paradox.

Authors:  Elina Birmingham; Troy A W Visser; Janice J Snyder; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

2.  Electrophysiological evidence for cognitive control during conflict processing in visual spatial attention.

Authors:  Stefanie Kehrer; Antje Kraft; Kerstin Irlbacher; Stefan P Koch; Herbert Hagendorf; Norbert Kathmann; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-12-03

Review 3.  Reconceptualizing inhibition of return as habituation of the orienting response.

Authors:  Kristie R Dukewich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

4.  Spatial Attention and Temporal Expectation Under Timed Uncertainty Predictably Modulate Neuronal Responses in Monkey V1.

Authors:  Jitendra Sharma; Hiroki Sugihara; Yarden Katz; James Schummers; Joshua Tenenbaum; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Effects of task and task-switching on temporal inhibition of return, facilitation of return, and saccadic momentum during scene viewing.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Edwin S Dalmaijer; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  A Microsaccadic Account of Attentional Capture and Inhibition of Return in Posner Cueing.

Authors:  Xiaoguang Tian; Masatoshi Yoshida; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-07

7.  No supplementary evidence of attention to a spatial cue when saccadic facilitation is absent.

Authors:  W Joseph MacInnes; Roopali Bhatnagar
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.